High-dose cyclophosphamide for hard-to-treat patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, a phase II result.

BACKGROUND: High-dose cyclophosphamide to treat solid refractory tumors demonstrated meaningful activity, while data to treat lymphoma remain scarce. This study aims to assess high-dose cyclophosphamide to treat relapsed or refractory lymphoma. METHODS: A phase II study included adult patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, previously treated by ≥2 prior lines with no other available option of therapy. High-dose cyclophosphamide was given intravenously 3 g/m2 over two consecutive days and repeated once at 28 days in responding patients. Rituximab 375 mg/m2 intravenously was added in patients not refractory to anti-CD20 antibody. RESULTS: Forty-two patients with median age 65 [56-70] years were included. Patients had previously received a median of four lines of therapies. Tumor types were diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 26; 62%), indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 10; 24%), or mantle lymphoma (n = 6; 14%). Hematologic and non-hematologic grade 3-5 toxicities occurred in 42 (100%) and 18 (43%) of patients, respectively. The overall response rate was 45%. CONCLUSION: One to two cycles of high-dose cyclophosphamide in hard-to-treat patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma demonstrated a favorable safety and efficacy profile. This regimen could serve as a bridge to modern cellular therapy with CAR-T cell.

Concurrent Etoposide, Steroid, High-dose Ara-C and Platinum chemotherapy with radiation therapy in localised extranodal natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type.

PURPOSE: Radiation combined with chemotherapy has recently been proposed to treat patients with localised extranodal natural killer (NK)/T lymphoma (ENKTL), nasal type. However, the modalities of the chemoradiotherapy combination and drug choices remain a matter of debate. We conducted a concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) study with the ESHAP (Etoposide, Steroid, High-dose Ara-C and Platinum) regimen. METHODS: An induction phase with two upfront courses of CCRT delivering a 40Gy dose of radiation concurrently with two cycles of the ESHAP chemotherapy regimen, followed by a consolidation phase with 2-3 cycles of ESHAP chemotherapy alone. RESULTS: Thirteen patients with localised ENKTL nasal type were enrolled between January 2005 and December 2014. The median age was 62years. Ten and three patients had Ann Arbor stage IE and IIE disease, respectively. They all completed the induction CCRT phase. A median of two consolidation ESHAP cycles were delivered. During consolidation, 8/13 (62%) patients had a reduction in the number of chemotherapy cycles or reduced chemotherapy doses, due to haematologically adverse events. The other five patients (38%) received the full number of ESHAP cycles of chemotherapy scheduled without a dose reduction. All but one patient (92%) experienced grade 3-4 haematological toxicity. The main non-haematological grade 3-4 toxicity was mucositis in 6/13 (46%) patients. All but one patient (92%) achieved a complete remission. Two-year overall survival was 72%. CONCLUSIONS: With optimal management of the specific toxicities induced by this treatment modality, CCRT with the ESHAP regimen yielded high efficacy against localised ENKTL, nasal type.