Comparison of chest compression only and standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Singapore.

OBJECTIVE: Chest compression only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CC-CPR) without ventilation has been proposed as an alternative to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for bystanders. However, there has been controversy regarding the relative effectiveness of both of these techniques. We aim to compare the outcomes of cardiac arrest patients in the cardiac arrest and resuscitation epidemiology study who either received CC-CPR, standard CPR or no bystander CPR. METHODS: This prospective cohort study involved all out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients attended to by emergency medical service (EMS) providers in a large urban centre. The data analyses were conducted secondarily on these collected data. The technique of bystander CPR was reported by paramedics who arrived at the scene. RESULTS: From 1 October 2001 to 14 October 2004, 2428 patients were enrolled into the study. Of these, 255 were EMS-witnessed arrests and were excluded. 1695 cases did not receive any bystander CPR, 287 had standard CPR and 154 CC-CPR. Patient characteristics were similar in both the standard and CC-CPR groups except for a higher incidence of residential arrests and previous heart disease sufferers in the CC-CPR group. Patients who received standard CPR (odds ratio (OR) 5.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1-14.0) or CC-CPR (OR 5.0, 95% CI 1.5-16.4) were more likely to survive to discharge than those who had no bystander CPR. There was no significant difference in survival to discharge between those who received CC-CPR and standard CPR (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.3-3.1). CONCLUSION: We found that patients were more likely to survive with any form of bystander CPR than without. This emphasises the importance of chest compressions for OHCA patients, whether with or without ventilation.

An observational study describing the geographic-time distribution of cardiac arrests in Singapore: what is the utility of geographic information systems for planning public access defibrillation? (PADS Phase I).

INTRODUCTION: Public access defibrillation (PAD) has shown potential to increase cardiac arrest survival rates. OBJECTIVES: To describe the geographic epidemiology of prehospital cardiac arrest in Singapore using geographic information systems (GIS) technology and assess the potential for deployment of a PAD program. METHODS: We conducted an observational prospective study looking at the geographic location of pre-hospital cardiac arrests in Singapore. Included were all patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) presented to emergency departments. Patient characteristics, cardiac arrest circumstances, emergency medical service (EMS) response and outcomes were recorded according to the Utstein style. Location of cardiac arrests was spot-mapped using GIS. RESULTS: From 1 October 2001 to 14 October 2004, 2428 patients were enrolled into the study. Mean age for arrests was 60.6 years with 68.0% male. 67.8% of arrests occurred in residences, with 54.5% bystander witnessed and another 10.5% EMS witnessed. Mean EMS response time was 9.6 min with 21.7% receiving prehospital defibrillation. Cardiac arrest occurrence was highest in the suburban town centers in the Eastern and Southern part of the country. We also identified communities with the highest arrest rates. About twice as many arrests occurred during the day (07:00-18:59 h) compared to night (19:00-06:59 h). The categories with the highest frequencies of occurrence included residential areas, in vehicles, healthcare facilities, along roads, shopping areas and offices/industrial areas. CONCLUSION: We found a definite geographical distribution pattern of cardiac arrest. This study demonstrates the utility of GIS with a national cardiac arrest database and has implications for implementing a PAD program, targeted CPR training, AED placement and ambulance deployment.