Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Urogynecol J ; 34(8): 1949-1954, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36811634

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to characterize the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (FSUI) in Brazil. METHODS: This study was conducted with population-based data from the Brazilian public health system database. We obtained data on the number of surgical procedures for FSUI in 2019 (before the coronavirus disease [COVID-19] pandemic), 2020, and 2021 (during the pandemic) in each of the 27 Brazilian states. We included official Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) data on the population, Human Development Index (HDI), and annual per capita income of each state. RESULTS: A total of 6,718 surgical procedures for FSUI were performed in the Brazilian public health system in 2019. The number of procedures was reduced by 56.2% in 2020, and an additional reduction of 7.2% was seen in 2021. The distribution of procedures by state showed important differences, ranging from 4.4 procedures/1,000,000 inhabitants in Paraíba and Sergipe to 67.6 procedures/1,000,000 inhabitants in Paraná (p<0.01) in 2019. The number of surgical procedures was higher in states with a higher HDI (p=0.0001) and per capita income (p=0.042). The decrease in the number of surgical procedures affected the whole country and its rate did not correlate with HDI (p=0.289) or per capita income (p=0.598). CONCLUSION: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the surgical treatment of FSUI in Brazil was significant in 2020 and persisted in 2021. Access to surgical treatment of FSUI varied according to geographic region, HDI, and per capita income, even before COVID-19.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Slings Suburetrais , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse , Feminino , Humanos , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/epidemiologia , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/cirurgia , Brasil/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Saúde Pública , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos
4.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 44(1): 109-113, Jan.-Feb. 2018. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-892950

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Introduction Surgical treatment of urinary incontinence progressed significantly with the introduction of synthetic slings. However, in some public Brazilian hospitals, the costs of these materials prevent their routine use. Objective To compare the costs of ambulatory synthetic sling surgery with an historical series of patients submitted to Burch surgery in a Brazilian public hospital. Materials and Methods Twenty nine incontinent patients were selected to synthetic sling surgery. Demographic data were prospectively collected and also the costs of the procedure, including drugs and materials, use of surgical and recovery wards, medical staff and hospitalization. These data were compared to the costs of 29 Burch surgeries performed before the introduction of synthetic slings. Results Demographic data were similar, although median age was lower in the group submitted to Burch surgery (46.3±8.6 versus 56.2±11.3 (p<0.001)). Cost was significantly lower in patients submitted to sling in all items, except for time spent in recovery ward. Total value of 29 Burch surgeries was R$ 217.766.12, and of R$ 68.049.92 of 29 patients submitted to sling surgery (p<0.001). Conclusion Burch surgery was more expensive than ambulatory synthetic transobturator sling surgery, even when the cost of the synthetic sling was considered.


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Adulto Jovem , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/cirurgia , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/economia , Slings Suburetrais/economia , Brasil , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hospitais Públicos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
5.
Int Braz J Urol ; 44(1): 109-113, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29135411

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Surgical treatment of urinary incontinence progressed significantly with the introduction of synthetic slings. However, in some public Brazilian hospitals, the costs of these materials prevent their routine use. OBJECTIVE: To compare the costs of ambulatory synthetic sling surgery with an historical series of patients submitted to Burch surgery in a Brazilian public hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty nine incontinent patients were selected to synthetic sling surgery. Demographic data were prospectively collected and also the costs of the procedure, including drugs and materials, use of surgical and recovery wards, medical staff and hospitalization. These data were compared to the costs of 29 Burch surgeries performed before the introduction of synthetic slings. RESULTS: Demographic data were similar, although median age was lower in the group submitted to Burch surgery (46.3±8.6 versus 56.2±11.3 (p<0.001)). Cost was significantly lower in patients submitted to sling in all items, except for time spent in recovery ward. Total value of 29 Burch surgeries was R$ 217.766.12, and of R$ 68.049.92 of 29 patients submitted to sling surgery (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Burch surgery was more expensive than ambulatory synthetic transobturator sling surgery, even when the cost of the synthetic sling was considered.


Assuntos
Slings Suburetrais/economia , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/economia , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Brasil , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hospitais Públicos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA