Impact of nutritional assessment and body mass index on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: An inverse association between obesity, as defined by body mass index (BMI) and prognosis has been reported in patients with cardiovascular disease ("obesity paradox"). The aim of this study was to investigate whether adding nutritional information to BMI provides better risk assessment in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHOD: This study comprised 1004 patients undergoing elective PCI. We calculated each patient's controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score for nutritional screening at baseline. Patients were divided into 4 groups based on CONUT score (low, 0-1 [<75th percentile]; or high, ≥2 [≥75th percentile]) and BMI (normal, 18.5-24.9kg/m2; or high, ≥25kg/m2). The endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as cardiac death and/or myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Low CONUT score+normal BMI, low CONUT score+high BMI, high CONUT score+normal BMI, and high CONUT score+high BMI were determined in 374, 242, 275, and 113 patients, respectively. During a median follow-up of 1779 days, 73 events occurred. High CONUT score+normal BMI showed a 2.72-fold increase in the incidence of MACE (95% CI 1.46-5.08, p=0.002) compared with low CONUT score+normal BMI after adjusting for confounding factors. On the other hand, no significant difference in the incidence of MACE was observed in the other three groups. CONCLUSION: The combination of CONUT score and BMI was a useful predictor of MACE in this population. Using BMI to assess the cardiovascular risk may be misleading unless the nutritional information is considered.

Impact of Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: The association between malnutrition and cardiovascular prognosis in patients with stable coronary artery disease remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), a simple tool to assess nutritional risk, and long-term outcomes after elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: This study consisted of 802 patients (age, 70±10 years, male, 69%) who underwent elective PCI. GNRI was calculated at baseline as follows: GNRI=[14.89×serum albumin (g/dl)+[41.7×(body weight/body weight at body mass index of 22)]]. Patients were then divided into three groups as previously reported: GNRI <92, 92 to ≤98, and >98. The endpoint of this study was the composite of cardiac death or non-fatal myocardial infarction. RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 1568 days, 56 cardiac events occurred. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 4-year event-free rates were found to be 79% for GNRI <92, 90% for GNRI 92 to ≤98, and 97% for GNRI >98 (log-rank test p<0.001). GNRI <92 and GNRI 92 to ≤98 showed 6.76-fold [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.13-14.56, p<0.001] and 3.03-fold (HR 3.03, 95%CI 1.36-6.78, p=0.007) increase in the incidences of cardiac death or non-fatal myocardial infarction compared with GNRI >98 after adjusting for confounding factors. CONCLUSION: GNRI significantly associated with cardiac events after elective PCI. Further studies should be performed to establish appropriate therapeutic strategies for this vulnerable patient group.