Influencia del pH de cordón umbilical en el resultado del cribado auditivo con otoemisiones en recién nacidos sanos / Influence of umbilical cord pH on the outcome of hearing screening with otoacoustic emissions in healthy newborns

Objetivo Es conocido el efecto de la hipoxia sobre el funcionamiento de las células ciliadas externas de la cóclea, que son las responsables de la respuesta a las otoemisiones utilizadas en el cribado auditivo neonatal. El objetivo de este estudio es conocer la influencia de variaciones leves o moderadas del pH de cordón umbilical al nacer en el resultado del cribado auditivo con otoemisiones en recién nacidos sanos sin factores de riesgo auditivo. Resultados La muestra está compuesta de 4.536 niños sanos. Los resultados no muestran diferencias significativas en el resultado del cribado auditivo entre el grupo de pH asfíctico (<7,20) y normal. Tampoco se detecta una cifra de pH inferior a 7,20 en la muestra que se relacione con alteración en el cribado. Desglosando en subgrupos con factores conocidos de variación en el resultado del cribado, como es el género o la lactancia, tampoco se detectan diferencias significativas de respuesta. El Apgar ≤ 7 sí se relaciona significativamente con un pH<7,20. Conclusiones En conclusión, las situaciones de asfixia leve-moderada asociadas al parto de recién nacidos sanos sin factores de riesgo auditivo no alteran el resultado del cribado con otoemisiones. (AU)

Objective The effect of hypoxia on the functioning of the outer hair cells of the cochlea, which are responsible for the response to otoemissions used in neonatal hearing screening, is well known. The aim of this study is to determine the influence of mild to moderate variations in umbilical cord pH at birth on the outcome of hearing screening with otoemissions in healthy newborns without hearing risk factors. Results The sample is composed of 4536 healthy infants. The results show no significant differences in the hearing screening outcome between the asphyctic (<7.20) and normal pH group. Nor is a figure below 7.20 detected in the sample that is related to an alteration in the screening. When broken down into subgroups with known factors of variation in the screening result, such as gender or lactation, no significant differences in response were detected. Apgar ≤ 7 is significantly related to pH<7.20. Conclusions In conclusion, mild-moderate asphyxia associated with delivery of healthy newborns, without auditory risk factors, does not alter the outcome of otoemission screening. (AU)

Analysis of selective screening for congenital cytomegalovirus in a secondary hospital: Problems and solutions.

Universal hearing screening offers unique possibilities for detection of congenital deafness as a consequence of congenital cytomegalovirus (CMVc) infection, so its selective study in the case of a failed test could be a non-negligible screening opportunity while other guidelines covering the possibility of universal screening are adopted. The aim of this study is to analyse the possibility of selective screening for CMVc after an altered hearing test in a regional hospital. During the period studied, the results obtained were unsatisfactory, especially in children born outside the hospital of residence, showing an excessive delay in hearing screening in many cases and in the few cases where CMVc screening could be performed, only 30% had the test ordered in a timely manner. The reasons for this are varied and the solution is to include selective screening for CMVc in the hearing screening programme. This implies shortening the timing of the hearing screening protocol to allow CMVc testing in saliva or urine (preferably) before 21 days of age and providing screening programmes with the necessary staff and time to perform it properly.

Influence of umbilical cord pH on the outcome of hearing screening with otoacoustic emissions in healthy newborns.

The effect of hypoxia on the functioning of the outer hair cells of the cochlea, which are responsible for the response to otoemissions used in neonatal hearing screening, is well known. The aim of this study is to determine the influence of mild to moderate variations in umbilical cord pH at birth on the outcome of hearing screening with otoemissions in healthy newborns without hearing risk factors. The sample is composed of 4536 healthy infants. The results show no significant differences in the hearing screening outcome between the asphyctic (<7.20) and normal pH group. Nor is a figure below 7.20 detected in the sample that is related to an alteration in the screening. When broken down into subgroups with known factors of variation in the screening result, such as gender or lactation, no significant differences in response were detected. Apgar ≤7 is significantly related to pH<7.20. In conclusion, mild-moderate asphyxia associated with delivery of healthy newborns, without auditory risk factors, does not alter the outcome of otoemission screening.

Neonatal Hearing Rescreening in a Second-Level Hospital: Problems and Solutions.

Second-level hospitals face peculiarities that make it difficult to implement hearing rescreening protocols, which is also common in other settings. This study analyzes the hearing rescreening process in these kinds of hospitals. A total of 1130 individuals were included; in this cohort, 61.07% were hospital newborns who failed their first otoacoustic emission test after birth (n = 679) or were unable to perform the test (n = 11), and who were then referred to an outpatient clinic. The remaining 38.93% were individuals born in another hospital with their first test conducted in the outpatient clinic (n = 440). A high number of rescreenings were made outside of the recommended time frame, mainly in children referred from another hospital. There was a high lost-to-follow-up rate, especially regarding otolaryngologist referrals. Neonatal hearing screening at second-level hospitals is difficult because of staffing and time constraints. This results in turnaround times that are longer than recommended, interfering with the timely detection of hearing loss. This is particularly serious in outpatient children with impaired screening. Referral to out-of-town centers leads to unacceptable follow-up loss. Legislative support for all these rescreening issues is necessary. In this article, these findings are discussed and some solutions are proposed.