Evaluation of fundamental critical care course in Kenya: knowledge, attitude, and practice.

BACKGROUND: Critical care training for medical personnel is crucial for the survival of the highest acuity patients. The Fundamental Critical Care Course (FCCS), a critical care course developed by the Society of Critical Care Medicine, permits course adaption and, thus, has potential for global dissemination. The FCCS course was provided in two Kenyan hospitals after minimal adaption. Participant knowledge and confidence gain as well as FCCS applicability to an African context were evaluated. METHODS: Questionnaires and a multiple-choice test were administered to assess knowledge, attitude, and self-reported confidence or self-efficacy. For applicability, the pre-course questionnaire assessed participant expectations and existing levels of confidence/knowledge in the care of the critically ill patient. Post-course, the participant evaluated the overall quality of the course, lectures, and skill stations along with context applicability questions. RESULTS: There were 100 participants, 45 doctors, 45 nurses, and 10 clinical officers. There was a 22.7% gain in the mean test score (P < 0.0001) after the course, with 98% of participants showing improvement. Confidence to perform new skills post-course, or self-efficacy, was demonstrated by a median of 4 or greater on a Likert scale of 5 (most confident) in 10 of 12 clinical scenarios and in 11 of 14 new procedures. There was a consistency between areas reported as needed expertise, and participant evaluation of similar lecture and skill station's quality and appropriateness. The most common areas reported were mechanical ventilation, patient monitoring, and their related procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The FCCS course met participant's expectations and was reported as applicable for the Kenyan context with minimal adaption. Post-course, knowledge improved and confidence increased for implementation of new skills in clinical care situations. We confirmed the effectiveness and relevancy of the FCCS course for other resource-constrained health care settings.

Evaluation of trauma and critical care training courses on the knowledge and confidence of participants in Kenya and Zambia.

BACKGROUND: Trained health-care personnel are essential for improved outcomes for injured and critically ill patients. The highest injury-related mortality is seen in sub-Saharan Africa, where there is a paucity of skilled personnel. Therefore, the College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa (COSECSA) along with Emory University provided an acute trauma care (ATC) and fundamental critical care support course (FCCS). This study evaluates the impact of American-derived courses on the knowledge and confidence of participants from resource-limited countries. METHODS: Courses were held in Lusaka, Zambia, and Nakuru, Kenya. Participants were COSECSA trainees and personnel from local institutions. The evaluation used a pre-/postcourse multiple-choice exam for knowledge acquisition and a pre-/postcourse questionnaire for confidence assessment. Confidence was measured using a 5-point Likert score, with 5 being the highest level of confidence. Confidence or self-reported efficacy is correlated with increased performance of new skills. RESULTS: There were 75 participants (median age = 31 years, 67% male). Three-quarters of the participants reported no prior specific training in either trauma or critical care. Knowledge increased from an average of 51 to 63.3% (p = 0.002) overall, with a 21.7% gain for those who scored in the lowest quartile. Confidence increased from pre- to postcourse on all measures tested: 22 clinical situations (10 trauma, 9 critical care, 3 either) and 15 procedures (p < 0.001 for all measures both individually and aggregated, Wilcoxon rank sum test). The strongest absolute increase in confidence, as well as the largest number of participants who reported any increase, were all in the procedures of cricothyroidotomy [median: pre = 3 (IQR: 2-3) to post = 5 (IQR: 4-5)], DPL [median: pre = 3 (IQR: 2-4) to post = 5 (IQR: 4-5)], and needle decompression [median: pre = 3 (IQR: 3-4) to post = 5 (IQR: 5-5)]. CONCLUSIONS: Participants from resource-limited countries benefit from ATC/FCCS courses as demonstrated by increased knowledge and confidence across all topics presented. However, the strongest increase in confidence was in performing life-saving procedures. Therefore, future courses should emphasize essential procedures, reduce didactics, and link knowledge acquisition to skill-based teaching.