Detection of cytokines in nasal lavage samples of patients with cystic fibrosis: comparison of two different cytokine detection assays.

BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic multisystem disorder. Inflammatory processes, which presumably begin early in infancy, play a crucial role in the progression of the disease. The detection of inflammatory biomarkers, especially in the airways, has therefore gained increasing attention. Due to improved treatment options, patients with CF produce less sputum. Nasal lavage samples therefore represent a promising alternative to induced sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage specimens. However, methodology of cytokine measurements is not standardised and comparisons of results are therefore often difficult. The aim of this study was to identify suitable detection methods of cytokines in nasal lavage samples by comparison of two different assays. METHODS: Nasal lavage samples were obtained from the same patient at the same time by trained respiratory physiotherapists using a disposable syringe and 10 ml of 0.9% sodium chloride per nostril during outpatient visits. The cytokines IL-17 A, IL-2, IL-6 and IL-10 were measured using two different assays (BD™ and Milliplex®), which have already been applied in sputum and nasal lavage samples, despite different lower detection limits. RESULTS: 22 participants were included in the study. In 95.5% of measurements, values were below the limit of detection with respect to the BD™ assay. Only IL-6 could be detected in approximately half of the patients. Individual cytokine levels were considerably higher when measured with Milliplex®, which is also reflected in a statistically significant manner (p = < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The right choice of analysis method is crucial for measuring inflammatory markers in nasal lavage samples. Compared to the literature, Milliplex® showed higher detection rates and similar concentrations to other studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the ethics committee at Medical University of Innsbruck (EK Nr: 1055/2022).

Long-Term Assessment of Antibody Response to COVID-19 Vaccination in People with Cystic Fibrosis and Solid Organ Transplantation.

With the worldwide spread of SARS-CoV-2 disease, people with cystic fibrosis (CF), especially solid organ transplant recipients, have quickly been identified as a risk group for severe disease. Studies have shown low antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in recipients of solid organ transplant compared to the healthy population. Information on immune response in CF patients with solid organ transplantation is limited, especially regarding long-term efficacy. The aim of this real-world study was a long-term assessment of humoral immune response induced by three and four doses of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. S1RBD and IgG antibodies were measured every 12 weeks over a period of 27 months in twelve CF patients (five liver and seven lung transplantation recipients). A total of 83.3% of our patients showed a positive antibody response after three doses of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. A sustained immune response was observed in both groups over the observation period, with liver transplant recipients showing higher levels than lung transplant recipients. This study is among the first to show long-term data with constantly elevated or even increasing antibody levels. We conclude that this effect is most likely associated with repeated boostering in terms of infections and booster vaccinations.

Is There a Difference in Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination between Liver and Lung Transplant Patients with Cystic Fibrosis?

People with Cystic Fibrosis (CF), especially solid organ transplant recipients, have been prioritized in the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination program. This study assesses antibody response of patients with CF who have undergone liver (CF-LI) or lung (CF-LU) transplantation, and compares results to published data of patients with solid organ transplantation without CF as underlying disease. Antibodies against the spike receptor-binding domain were measured within the routine visits at the CF Centre in Innsbruck, Austria, after the second and third doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines. We report on 13 adult CF patients who are recipients of solid organ transplant, including five CF-LI and eight CF-LU. Overall, 69% had measurable antibody response after two, and 83% after three doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. In CF-LI, positive serological response amounted to 100% after two and three doses, while CF-LU showed only a 50% and a 71% response rate, respectively. Clear differences are seen between the CF-LI and CF-LU groups in our cohort, with worse response rate for lung transplant recipients. Immune response between CF-LI and CF-LU, therefore, must be considered in a differentiated manner, and the importance of booster vaccination is once more emphasized with these data.

Early and sustained improvements of lung clearance index from two to sixteen weeks of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor therapy in patients with cystic fibrosis-a real world study.

Since the introduction of CFTR modulator therapies, longitudinal real-life data of lung clearance index (LCI) during treatment is scarce. In this single-centre, post-approval setting, we report data of 51 patients with different stages of lung disease, age 2-52 years with repeated measurements of forced expiratory volume as a percentage of the predicted value (ppFEV1) and LCI after 2, 4, and 16 weeks of CFTR modulator treatment and at baseline. In 25 patients during elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) treatment, significant improvements of LCI (median -1.4) and ppFEV1 (median +8.3%) were observed after only 2 weeks, and were maintained after 4 and 16 weeks of treatment (LCI: -2.0, -2.2; ppFEV1: +7.2%, +11.8%). We observed a significant correlation between LCI improvement at week 16 and lower baseline LCI. In 26 younger and healthier patients receiving lumacaftor/ivacaftor (LUM/IVA) treatment, no significant changes of LCI and ppFEV1 occured. With ELX/TEZ/IVA, our data shows rapid, significant improvements of LCI and ppFEV1 already after 2 weeks. Early LCI measurements can help to assess the patient's response to this high-cost therapy.

Personalized medicine with drugs targeting the underlying protein defect in cystic fibrosis: is monitoring of treatment response necessary?

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is caused by two mutations in the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) gene. In the last years, drugs targeting the underlying protein defect like lumacaftor/ivacaftor (LUM/IVA) or tezacaftor/ivacaftor (TEZ/IVA) and more recently elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) were admitted. Outcome parameters evaluating therapy response like forced expiratory pressure in 1 s (FEV1), body mass index (BMI) or the efficacy of CFTR function in sweat glands showed improvement in several cases. Other, CFTR biomarkers were analysed rarely. This prospective observational study was aimed at evaluating CFTR function in patients treated with different CFTR modulators together with common valid clinical outcome parameters at standardized appointments (day 0, week 2, 4, 16). We followed four patients with the same mutation (F508del-CFTR), sex, age and disease severity. Monitoring focused on lung function, gastrointestinal aspects and CFTR function of sweat glands, nasal and intestinal epithelium. Sweat tests were performed by pilocarpine iontophoresis. Nasal potential difference (NPD) measured transepithelial voltage in vivo and potential increased when CFTR function improved. Rectal biopsies were obtained for intestinal current measurements (ICM) ex vivo. Intestinal CFTR function was assessed by stimulating chloride secretion with different reagents. Response to CFTR modulators regarding clinical outcome parameters was rather variable. A sweat chloride reduction of 35.3 mmol/L, nasal CFTR rescue of 4.4% and fivefold higher CFTR function in the intestine was seen at week 16 post-LUM/IVA. Due to our monitoring, we identified a non-responder to LUM/IVA and TEZ/IVA. In case of ELX/TEZ/IVA, clinical parameters and CFTR bioassays improved and were concordant. Although our cohort is small, results emphasize that non-responders exist and conclusions could not be drawn if patients were not monitored. Data on CFTR function can confirm or disprove ongoing CFTR dysfunction and might be helpful selectively. Non-responders need other alternative therapy options as demonstrated with ELX/TEZ/IVA.

REAL-world clinical effectiveness of ivacaftor therapy in the first 24 months in two infants with cystic fibrosis and different gating mutations-A case report.

This study summarizes efficacy of ivacaftor treatment in 2 infants in a real-world setting. A distinct decline of sweat chloride and lung clearance index plus increase in fecal elastase was seen. The results underline the early and sustainable effect and give cause for discussing whether a reduction in standard cystic fibrosis therapy is possible.

Malignancies in patients with cystic fibrosis: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Previous reports have shown an increased number of colorectal cancers in patients with cystic fibrosis. We assessed the database of our cystic fibrosis center to identify patients with all kinds of cancer retrospectively. All patients visiting the Cystic Fibrosis Centre Innsbruck between 1995 and 2019 were included. CASE PRESENTATION: Among 229 patients with cystic fibrosis treated at the Cystic Fibrosis Centre in Innsbruck between 1995 and 2019, 11 subjects were diagnosed with a malignant disease. The median age at diagnosis was 25.2 years (mean 24.3 years). There were four gynecological malignancies (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer), two hematological malignancies (acute lymphocytic leukemia), one gastrointestinal malignancy (peritoneal mesothelioma), and four malignancies from other origins (malignant melanoma, neuroblastoma, adrenocortical carcinoma, and thyroid cancer). One malignancy occurred after lung transplantation. There was a strong preponderance of females, with 10 of the 11 cases occurring in women. Six deaths were attributed to cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Most diagnoses were made below 30 years of age, and half of the subjects died from the malignant disease. Awareness of a possible malignancy is needed in patients with atypical symptoms. Regular screenings for cancer should also be considered, not only for gastrointestinal tumors.