Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Circulation ; 127(7): 820-31, 2013 Feb 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23277307

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies from the balloon angioplasty and bare metal stent eras have demonstrated that coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is cost-effective compared with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients undergoing multivessel coronary revascularization-particularly among patients with complex coronary artery disease or diabetes mellitus. Whether these results apply in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 2005 and 2010, 1900 patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel coronary artery disease were randomized to PCI with DES (DES-PCI; n=953) or CABG (n=947). Costs were assessed from the perspective of the U.S. health care system. Health state utilities were assessed using the EuroQOL 5 dimension 3 level questionnaire. A patient-level microsimulation model based on U.S. life-tables and in-trial results was used to estimate lifetime cost-effectiveness. Although initial procedural costs were lower for CABG, total costs for the index hospitalization were $8622 higher per patient. Over the next 5 years, follow-up costs were higher with PCI, owing to more frequent repeat revascularization and higher outpatient medication costs. Nonetheless, cumulative 5-year costs remained $3641 higher per patient with CABG. Although there were only modest gains in survival with CABG during the trial period, when the in-trial results were extended to a lifetime horizon, CABG was projected to be economically attractive relative to DES-PCI, with substantial gains in both life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios <$10 000 per life-year or quality-adjusted life-year gained across a broad range of assumptions regarding the effect of CABG on post-trial survival and costs. CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher initial costs, CABG is a highly cost-effective revascularization strategy compared with DES-PCI for patients with diabetes mellitus and multivessel coronary artery disease. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinical-trials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00086450.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/economia , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/economia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/economia , Angiopatias Diabéticas/economia , Stents Farmacológicos/economia , Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/mortalidade , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/mortalidade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/mortalidade , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/economia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/mortalidade , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/mortalidade , Angiopatias Diabéticas/mortalidade , Angiopatias Diabéticas/cirurgia , Angiopatias Diabéticas/terapia , Stents Farmacológicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...