Prescribing patterns and determinants for elderly patients with Parkinson's disease in Japan: a retrospective observational study using insurance claims databases.

Background: This study aimed to determine real-world prescribing patterns and determinants for Japanese patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), with a focus on patients ≥75 years. Methods: This was a retrospective, observational, longitudinal study of patients with PD (≥30 years, ICD-10: G20 excluding Parkinson's syndrome) from three Japanese nationwide healthcare claim databases. Prescription drugs were tabulated using database receipt codes. Changes in treatment patterns were analyzed using network analysis. Factors associated with prescribing patterns and prescription duration were analyzed using multivariable analysis. Results: Of 18 million insured people, 39,731 patients were eligible for inclusion (≥75-year group: 29,130; <75-year group: 10,601). PD prevalence was 1.21/100 people ≥75 years. Levodopa was the most commonly prescribed anti-PD drug (total: 85.4%; ≥75 years: 88.3%). Network analysis of prescribing patterns showed that most elderly patients switched from levodopa monotherapy to adjunct prescription patterns, as did younger patients, but with less complexity. Elderly patients who newly initiated PD treatment remained on levodopa monotherapy longer than younger patients; factors significantly associated with levodopa prescriptions were older age and cognitive impairment. Commonly prescribed adjunct therapies were monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors, non-ergot dopamine agonists, and zonisamide, regardless of age. Droxidopa and amantadine were prescribed as adjunct levodopa therapy slightly more frequently among elderly patients; levodopa adjunct therapy was prescribed when the levodopa dose was 300 mg, regardless of age. Conclusion: Prescribing patterns for patients ≥75 years were levodopa centered and less complex than for those <75 years. Factors significantly associated with levodopa monotherapy and continued use of levodopa were older age and cognitive disorder. Clinical trial registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000053425 (UMIN000046823).

Survey on the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patients with Parkinson's Disease and Their Caregivers in Japan.

Objective: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic changed the lives of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and their caregivers. This study aimed to investigate changes in patient behavior and PD symptoms and their effect on caregiver burden resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. Methods: This nationwide, observational, cross-sectional survey included patients with self-reported PD and caregivers (members of the Japan Parkinson's Disease Association). The primary objective was to evaluate changes in behaviors, self-assessed PD symptoms, and caregiver burden from pre-COVID-19 (February 2020) to post-national state of emergency (August 2020 and February 2021). Results: Responses from 1883 patients and 1382 caregivers from 7610 distributed surveys were analyzed. Mean (standard deviation) age of patients and caregivers was 71.6 (8.2) and 68.5 (11.4) years, respectively; 41.6% of patients had a Hoehn and Yahr (HY) scale of 3. Patients (>40.0%) reported decreased frequency of going out. Most patients (>70.0%) reported no change in treatment visit frequency, voluntary training, or rehabilitation and nursing care insurance services. Symptoms worsened for approximately 7-30% of patients; the proportion with HY scale 4-5 increased from pre-COVID-19 (25.2%) to February 2021 (40.1%). Aggravated symptoms included bradykinesia, walking, gait speed, depressed mood, fatigue, and apathy. Caregivers' burden increased because of patients' worsened symptoms and reduced time going out. Conclusion: Control measures during infectious disease epidemics should consider that patients' symptoms may worsen; therefore, patient and caregiver support is needed to reduce burden of care.

The Assessment of the Diagnostic Delay in Japanese People with Parkinson's Disease Using a Web-based Survey of Patients and Physicians.

Objective Although diagnostic criteria of Parkinson's disease (PD) have been established, the details of the process by which patients notice symptoms, visit a physician, and receive a diagnosis of PD is unclear. We therefore explored factors influencing latency in diagnosing PD. Methods We performed an internet-based survey of patients with PD and their families as well as physicians treating patients with PD to identify any diagnostic latency and its determinants. Evaluated factors included motor and non-motor symptoms, the diagnosis history and symptoms, patients' feelings toward PD prior to the diagnosis, and physician-determined reasons for the diagnostic delay. Results Among the 186 eligible patient respondents (including 87 responses from family members of patients), 24% received a PD diagnosis >1 year after the onset of PD-related symptoms, 58.6% had mid- or late-stage PD at the diagnosis, and 29% of patients had initially thought their symptoms were common age-related phenomena. Tremor (42%) was the most frequent symptom that led patients to visit a medical institution, whereas gait disturbance (14%) was the least frequent. More patients diagnosed with early-stage PD than those diagnosed with mid- or late-stage PD consulted a neurologist at their first visit. Among the 331 eligible physicians, patients' misinterpretation of their symptoms as being age-related was deemed one of or the most common cause (s) of a diagnostic delay by 67% and 36%, respectively. Conclusion Patients' insufficient or misinterpreted information about PD may cause delays in accessing healthcare services, leading to diagnostic delay.

Rasagiline as Adjunct to Levodopa for Treatment of Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Rasagiline is a selective, irreversible monoamine oxidase type B inhibitor used as monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease and as an adjunct therapy to levodopa in Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations. Objectives: This meta-analysis aimed to provide updated evidence on the efficacy for motor and nonmotor symptoms and the safety of rasagiline/levodopa versus levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease experiencing motor fluctuations. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted (January 18-19, 2021) using PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to identify randomized controlled trials comparing rasagiline/levodopa versus placebo/levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease experiencing motor fluctuations. Outcomes included change in wearing-off time, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)/Movement Disorder Society-UPDRS (MDS-UPDRS) II and III scores, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) summary index score. A random effect model was used to estimate the treatment effects. Results: Six studies were included (1912 patients). Significant improvements in wearing-off time (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.92 to -0.09, p = 0.002), levodopa dosage (SMD: -0.18, 95% CI: -0.35 to -0.01, p = 0.041), UPDRS/MDS-UPDRS II (SMD: -0.39, 95% CI: -0.52 to -0.25, p < 0.0001), UPDRS/MDS-UPDRS III (SMD: -0.30, 95% CI: -0.44 to -0.16, p < 0.0001), and PDQ-39 summary index score (SMD: -0.21, 95% CI: -0.37 to -0.04, p = 0.013) were observed with rasagiline/levodopa versus placebo/levodopa. The incidence of TEAEs did not differ between treatments (risk ratio: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.98-1.30, p = 0.093). Conclusions: This meta-analysis further indicated the superiority of rasagiline/levodopa in improving motor and nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson's disease, with a similar safety profile to that of levodopa in Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations.

Treatment Satisfaction and Its Influencing Factors in Parkinson's Disease: A Web-Based Survey of Patients and Physicians in Clinical Practice in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to gain an understanding of patient and physician satisfaction with overall treatment and routine consultations for Parkinson's disease in clinical practice. METHODS: This observational, cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted in Japan from February to March 2019. Eligible patients with Parkinson's disease (N = 186) and physicians who treat patients with Parkinson's disease (N = 331) were asked to evaluate their satisfaction with treatment, consultation, symptom control, and use of a symptom diary. RESULTS: Patients had a mean age of 62.7 years, 54.8% were male, and most (75.8%) had Hoehn and Yahr stage ≥3 symptoms. Physicians were mostly male (93.1%) and had treated 52 patients with Parkinson's disease in the last 6 months, and 34.1% were certified neurologists. There were significant gaps between patient and physician satisfaction with treatment and consultations. Patient and physician satisfaction with overall treatment was significantly lower for patients with Hoehn and Yahr stage ≥3 symptoms than stage 1-2 symptoms (patients: 53.9% vs. 71.1%; physicians: 43.2% vs. 69.7%, respectively). The proportion of patients who were satisfied with symptom control was lower than that of physicians (26.4% vs. 51.5%). Influencing factors for patient satisfaction with treatment were nonmotor symptoms (e.g., insomnia and depression). Satisfaction tended to be higher for patients and physicians when symptom diaries were used. CONCLUSION: Significant gaps in perceptions of treatment and consultation exist between patients and physicians in Parkinson's disease. Physicians should participate in shared decision making with their patients and consider strategies for management of nonmotor symptoms and nonpharmacological therapies and encourage the use of symptom diaries.

Effects of rasagiline on Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) emotional well-being domain in patients with Parkinson's disease: A post-hoc analysis of clinical trials in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Identifying the factors that influence health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is of great scientific interest, but a potential causal relationship between treatment and HRQoL has yet to be fully elucidated. Japanese patients reported better HRQoL outcomes on the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) emotional well-being domain, a 6-question subset of the PDQ-39 which is considered to reflect the emotional aspects of the disease-specific HRQoL, when treated with rasagiline, than placebo, in both a monotherapy clinical trial (NCT02337725) and an adjunctive therapy clinical trial in patients with wearing-off phenomena (NCT02337738). OBJECTIVE: To investigate how rasagiline exerts its effect on the PDQ-39 emotional well-being domain in Japanese patients with Parkinson's disease. METHODS: A path analysis was performed to assess the direct treatment effects of rasagiline on the PDQ-39 emotional well-being domain and the effects mediated indirectly through the influence on items related to motor symptoms by a post-hoc analysis of two clinical trials in Japan. RESULTS: In the monotherapy trial, the PDQ-39 emotional well-being domain was mainly affected indirectly through items related to motor symptoms (80.7%) composed of the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part II (67.2%) and Part III (13.5%). In the adjunctive therapy trial, the PDQ-39 emotional well-being domain was also mainly influenced indirectly through effects on items related to motor symptoms (1 mg/day: 54.7%, 0.5 mg/day: 57.6%) composed of MDS-UPDRS Part II (1 mg/day: 35.6%, 0.5 mg/day: 40.9%), Part III (1 mg/day: 8.0%, 0.5 mg/day: 8.3%) and mean daily OFF-time (1 mg/day: 11.1%, 0.5 mg/day: 8.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The effects of rasagiline on the PDQ-39 emotional well-being domain were mediated primarily by influence on the subjective aspects of motor experiences of daily living.

Prescription pattern of anti-Parkinson's disease drugs in Japan based on a nationwide medical claims database.

INTRODUCTION: Parkinson's disease (PD) treatment should follow guidelines and be tailored to each patient. Large database analyses can provide insights into prescribing patterns. METHODS: Retrospective, cross-sectional study of patients (≥30 years) with PD diagnosis (ICD-10; schizophrenia/cerebrovascular disease excluded) using health insurance claims data (April 2008-December 2016) from the Japan Medical Data Vision database. Prescription patterns of anti-PD drugs were analysed by patient age and sex, calendar year, and overall. RESULTS: The analysis comprised 155,493 PD patient-years (56.1% women, mean 73.4 years). Patient number increased each year, mainly because of database expansion. L-dopa as monotherapy was the most common prescription (22.7% of patient-years); non-ergot dopamine agonists (DAs) were also common (7.6% as monotherapy, 6.8% with L-dopa). Monotherapy was prescribed for ~50% of patient-years, two drugs for 14.1%, and at least three drugs for 18.4%. Consistent with Japanese guidelines, L-dopa was mostly prescribed to older patients (≥60 years), whereas non-ergot DAs were mostly prescribed to middle-aged patients (peak at 50-69 years). Between 2008 and 2011, L-dopa prescription decreased while that of non-ergot DAs increased; this pattern reversed between 2012 and 2016. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that Japanese clinicians are adhering to Japanese guidelines and tailoring anti-PD treatment to individual patients.

Adherence to treatment guideline recommendations for Parkinson's disease in Japan: A longitudinal analysis of a nationwide medical claims database between 2008 and 2016.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to the 2011 Japanese guidelines for treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) in real-life practice is unknown. METHODS: In this retrospective longitudinal observational study, we examined patterns and trends in anti-PD drug prescriptions in 20,936 patients (≥30 years of age with newly diagnosed PD [International Classification of Diseases-Tenth code G20 or PD Hoehn and Yahr scale 1-5] and one or more prescriptions) using nationwide registry data between 2008 and 2016. Data are presented as descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Half (49.6%) of the patients received levodopa (L-dopa) monotherapy, followed by non-ergot dopamine agonists (DA) prescribed as monotherapy (8.3%) or with L-dopa (8.1%). Consistent with the guidelines, 75% of patients were prescribed within 13 days of initial diagnosis; L-dopa monotherapy was the most prescribed drug in patients ≥70 years of age, whereas non-ergot DA monotherapy was more likely to be prescribed than L-dopa in patients between 30 and 50 years of age. Inconsistent with the guidelines, L-dopa monotherapy was the most prescribed drug in patients between 51 and 69 years of age. Over the course of 4 years of treatment, the prescription rate of L-dopa monotherapy and non-ergot DA monotherapy decreased by 63.7% and 44.1%, respectively, whereas that of L-dopa and non-ergot DA combination therapy increased by 103.7%. Combination therapy with L-dopa, non-ergot DA, and monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors was gradually increased at a later stage. CONCLUSION: These results highlight that the state of PD treatment in Japan adheres to most of the recommendations in the 2011 national guidelines, but also precedes the 2018 guidelines.