RESUMO
Background: Approximately 15% of migraine sufferers need preventative medicine because they have more than two episodes each month. Migraine is a regular, persistent condition that frequently makes victims helpless. Numerous drugs from various classes have so far been used in migraine prophylaxis. Their effectiveness is recurrently overshadowed by their side effects because they must be used for a long time, which occasionally necessitates stopping the drug. Materials and Methods: In the tertiary care teaching hospital's department of medicine, a prospective, comparative, open-label study was initiated. Two groups of 80 patients were randomly chosen. For 3 months, the 40 patients in Group A were given a tablet of amitriptyline 10 mg once daily, whereas the 40 patients in Group B were given a tablet of propranolol 20 mg once a day. At the conclusion of the fourth, eighth, and twelfth weeks, the patients' own self-assessment migraine diary and a 4-point pain scale were used to grade the intensity of the headaches. Results: As a result, in Group A, the mean migraine attack severity in periods 1 and 2 was 5.88 2.69 and 5.41 2.48, respectively. In Group B, the mean was 5.15 2.75 in period 1 and 5.66 2.78 in period 2, respectively. The average length of a migraine attack in Group A was 20.30 5.61 h in period 1 and 16.75 5.23 h in period 2. In Group B, the mean was 16.59 3.21 in period 1 and 18.78 5.14 in period 2. Between groups A and B, there was a statistically significant difference. Conclusion: The average number of migraine attacks reduced in the amitriptyline and propranolol groups as the treatment duration increased. Amitriptyline is a popular medication with established effectiveness and manageable levels of negative side effects. It is the tricyclic antidepressant that is most frequently used to prevent headaches. When administered for migraine prevention, it generates a quick response within 3 months. Propranolol is less effective than amitriptyline at reducing the frequency, length, and severity of episodes.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Hepatitis A virus infections are mostly asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic, and generally this disease has a benign course and resolves spontaneously. However, intrahepatic and rarer extrahepatic manifestations can complicate typical cases of acute hepatitis. Pleural effusion is an extremely rare extrahepatic entity with 20 cases reported in literature. CASE PRESENTATION: We report herein a recent case of both pleural effusion and ascites accompanying hepatitis A infection in a 5-year-old middle eastern child, diagnosed using serological testing and imaging studies, who was treated with supportive management with full resolution after 2 weeks. In addition, we review available literature regarding hepatitis A virus associated with pleural effusion using PubMed and summarize all reported cases in a comprehensive table. RESULTS: Literature contains 20 reported cases of serology-confirmed hepatitis A virus presenting with pleural effusion, most in the pediatric population with average age at presentation of 9 years 8 months. The majority of reported patients had right-sided pleural effusion (50%) or bilateral effusion (45%), while only 5% presented with pleural effusion on the left side. Hepatomegaly and ascites occurred concurrently in 80% and 70% respectively. Supportive treatment without invasive procedures (except one chylothorax case) yielded complete recovery in 95% of cases, while only one case progressed to fulminant liver failure followed by death. CONCLUSION: Acute hepatitis A virus rarely presents with pleural effusion, usually following a benign course with spontaneous resolution in most patients. Pleural effusion does not change the prognosis or require any invasive treatment. Thus, further invasive procedures are not recommended and would only complicate this self-resolving benign condition.
