Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Exp Dermatol ; 48(6): 674-675, 2023 Jun 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36805631

RESUMO

Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is the treatment of choice for high-risk basal cell carcinoma (BCC). However, there are no evidence-based recommendations regarding which biopsy type is more appropriate to obtain tumour samples prior to MMS. Shave or punch biopsies are performed depending on the clinical characteristics of the tumour, surgeon experience and local protocols. However, biopsy type might result in difficult histopathological interpretation and influence the practical implementation of MMS. We performed a retrospective study on 208 consecutive BCCs treated with MMS. Of the 208 BCC biopsies, 42 (20.2%) were obtained by the shave method and 166 (79.8%) via punch. Those obtained with the shave technique had a mean of 1.64 stages vs. 1.69 stages with the punch technique (P = 0.130). These findings suggest biopsy type does not affect Mohs surgery performance. The biopsy type of choice is the one deemed adequate for each specific case to obtain a diagnosis and tumour subtyping.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Basocelular , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Cirurgia de Mohs/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Carcinoma Basocelular/cirurgia , Carcinoma Basocelular/patologia , Biópsia
2.
Santiago de Chile; SERNAM; 1995. [60] p. (Documentos de Trabajo, 40).
Monografia em Espanhol | MINSALCHILE | ID: biblio-1541838
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA