Risk assessment of survival and morbidity of infants born at <24 completed weeks of gestation.

BACKGROUND: Infants born at the threshold of viability have a high risk of mortality and morbidity. The British Association of Perinatal Medicine (BAPM) provided updated guidance in 2019 advising a risk-based approach to balancing decisions about active versus redirected care at birth. AIMS: To determine survival and morbidity of infants born between 22 and 24 completed weeks of gestation. To develop a scoring system to categorise infants at birth according to risk for mortality or severe adverse outcome. METHODS: A retrospective, single centre observational study of infants who received neonatal care from 2011 to 2021. Data were collected on mortality, morbidity and two-year neurodevelopmental outcomes. Each infant was risk categorised utilising the proposed tools in the BAPM (2019) framework. A composite adverse score for either dying or surviving with severe impairment was created. RESULTS: Four infants born at 22 weeks, 49 at 23 weeks and 105 at 24 weeks of gestation were included. The mortality rate was 23.4 %. Following risk categorisation there were 8 (5.1 %) extremely high risk, 44 (27.8 %) high risk and 106 (67.1 %) moderate risk infants. The rate of dying or surviving with severe impairment for extremely high risk, high risk and moderate risk were 100 %, 88.9 % and 53 % respectively. The proportions with the composite adverse outcome differed significantly according to the risk category (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: When applying a scoring system to risk categorise infants at birth, high rates of dying or surviving with severe impairment were found in infants born at 22 or 23 weeks of gestation.

Pilot feasibility study of a digital technology approach to the systematic electronic capture of parent-reported data on cognitive and language development in children aged 2 years.

BACKGROUND: The assessment of language and cognition in children at risk of impaired neurodevelopment following neonatal care is a UK standard of care but there is no national, systematic approach for obtaining these data. To overcome these challenges, we developed and evaluated a digital version of a validated parent questionnaire to assess cognitive and language development at age 2 years, the Parent Report of Children's Abilities-Revised (PARCA-R). METHODS: We involved clinicians and parents of babies born very preterm who received care in north-west London neonatal units. We developed a digital version of the PARCA-R questionnaire using standard software. Following informed consent, parents received automated notifications and an invitation to complete the questionnaire on a mobile phone, tablet or computer when their child approached the appropriate age window. Parents could save and print a copy of the results. We evaluated ease of use, parent acceptability, consent for data sharing through integration into a research database and making results available to the clinical team. RESULTS: Clinical staff approached the parents of 41 infants; 38 completed the e-registration form and 30 signed the e-consent. The digital version of the PARCA-R was completed by the parents of 21 of 23 children who reached the appropriate age window. Clinicians and parents found the system easy to use. Only one parent declined permission to integrate data into the National Neonatal Research Database for approved secondary purposes. DISCUSSION: This electronic data collection system and associated automated processes enabled efficient systematic capture of data on language and cognitive development in high-risk children, suitable for national delivery at scale.

Cumulative hypoxia, socioeconomic deprivation and neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants.

BACKGROUND: Hypoxia can adversely affect cognition, while socioeconomic deprivation has also been associated with impaired neurodevelopment in the newborn. We aimed to assess the impact of hypoxia and socioeconomic deprivation on the neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study at a tertiary neonatal unit between 2015 and 2018. The motor, cognitive and language domain scores of the Bayley-III assessment were recorded at 24 months of corrected gestational age. The percentage of time with pulse oximetry (SpO2) < 75% was measured from the nursing records, from admission to 36 weeks postmenstrual age in infants born < 30 weeks gestational age. The multiple deprivation index (MDI) and the main care giver's education domain of the MDI were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 93,767 data points from 80 infants (34 male) with a median (IQR) gestational age of 27.9(25.9-29.0) weeks and a birth weight of 0.94(0.74-1.23) kg were analysed. The median (IQR) motor score [103(91-110)] was significantly related to the median (IQR) time with SpO2 < 75% [1.5(0.9-3.4)%, adjusted p = 0.020]. The median (IQR) cognitive score [100(90-105)] was negatively significantly related to the time with SpO2 < 75% (adjusted p = 0.012) and the median (IQR) education decile of the MDI [7(6-9), adjusted p = 0.011]. The median (IQR) language score [91(77-100)] was significantly positively related to the education domain of the MDI (adjusted p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Hypoxia in preterm infants exerted a negative impact on motor function and cognition and conversely, higher educational attainment had a positive impact on cognition and language.

Introduction of 24 h Resident Consultant Cover in a Tertiary Neonatal Unit-Impact on Mortality and Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine whether the introduction of 24 h cover by resident consultants in a tertiary neonatal unit affected mortality and other clinical outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study in a tertiary medical and surgical neonatal unit between 2010-2020 of all liveborn infants admitted to the neonatal unit. Out of hours cover was rearranged in 2014 to ensure 24 h presence of a senior trained neonatologist (resident consultant). RESULTS: In the study period, 4778 infants were included: 2613 in the pre-resident period and 2165 in the resident period. The median (IQR) time to first consultation by a senior member of staff was significantly longer in the pre-resident period [1.5 (0.6-4.3) h] compared to the resident period [0.5 (0.3-1.5) h, p < 0.001]. Overall, mortality was similar in the pre-resident and the resident periods (3.2% versus 2.3%, p = 0.077), but the mortality of infants born at night was significantly higher in the pre-resident (4.5%) compared to the resident period (2.5%, p = 0.016). The resident period was independently associated with an increased survival to discharge (adjusted p < 0.001, odds ratio: 2.0) after adjusting for gestational age, admission temperature and duration of ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Following introduction of a resident consultant model the mortality and time to consultation after admission decreased.

Endotracheal intubation in a neonatal population remains associated with a high risk of adverse events.

INTRODUCTION: There has been a significant increase in premedication use for neonatal intubation in the UK over the past decade. We aimed to determine the adverse events during neonatal intubation using the most commonly used premedication regimen in the UK. DISCUSSION: We prospectively studied all intubations performed using morphine, suxamethonium and atropine during a 3-month period in three UK tertiary neonatal units. Premedication was administered for 87/93 (94%) of intubations. Median time taken to prepare premedication was 16 min (IQR 10-35). Median time to successful intubation was 5 min (IQR 2-9) following premedication. Median lowest recorded oxygen saturation after administration of premedication was 65% (IQR 39-85). A bradycardia in the range 61-99/min accompanied the procedure in 24/93 (26%) intubations, with a median duration of bradycardia of 8 s (IQR 1-10). CONCLUSION: Despite the widespread move to premedication for neonatal intubation, many deficiencies in everyday practice remain. The rate of haemodynamic complications is high in this commonly used premedication regimen. This study shows that there are important factors to control at the local level in terms of timely preparation and administration of premedication drugs, training and supervision of staff carrying out this high-risk procedure.