Prevention of cardiotoxicity in childhood cancer survivors: in physical exercise, we trust.

In recent years, the mean survival rate of children after a cancer diagnosis has significantly improved. At the same time, a growing interest in short and long-term cardiovascular (CV) complications of cancer therapy, as well as long-term CV risk in childhood cancer survivors (CCS) developed, along with proposals of protocols for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of cancer therapy-related CV toxicity (CTR-CVT) in this population. Many clinical and individual risk factors for CTR-CVT have been identified, and a non-negligible prevalence of traditional CV risk factors has been described in this population, potentially associated with a further worsening in both CTR-CVT and long-term CV risk. Physical exercise (PE) represents a promising, free-of-cost and free-of-complications, helpful therapy for primary and secondary prevention of CTR-CVT in CCS. The present narrative review aims to summarize the most critical evidence available about CTR-CVT in CCS, focusing on the role of PE in this clinical scenario.

Sex Differences in Heart Failure: What Do We Know?

Heart failure (HF) remains an important global health issue, substantially contributing to morbidity and mortality. According to epidemiological studies, men and women face nearly equivalent lifetime risks for HF. However, their experiences diverge significantly when it comes to HF subtypes: men tend to develop HF with reduced ejection fraction more frequently, whereas women are predominantly affected by HF with preserved ejection fraction. This divergence underlines the presence of numerous sex-based disparities across various facets of HF, encompassing aspects such as risk factors, clinical presentation, underlying pathophysiology, and response to therapy. Despite these apparent discrepancies, our understanding of them is far from complete, with key knowledge gaps still existing. Current guidelines from various professional societies acknowledge the existence of sex-based differences in HF management, yet they are lacking in providing explicit, actionable recommendations tailored to these differences. In this comprehensive review, we delve deeper into these sex-specific differences within the context of HF, critically examining associated definitions, risk factors, and therapeutic strategies. We provide a specific emphasis on aspects exclusive to women, such as the impact of pregnancy-induced hypertension and premature menopause, as these unique factors warrant greater attention in the broader HF discussion. Additionally, we aim to clarify ongoing controversies and knowledge gaps pertaining to the pharmacological treatment of HF and the sex-specific indications for cardiac implantable electronic devices. By shining a light on these issues, we hope to stimulate a more nuanced understanding and promote the development of more sex-responsive approaches in HF management.

Left Ventricular Unloading With an IABP in Patients Undergoing Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation With ECMO Support.

OBJECTIVE: The authors investigated the preprocedural predictors of postprocedural intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) need in patients undergoing transcatheter ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation on venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Hybrid operating room and intensive care unit of a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Participants were 121 consecutive patients with unstable VT undergoing transcatheter ablation with VA-ECMO. INTERVENTIONS: In patients with postprocedural echocardiographic, radiographic, or hemodynamic signs of increased left ventricle afterload, an IABP was positioned. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients in the IABP group were more frequently on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (58% v 37%; p = 0.03) and had lower median baseline ejection fraction (25% v 28% p = 0.05), larger end-diastolic diameter (69.7 mm ± 13.0 v 65.7 mm ± 11.3; p = 0.03), and more frequent ischemic etiology as the reason for dilated cardiomyopathy (76% v 47%; p = 0.04,) when compared with patients not requiring IABP. Postoperatively, the IABP group required longer mechanical ventilation (24 hours [20-56.5] v 23 hours [15-28]; p = 0.003), intensive care unit stay (78 hours [46-174] v 48 hours [24-72]; p < 0.001), and continuous renal replacement therapy (13.3% v 1.3%; p = 0.006). By multivariate analysis, end-diastolic diameter (odds ratio [OR]:1.08; confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-1.16; p = 0.049), ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (OR: 8.40; CI: 2.15-32.88; p = 0.002), and more-than-moderate mitral regurgitation (OR: 4.83; CI: 1.22-19.22; p = 0.025) were independent predictors of need for IABP. CONCLUSIONS: The need for an IABP to unload the left ventricle can be predicted by ventricular size, medium-severe mitral valvular defect, and ischemic etiology of the dilated cardiomyopathy.