A novel prothrombin time method to measure all non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulants (NOACs).

BACKGROUND: There is a clinical need for point-of-care (POC) methods for non-vitamin K-dependent oral anticoagulants (NOACs). We modified a routine POC procedure: Zafena's Simple Simon™ PT-INR, a room-temperature, wet-chemistry prothrombin time method of the Owren-type. METHODS: To either increase or decrease NOAC interference, two assay variants were devised by replacing the standard 10 µL end-to-end capillary used to add the citrated plasma sample to 200 µL of prothrombin time (PT) reagent by either a 20 µL or a 5 µL capillary. All assay variants were calibrated to show correct PT results in plasma samples from healthy and warfarin-treated persons. RESULTS: For plasmas spiked with dabigatran, apixaban, or rivaroxaban, the 20 µL variant showed markedly higher PT results than the 5 µL. The effects were even more pronounced at room temperature than at +37 °C. In plasmas from patients treated with NOACs (n = 30 for each) there was a strong correlation between the PT results and the concentration of NOACs as determined by the central hospital laboratory. For the 20 µL variant the PT response of linear correlation coefficient averaged 0.90. The PT range was INR 1.1-2.1 for dabigatran and apixaban, and INR 1.1-5.0 for rivaroxaban. Using an INR ratio between the 20 µL and 5 µL variants (PTr20/5) made the NOAC assay more robust and independent of the patient sample INR value in the absence of NOAC. Detection limits were 80 µg/L for apixaban, 60 µg/L for dabigatran, and 20 µg/L for rivaroxaban. CONCLUSIONS: A wet-chemistry POC PT procedure was modified to measure the concentrations of three NOACs using a single reagent.

Comparison of prothrombin time (INR) results and main characteristics of patients on warfarin treatment in primary health care centers and anticoagulation clinics.

BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulant therapy is used to prevent thrombosis in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), venous thrombosis and prosthetic heart valves. The introduction of new therapies emphasizes the need to discern the best practice for the patients remaining on warfarin treatment. This study compares patient characteristics and therapeutic control in two settings managing warfarin treatment: Swedish primary health care centers (PHCC) and specialized anticoagulation clinics (ACC). METHODS: Prothrombin time (PT) test results reported as International Normalized Ratio (INR) were collected for five consecutive days from patients on warfarin treatment; 564 PHCC and 927 ACC patients. Therapeutic control was calculated as PT test results in relation to intended therapeutic range (TR). Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test and Chi2 test were used for statistical comparisons. RESULTS: The PHCC patients were older than the ACC patients, 76 v. 70 years (p<0.01) with a predominance of men in both groups. The reasons for treating differed between the groups. Seventy-two percent of PHCC patients and 66% of ACC patients had a PT-INR within the intended TR (p<0.05). Men generally had better results than women (72% v. 63%, p<0.001) and particularly in the PHCC group v. the ACC group (78% v. 69%, p<0.01).PT-INR above intended TR was significantly more common in the ACC setting, (p<0.05), for women overall (p<0.01), for women in the PHCC setting, and for ACC men (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this study both settings achieved good therapeutic control of warfarin treatment with a minor advantage for PHCC over ACC, and better results for men, especially in the PHCC setting. As patient characteristics differ between the PHCC and ACC, it is important to conduct further randomized studies to discern the best practice locally for warfarin management also after the introduction of new drugs.

A new high-performance liquid chromatographic method for determination of warfarin enantiomers.

Warfarin is the most common agent used for control and prevention of venous as well as arterial thromboembolism. Although warfarin is administered as a racemic mixture of two stereoisomers (S and R), the S-form is mainly responsible for the anticoagulant effect. The anticoagulant effect of the drug is monitored by analysis of prothrombin complex (International Normalised Ratio,INR). In some cases, however, the measurements of plasma warfarin concentration are needed. Here, we present a new, rapid, sensitive and cost-effective HPLC-method for the determination of warfarin enantiomers in plasma. The chromatographic system consisted of Waters 616 gradient pump, Waters 996 photo diode array detector, Gilson 230 autoinjector and Pirkle (R,R) Whelk-O1 column (25 cmx4.6 mm I.D., 5 microm). An isocratic mobile phase of methanol/acetonitrile/water (50/10/40, v/v) with 0.1% glacial acetic acid was used. The follow rate was 1 mL/min. Data analysis was carried out with Waters Millennium32. The absorbance at 305 nm was measured with a total run-time of 15 min. Method linearity was studied by establishing regression data containing eight points over the range 0.08-10 microg/mL. In this range, warfarin showed to be linear (r2=0.9997 for S-warfarin and r2=0.9998 for R-warfarin). The limit of detection in plasma was 16 ng/mL for S-warfarin and 18 ng/mL for R-warfarin. Limit of quatitation was defined as 10xLOD. The extraction recovery was approximately 80%. Also the relation between INR and warfarin concentration was investigated. As expected, there was a low correlation between these two variables (r=0.23, y=0.3044x+0.9712). This method offers a rapid and cost-effective determination of warfarin enantiomers in human plasma.