Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 15(5): 637-40, 1985 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-4040132

RESUMO

Cerebrospinal fluid of aztreonam were measured in 11 patients with meningeal inflammation. Two to eight hours after a single 2 gm intravenous dose, CSF aztreonam levels ranged from 0.76 to 16.6 mg/l. The mean CSF concentration in four patients with viral meningitis was 1.28 mg/l, which was lower than the mean concentration of 7.2 mg/l in the five with bacterial, cryptococcal or carcinomatous meningitis. Two patients with infected subdural drains were also sampled serially and had CSF levels greater than 1 mg/l between 1 and 8 h post dose. Penetration of aztreonam into the CSF in the presence of meningeal inflammation appears adequate to warrant therapeutic trials in patients infected with susceptible organisms.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Meningite/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Aztreonam , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Meningite/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Meningite Meningocócica/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Meningite Viral/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
2.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 25(1): 16-9, 1984 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6703681

RESUMO

Twice-daily intramuscular ceforanide therapy of Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis in parenteral drug abusers was compared in a randomized prospective trial with intravenous cephapirin therapy. Dosage regimens were ceforanide, 1 g every 12 h, and cephapirin, 2 g every 4 h. Mean minimal inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations of ceforanide for S. aureus treated with ceforanide were 0.78 and 1.56 microgram/ml compared to cephapirin for patient isolates of 0.08 and 0.14 microgram/ml, respectively. Serum killing levels with ceforanide were 1:5.7 and 1:1.5 at peak and trough levels, compared to 1:134 (peak) and 1:4.2 (trough) with cephapirin. Despite this apparent in vitro advantage of cephapirin, patients treated with ceforanide did as well as those with cephapirin. Of 16 ceforanide-treated patients, all responded initially to therapy, and 15 were cured with 28 days of therapy. One patient relapsed at the end of therapy. Of 16 cephapirin-treated patients, 1 was a clinical and microbiological failure, and 3 other relapsed at the end of therapy. In addition, one ceforanide-treated patient and two cephapirin-treated patients developed central nervous system abscesses. These were cured with drainage and continuation of antibiotic therapy. Ceforanide was well tolerated by the intramuscular route. Cost analysis suggests that therapy with intramuscular ceforanide would result in an approximate 70% decrease in drug therapy cost when compared to intravenous cephapirin. Ceforanide appears to be a safe, efficacious, convenient, and relatively inexpensive drug for treating staphylococcal endocarditis in parenteral drug abusers.


Assuntos
Cefamandol/análogos & derivados , Endocardite Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Adulto , Cefamandol/administração & dosagem , Endocardite Bacteriana/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intramusculares , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Distribuição Aleatória , Infecções Estafilocócicas/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...