Biopsychosocial determinants of visuospatial memory performance according to different spaces.

Visuospatial memory (VSM) performance depends on intrinsic (biopsychosocial parameters) and extrinsic (space) factors. We aimed at characterizing the determinants of VSM performance according to space. Young healthy adults, 20 males and 41 females (23 ±â€¯3 years old), were assessed for VSM performance through a pathway learning task, in reaching (eCorsi Block Tapping task) and walking space (Virtual Walking Corsi Task). We evaluated psychosocial factors through seven questionnaires - Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Fatigue Severity Scale, Profile of the Mood States, 2nd edition, short version, Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations, Measurement of Ambiguity Tolerance, Motives for Physical Activities Measure-Revised, mental rotation capabilities and locomotor characteristics (physical activity level through embedded trackers and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, and gait parameters). The most explanatory biopsychosocial determinants of VSM performance were i) mental rotation capabilities and fatigue indicator in reaching space, and ii) mental rotation capabilities and physical activity level (tracked active energy expenditure only) in walking space. These results suggest that specific parameters should be preferred for the evaluation and strengthening of VSM capabilities in both reaching or walking spaces.

Enhanced risk of steroid-resistant acute rejection following pretransplant steroid therapy in liver graft recipients.

Most episodes of acute rejection will resolve after steroid therapy without detrimental consequences on the liver allograft. However, steroid-resistant acute rejection may induce irreversible lesions of the graft and is associated with an increased risk of chronic rejection. The aim of this study was to determine whether there were predictive factors for steroid-resistant acute rejection after liver transplantation. A total of 108 adult liver recipients with a follow-up of at least 2 years have been analyzed; sixty-two (57%) patients had at least one episode of acute rejection. The rates of steroid resistance were 35%, 52% and 83% after a first (n = 62), second (n = 25), or third (n = 7) episode of acute rejection, respectively. Steroid resistance of acute rejection was significantly associated with a past history of pretransplant steroid therapy (P = 0.004). High levels of ALT (P = 0.03) and serum bilirubin (P = 0.002) were also predictive of steroid-resistant acute rejection. Eight (7%) patients eventually developed chronic rejection. Predictive factors for chronic rejection included steroid-resistant acute rejection (P = 0.01), recurrent acute rejection (P = 0.03), and CMV infection (P = 0.01). In conclusion, this study suggests that pretransplant steroid administration or high levels of ALT and bilirubin in rejecting patients are risk factors for steroid resistance and should lead to aggressive antirejection therapy without delay.

[Cytomegalovirus infections in patients after liver transplantation: determination of risk groups]. / Infections à cytomégalovirus chez les transplantés hépatiques: détermination de groupes à risque.

The goal of this study was to identify high-risk groups for cytomegalovirus infection after liver transplantation. Sixty-one patients were evaluated. Twenty-five patients (41 percent) had infection. Among the 16 patients who were seronegative for the virus before transplantation, 11 received a liver graft and blood products from seronegative donors and none of them developed infection. All seronegative recipients of a liver from seropositive donors (5/5) developed primary infection. Among the 45 patients seropositive before transplantation, 20 developed a cytomegalovirus infection, whatever the donor serologic status. The incidence of symptomatic reactivation or reinfection was high (14/20), and, for 12/14 of them, associated with early acute rejection. Two high-risk groups of patients, eligible for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis, were identified: seronegative recipients of seropositive donors and seropositive recipients with early acute rejection.