Dexpramipexole depletes blood and tissue eosinophils in nasal polyps with no change in polyp size.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and eosinophilia is a disease of the upper respiratory tract for which few therapies are available. Because the oral investigational drug dexpramipexole serendipitously decreased blood eosinophils in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis studies, we assessed its safety, eosinophil-lowering activity, and preliminary clinical efficacy in patients with CRSwNP and eosinophilia. METHODS: Sixteen subjects with CRSwNP, absolute eosinophil count (AEC) ≥ 0.300 × 109 /L, and polyp tissue eosinophils were evaluable for efficacy in a 6-month open-label, multi-center study of dexpramipexole 150 mg twice daily. The coprimary endpoints were change in AEC and change in total polyp score (TPS) from baseline to month 6, with additional clinical and histologic endpoints assessed. RESULTS: Thirteen of 16 subjects completed 6 months of dexpramipexole treatment. Geometric mean baseline AEC was 0.525 ± 0.465 eosinophils × 109 /L and decreased to 0.031 ± 0.019 after 6 months of dexpramipexole treatment, a 94% reduction (P < 0.001). Ten of 16 subjects had eosinophil counts reduced to ≤ 0.020 × 109 /L at month 6. In 12 subjects with nasal polyp biopsies at baseline and month 6, tissue eosinophils were reduced from a mean of 168 ± 134 to 5 ± 2 per high-power field (HPF) (P = 0.001), a 97% reduction from baseline. There was no significant reduction in TPS or improvement in other clinical endpoints. Dexpramipexole was well tolerated, with no drug-related serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: Dexpramipexole treatment produced profound eosinophil-lowering in peripheral blood and nasal polyp tissue. Despite the near-elimination of polyp eosinophils, decreased TPS and nasal symptom improvement were not observed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Laryngoscope, 129:E61-E66, 2019.

Dexpramipexole effects on functional decline and survival in subjects with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in a Phase II study: subgroup analysis of demographic and clinical characteristics.

Our objective was to explore treatment effects in patient subgroups using post hoc analyses of data from part 2 of the dexpramipexole Phase II study. Subjects with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) received dexpramipexole 300 mg/day or 50 mg/day for 24 weeks. Treatment effects on the slope of the revised ALS Functional Rating Score (ALSFRS-R) and Combined Assessment of Function and Survival (CAFS) were evaluated in dichotomized subgroups: riluzole use, gender, site of symptom onset. Other subgroups were dichotomized using median baseline values for age, ALSFRS-R, slow vital capacity, symptom duration, diagnostic delay, and progression rate. Results showed that there was a 21% reduction in ALSFRS-R decline favoring the 300-mg vs. 50-mg arm (p = 0.177); mean CAFS ranking was significantly higher in the 300-mg vs. 50-mg arm (52.4 vs. 41.1; p = 0.046). Trends were recapitulated in virtually all subgroups. Generally, ALSFRS-R decline was reduced and CAFS rankings were higher in the 300-mg vs. 50-mg arm across subgroups. CAFS rankings were significantly higher in the 300-mg vs. 50-mg arm among subjects with ALSFRS-R scores ≤35, symptom duration <18.7 months, or progression rate ≥ 0.7 points/month (p < 0.03). In conclusion, the observed benefit of 300- vs. 50-mg dexpramipexole on functional decline and survival was generally consistent among subjects regardless of baseline characteristics.

A comparison of weight change during treatment with olanzapine or aripiprazole: results from a randomized, double-blind study.

BACKGROUND: Weight gain is a side effect of therapy with many atypical antipsychotics and may have important clinical repercussions with respect to long-term health and treatment compliance. The primary objective of this double-blind study was to compare the safety and tolerability of aripiprazole and olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia as evidenced by the percentage of patients exhibiting significant weight gain. METHOD: This was a 26-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial in patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia who were in acute relapse and required hospitalization. Significant weight gain was defined as a > or = 7% increase in body weight from baseline. Body weight, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (CGI-I) assessments were performed at baseline and at regular intervals during the study. The study period was from April 2000 through June 2001. RESULTS: 317 patients were randomly assigned to aripiprazole (N = 156) or olanzapine (N = 161). Compared with those treated with aripiprazole, a greater proportion of patients treated with olanzapine exhibited clinically significant weight gain during the trial. By week 26, 37% of olanzapine-treated patients had experienced significant weight gain compared with 14% of aripiprazole-treated patients (p < .001). Statistically significant differences in mean weight change were observed between treatments beginning at week 1 and sustained throughout the study. At week 26, there was a mean weight loss of 1.37 kg (3.04 lb) with aripiprazole compared with a mean increase of 4.23 kg (9.40 lb) with olanzapine among patients who remained on therapy (p < .001). Changes in fasting plasma levels of total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides were significantly different in the 2 treatment groups, with worsening of the lipid profile among patients treated with olanzapine. There was a consistent and sustained improvement in symptoms in patients who remained on therapy with either olanzapine or aripiprazole as assessed by CGI-I scores and responder rates throughout the study. CONCLUSION: Olanzapine had a greater impact on patients' weight than aripiprazole. Significant differences in favor of aripiprazole were also observed in the effects of therapy on plasma lipid profile. Both treatment groups achieved comparable clinically meaningful improvements on efficacy measures. The observed effects on weight and lipids indicate a potentially lower metabolic and cardiovascular risk in patients treated with aripiprazole compared with those treated with olanzapine.