Temporal trends in outcomes following inpatient transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the growing adoption of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), there remains a lack of clinical data evaluating procedural safety and discharge practices. AIMS: This study aims to investigate if there have been improvements in postoperative clinical outcomes following TAVR. METHODS: In this large-scale, retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent TAVR as an inpatient were identified from 2016 to 2020 using the National Readmissions Database. The primary outcome was temporal trends in the rates of discharge to home. Secondary endpoints assessed annual discharge survival rates, 30-day readmissions, length of stay, and periprocedural cardiac arrest rates. RESULTS: Over the 5-year study period, a total of 31,621 inpatient TAVR procedures were identified. Of these, 79.2 % of patients were successfully discharged home with home disposition increasing year-over-year from 74.5 % in 2016 to 85.9 % in 2020 (Odds ratio: 2.01; 95 % CI 1.62-2.48, p < 0.001). The mean annual discharge survival rate was 97.7 % which did not change significantly over the 5-year study period (p = 0.551). From 2016 to 2020, 30-day readmissions decreased from 14.0 % to 10.3 %, respectively (p = 0.028). Perioperative cardiac arrest occurred in 1.8 % (n = 579) of cases with rates remaining unchanged during the study (p = 0.674). CONCLUSION: Most TAVR patients are successfully discharged alive and home, with decreasing 30-day readmissions observed over recent years. This data suggests potential improvements in preoperative planning, procedural safety, and postoperative care. Despite perioperative cardiac arrest being associated with high mortality, it remains a relatively rare complication of TAVR.

Fatal ventricular arrhythmias in myocarditis: A review of current indications for defibrillator devices.

Historically, patients with myocarditis were considered for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) utilization only in the chronic phase of the disease following the development of persistent cardiomyopathy refractory to medical therapy or occurrence of a major ventricular arrhythmic event. However, recent literature has indicated that ventricular arrhythmias are frequently reported even in the acute phase of the disease, challenging the long-standing perception that this disease process was largely reversible. Given this changing environment of information, the latest US and European guidelines were recently updated in 2022 to now consider ICD implantation during the acute phase which has significantly increased the number of individuals eligible for these devices. Additionally, several studies with small subgroups of patients have demonstrated a possible benefit of wearable cardioverter defibrillators (WCDs) in this patient demographic. Assuming that larger studies confirm their utility, it is possible that WCDs can assist in detection of ventricular arrhythmias and selection of high-risk candidates for ICD implantation, while providing temporary protection for a small percentage of patients before the development of a major arrhythmic event. This review ultimately serves as a comprehensive review of the most recent guidelines for defibrillator use in acute and chronic myocarditis. OPINION STATEMENT: The latest US and European guidelines support ICD use for myocarditis patients following the development of persistent cardiomyopathy refractory to medical therapy or occurrence of a major ventricular arrhythmic event. Previously, patients in the acute phase were excluded from ICD utilization even after experiencing malignant ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation due to the long-standing perception that this disease process was largely reversible. However, recent literature has indicated that ventricular arrhythmias are frequently reported even in the acute phase of the disease. Additionally, we found that the myocardial damage that is inflicted persists many years after the initial episode. Given this changing environment of information, guidelines were recently updated in 2022 to now consider ICD implantation during the acute phase which has significantly increased the number of individuals eligible for these devices. We support possible ICD utilization for secondary prevention during the acute phase of myocarditis given the elevated risk of arrhythmia recurrence and the fact that any ventricular arrhythmia can induce sudden cardiac death. Future prospective studies are needed to assess which patients may benefit most from early ICD implantation. WCDs have improved survival in patient populations at high-risk for sudden cardiac death who are not candidates for ICD implantation. After analyzing several recent studies with small subgroups of patients, WCDs appear to demonstrate similar efficacy for myocarditis patients as well. Assuming that larger studies confirm their utility, we believe that WCDs can assist in detection of ventricular arrhythmias and selection of high-risk candidates for ICD implantation. Furthermore, WCDs have the additional benefit of acting as primary prevention by providing temporary protection for a small percentage of myocarditis patients before they develop a major arrhythmic event.