Sex-differential non-specific effects of adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted rabies vaccines versus placebo on all-cause mortality in dogs (NERVE-Dog study): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial with a nested case-control study.

BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that childhood vaccines in high-mortality populations may have substantial impacts on mortality rates that are not explained by the prevention of targeted diseases, nor conversely by typical expected adverse reactions to the vaccines, and that these non-specific effects (NSEs) are generally more pronounced in females. The existence of these effects, and any implications for the development of vaccines and the design of vaccination programs to enhance safety, remain controversial. One area of controversy is the reported association of non-live vaccines with increased female mortality. In a previous randomized controlled trial (RCT), we observed that non-live alum-adjuvanted animal rabies vaccine (ARV) was associated with increased female but not male mortality in young, free-roaming dogs. Conversely, non-live non-adjuvanted human rabies vaccine (NRV) has been associated with beneficial non-specific effects in children. Alum adjuvant has been shown to suppress Th1 responses to pathogens, leading us to hypothesize that alum-adjuvanted rabies vaccine in young dogs has a detrimental effect on female survival by modulating the immune response to infectious and/or parasitic diseases. In this paper, we present the protocol of a 3-arm RCT comparing the effect of alum-adjuvanted rabies vaccine, non-adjuvanted rabies vaccine and placebo on all-cause mortality in an owned, free-roaming dog population, with causal mediation analysis of the RCT and a nested case-control study to test this hypothesis. METHODS: Randomised controlled trial with a nested case-control study. DISCUSSION: We expect that, among the placebo group, males will have higher mortality caused by higher pathogen loads and more severe disease, as determined by haematological parameters and inflammatory biomarkers. Among females, we expect that there will be no difference in mortality between the NRV and placebo groups, but that the ARV group will have higher mortality, again mediated by higher pathogen loads and more severe disease. We anticipate that these changes are preceded by shifts in key serum cytokine concentrations towards an anti-inflammatory immune response in females. If confirmed, these results will provide a rational basis for mitigation of detrimental NSEs of non-live vaccines in high-mortality populations.

Sex-differential non-specific effects of rabies vaccine in dogs: An extended analysis of a randomized controlled trial in a high-mortality population.

Non-live rabies vaccines have been associated with both beneficial and detrimental effects on host population morbidity and mortality rates to unrelated infections in people and animals, and these non-specific effects may differ by sex. Previous animal studies may have been affected by bias, including selection bias due to loss to follow up in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We previously reported results of an RCT in dogs on the effect of primary rabies vaccine administered at 6 weeks of age on all-cause mortality over a 7-week follow-up period, in a high-mortality population of owned dogs. Here, we report the results from the same trial of a second vaccination at 13 weeks of age, compared to a primary vaccination. Because a relatively high proportion of study subjects (30%) were lost to follow-up in the RCT, we also conducted an analysis to control for possible selection bias over both periods (6 to 13 weeks and 13 to 20 weeks of age). We found that primary rabies vaccination at 6 weeks of age substantially increased the hazard of death from all causes over the next 7 weeks among females (hazard ratio [HR] 2.69, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.27-5.69), but not among males (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.32-2.59). Among survivors, administration of a second dose of rabies vaccine at 13 weeks of age was associated with a decreased hazard of death among males (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.10-1.02) but not females (HR 1.64, 95% CI 0.59-4.58), when compared to the group receiving their first dose at this age. Based on our causal assumptions, we show that these results were not affected by selection bias. In this high-mortality dog population, receipt of a non-live rabies vaccine substantially affected all-cause mortality rates, with this effect being strongly modified by sex.

Non-specific effects of veterinary vaccines: a systematic review.

The benefits of vaccines have been centred on their specific effects on subsequent infections by target pathogens. Recent studies, however, have opened up new insights into additional effects of vaccines known as non-specific effects (NSEs) or heterologous effects of vaccines. While several articles have reviewed epidemiological and immunological evidence for NSEs of vaccines in humans, similar works on veterinary vaccines are scarce. The objective of this paper was to review the findings of published studies on NSEs of vaccines developed or repurposed for use in animals. In total 8412 titles were retrieved from PubMed and CABI databases on the 30th of April 2021. After the final stage of screening, 45 eligible articles were included in the review. Data from these articles were summarised and presented here. In general, most of the vaccines studied in the reviewed articles have beneficial NSEs against multiple pathogens and disease conditions. There were, however, fewe studies reporting detrimental NSEs from both non-live and live vaccines which is in contrast to the currently existing evidence of beneficial NSEs of live vaccines and detrimental NSEs of non-live vaccines. This review may be used as a complement for future review of RCT studies of NSEs of vaccines in animals and provide a useful addition to the evolving understanding of the NSEs of vaccines.