Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 31(2): 221-230.e3, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31711748

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To report final 2-year outcomes with the Sentry bioconvertible inferior vena cava (IVC) filter in patients requiring temporary protection against pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective multicenter trial, the Sentry filter was implanted in 129 patients with documented deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or PE (67.5%) or who were at temporary risk of developing DVT/PE (32.6%). Patients were monitored and bioconversion status ascertained by radiography, computed tomography (CT), and CT venography through 2 years. RESULTS: The composite primary 6-month endpoint of clinical success was achieved in 97.4% (111/114) of patients. The rate of new symptomatic PE was 0% (n = 126) through 1 year and 2.4% (n = 85) through the second year of follow-up, with 2 new nonfatal cases at 581 and 624 days that were adjudicated as not related to the procedure or device. Two patients (1.6%) developed symptomatic caval thrombosis during the first month and underwent successful interventions without recurrence. No other filter-related symptomatic complications occurred through 2 years. There was no filter tilting, migration, embolization, fracture, or caval perforation and no filter-related deaths through 2 years. Filter bioconversion was successful for 95.7% (110/115) of patients at 6 months, 96.4% (106/110) of patients at 12 months, and 96.5% (82/85) of patients at 24 months. Through 24 months of follow-up, there was no evidence of late-stage IVC obstruction or thrombosis after filter bioconversion or of thrombogenicity associated with retracted filter arms. CONCLUSIONS: The Sentry IVC filter provided safe and effective protection against PE, with a high rate of intended bioconversion and a low rate of device-related complications, through 2 years of follow-up.


Assuntos
Implantação de Prótese/instrumentação , Embolia Pulmonar/prevenção & controle , Filtros de Veia Cava , Veia Cava Inferior , Trombose Venosa/prevenção & controle , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bélgica , Chile , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Flebografia , Desenho de Prótese , Implantação de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Veia Cava Inferior/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombose Venosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 29(10): 1350-1361.e4, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30177423

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess the Sentry bioconvertible inferior vena cava (IVC) filter in patients requiring temporary protection against pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: At 23 sites, 129 patients with documented deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or PE, or at temporary risk of developing DVT or PE, unable to use anticoagulation were enrolled. The primary end point was clinical success, including successful filter deployment, freedom from new symptomatic PE through 60 days before filter bioconversion, and 6-month freedom from filter-related complications. Patients were monitored by means of radiography, computerized tomography (CT), and CT venography to assess filtering configuration through 60 days, filter bioconversion, and incidence of PE and filter-related complications through 12 months. RESULTS: Clinical success was achieved in 111 of 114 evaluable patients (97.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 92.5%-99.1%). The rate of freedom from new symptomatic PE through 60 days was 100% (n = 129, 95% CI 97.1%-100.0%), and there were no cases of PE through 12 months for either therapeutic or prophylactic indications. Two patients (1.6%) developed symptomatic caval thrombosis during the first month; neither experienced recurrence after successful interventions. There was no filter tilting, migration, embolization, fracture, or caval perforation by the filter, and no filter-related death through 12 months. Filter bioconversion was successful for 95.7% (110/115) at 6 months and for 96.4% (106/110) at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The Sentry IVC filter provided safe and effective protection against PE, with a high rate of intended bioconversion and a low rate of device-related complications, through 12 months of imaging-intense follow-up.


Assuntos
Implantação de Prótese/instrumentação , Embolia Pulmonar/prevenção & controle , Embolia Pulmonar/terapia , Filtros de Veia Cava , Trombose Venosa/prevenção & controle , Trombose Venosa/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bélgica , Chile , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Flebografia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Desenho de Prótese , Implantação de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Embolia Pulmonar/etiologia , Recidiva , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Trombose Venosa/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombose Venosa/etiologia , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 17(9): 482-6, 2005 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16145238

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify a new angiographic parameter associated with poor short- and long-term outcomes with nitinol stenting in the larger infrainguinal arteries. BACKGROUND: Nitinol stents have proven to be useful and safe, but imperfect, tools for treating claudication and limb-threatening ischemia. Primary and secondary patency in superficial femoral artery (SFA) occlusions treated with nitinol stents are up to 80% at 1 year, but restenosis is between 40-50% at 2 years. The causes of SFA and popliteal restenosis remain unclear. Stent fracture has been implicated in some cases of restenosis, but this is clearly the minority. Chronic mechanical trauma to the arteries caused by native vessel-stent interaction, intensified by limb motion over time, appears to be a more plausible explanation. METHODS: Presented here are 2 cases of restenosis apparently caused by acute and chronic trauma to the native vessel from interaction of the artery with the ends of relatively rigid nitinol stent systems. RESULTS: The source of some future restenotic and occlusive events are not apparent using routine angiography techniques. CONCLUSION: The additional step of an on-table leg bend test at 80-90 degrees will allow the interventionalist to visualize many cases of negative interaction between the native artery and the stents that will occur during routine movement. This allows the operator to potentially avoid stent-induced arterial trauma.


Assuntos
Ligas , Arteriopatias Oclusivas/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Artéria Femoral , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/etiologia , Artéria Poplítea , Stents , Idoso , Angiografia Digital , Implante de Prótese Vascular/instrumentação , Feminino , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/diagnóstico , Humanos , Falha de Prótese , Fatores de Tempo , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...