Inter-tester reliability and agreement of the Cumulated Ambulation Score in acute stroke: The InTRO-CAS-stroke study.

TITLE: Inter-Tester Reliability and Agreement of the Cumulated Ambulation Score in Stroke patients: The InTRO-CAS-stroke study OBJECTIVE: To examine the inter-tester reliability of the total Cumulated Ambulation Score (CAS) and the three activities of the CAS, and to define limits for the smallest change in basic mobility that indicates a real change in patients with stroke. METHODS: An intertester reliability study. SETTING: Participants: 60 participants from a specialized stroke unit with a mean age of 69.10 ± 13.23 years. The CAS describes a patient's independency in three activities - (1) getting in and out of bed, (2) sit to stand from a chair, and (3) walking ability and was assessed by two independent physiotherapists at median day 3 poststroke. Each activity was assessed on a three-point ordinal scale from 0 (not able to) to 2 (independent). The cumulated score for each activity provides a total CAS from 0 to 6, with 6 indicating independent basic mobility. Relative and absolute reliability was evaluated using weighted kappa, the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable change (MDC). RESULTS: The weighted kappa for the total CAS score was 0.816 and ranged from 0.733 to 0.904 for the 3 CAS activities. The SEM and the MDC of the total CAS was 0.37 and 1.03 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The intertester reliability of the CAS is almost perfect, and a change of 1 CAS point for the total CAS indicates a real change in basic mobility, at group level and for an individual patient with stroke CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT05601089.

Healthcare Professionals' Experiences with Functional Independence Measure (FIM) as a Structured Framework for Interprofessional Team Meetings in Danish Stroke Rehabilitation: A Qualitative Cross-Sectoral Collaborative Study.

Purpose: An ethnographic and phenomenological mapping of the experiences of healthcare professionals with the functional independence measure (FIM) in stroke rehabilitation. Methods: This is a cross-sectoral qualitative study with triangulation of data from two focus group interviews, 15 individual interviews, and 11 participant observations of FIM assessments performed by six different healthcare professions in interprofessional teams. FIM assessments were performed at hospital and in a community rehabilitation centre as interprofessional meetings with a local facilitator certified in FIM. Results: Three overarching themes, learning space, improved interprofessional collaboration, and transferability, emerged from the data. The use of FIM within the provided structures established an environment that allowed the various healthcare professionals (HCP) to learn with, about, and from each other. This is perceived as promoting interprofessional collaboration and enhancing patient-specific knowledge within the interprofessional team. The established patient-specific knowledge is specific to the individual team and is difficult to transfer intraorganisationally and across sectors. Conclusion: FIM was a catalyst for improved interprofessional knowledge transfer and interprofessional collaboration within the individual teams, but intraorganisational and cross-sectoral dissemination of patient-specific knowledge was limited.