Should the Cytobrush be used in routine screening for cervical pathology?

In 632 women visiting a family planning clinic, paired cervical smears were taken using a wooden spatula and a Cytobrush. Of the spatula smears 7.8% were unreliable with too little or scanty material to allow a cytologic diagnosis (class 0); 17.7% of spatula smears were inadequate, lacking endocervical cells. Combined spatula/Cytobrush cytology reduced these figures significantly; 4.3% unreliable smears and 3.2% inadequate specimens. Seventy-three (11.6%) of the smears revealed some abnormality, in most cases Papanicolaou class IIIA, suggestive of mild dysplasia. In 10 cases, dysplastic cells were found only in the Cytobrush cytology. It is concluded that the Cytobrush adds to the improvement of smear quality and the accuracy of routine cervical cytology obtained by relatively inexperienced smear takers.

Performance of the Cytobrush in patients at risk for cervical pathology: does it add anything to the wooden spatula?

In 130 high-risk patients for cervical pathology paired smears were obtained with a wooden spatula and a Cytobrush. The Cytobrush was useful in lowering the amount of inadequate smears (2 vs 22%, p less than or equal to 0.01), and detected more abnormal cytology in combination with the spatula compared to the spatula smear alone (27 vs 35%, p less than or equal to 0.05). In 6 cases, adequate false-negative spatula smears, containing endocervical cells, were corrected by the Cytobrush. It is concluded that the Cytobrush is useful in lowering the amount of inadequate smears and false-negative cytology, while there is little evidence of false-positive cytology. The use of the wooden spatula/Cytobrush-combination is recommended in high risk populations.

The efficiency of the Cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells in cervical smears.

In 30 patients whose last cervical smear had lacked endocervical cells, two new samples were collected, one with a cotton-tipped applicator and the other with the recently developed Cytobrush cervical brush. With the cotton swab, no endocervical cells were present in the repeat smears of 21 patients, as compared with only 3 Cytobrush smears lacking endocervical cells; the difference is statistically significant (P less than .001). Quantitatively, the cellular yield with the Cytobrush was larger. It is concluded that the use of the cervical brush to collect material for cervical smears is more effective and provides a higher yield of cells than the use of the conventional cotton swab. The importance of the presence of endocervical cells in a smear as evidence that the transformation zone has been properly sampled is also discussed.