Two-minute standing endurance test for axial postural abnormalities in patients with Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Photo-based measurement methods are used to assess axial postural abnormalities (PA) in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, they capture only moments in time. We developed the 2-minute standing endurance test (2 M-SET), which specifically captures temporal changes in posture, as a novel dynamic method for measuring axial PA in patients with PD. RESEARCH QUESTION: This study aimed to verify the effectiveness and validity of the 2 M-SET for capturing temporal changes in axial PA in patients with PD. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with PD participated. The participants attempted to maintain an upright posture for 2 minutes during three tasks: standing, stepping in place, and walking. The rate of change in postural angle was recorded at 10-second intervals. Based on the results, the 2 M-SET was developed. Therapists evaluated the 2 M-SET using the NeuroPostureApp© to measure anterior trunk flexion (ATF) angles and lateral trunk flexion (LTF) angles at 0, 10, 30, 60, and 120 seconds. To assess reliability, the congruence between the measurements obtained by the therapists and those obtained using a three-dimensional motion-analysis system was examined. For validity, we assessed whether the ATF and LTF angles measured by the therapists could accurately capture postural changes at regular intervals over time. RESULTS: The average postural changes over 2 minutes for the standing, stepping in place, and gait tasks were 59.2±83.5%, 37.6±30.7%, and 45.4±50.6%, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficients showed high reliability, with values of 0.985 and 0.970 for the ATF and LTF angles, respectively. SIGNIFICANCE: The results of our proposed 2 M-SET method, which uses temporal photo-based measurements to assess the patient's ability to maintain an upright standing position for 2 minutes, demonstrate the potential to capture temporal changes in axial PA. DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT: The data supporting the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request and approval from the local ethics committee.

Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test and its two abbreviated versions in persons with mild to moderate spinocerebellar ataxia: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The reliability of the evaluation of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) and its two abbreviated versions are confirmed for balance characteristics and reliability. However, they are not utilized in cases of spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine the test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) of the BESTest and its abbreviated versions in persons with mild to moderate spinocerebellar ataxia. METHODS: The BESTest was performed in 20 persons with SCA at baseline and one month later. The scores of the abbreviated version of the BESTest were determined from the BESTest scores. The interclass correlation coefficient (1,1) was used as a measure of relative reliability. Furthermore, we calculated the MDC in the BESTest and its abbreviated versions. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficients (1,1) and MDC at 95% confidence intervals were 0.92, 8.7(8.1%), 0.91, 4.1(14.5%), and 0.81, 5.2(21.6%) for the Balance, Mini-Balance, and Brief-Balance Evaluation Systems Tests, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The BESTest and its abbreviated versions had high test-retest reliability. The MDC values of the BESTest could enable clinicians and researchers to interpret changes in the balance of patients with SCA more precisely.

Lung Insufflation Capacity with a New Device in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Measurement of the Lung Volume Recruitment in Respiratory Therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate the usefulness of the measurement of lung insufflation capacity (LIC) using the LIC TRAINER (LT) in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in the rehabilitation departments of the Japanese National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry and involved 20 ALS patients who underwent respiratory therapy between April 1, 2014, and December 2017. The vital capacity (VC), maximum insufflation capacity (MIC), and LIC measurements at the start of respiratory therapy were extracted from the medical records, and patients were divided into three groups: group A, VC could not be measured; group B, VC could be measured, but MIC was less than VC; and group C, MIC was larger than VC. LIC could be measured in all groups. In group C, paired t-tests were used to analyze whether there was a significant difference in the volumes measured using different methods. RESULTS: LIC was 950, 1863±595, and 2980±1176 ml in groups A (n=1), B (n=10), and C (n=9), respectively. In groups A and B, LIC could be measured in all patients, even when VC or MIC could not be measured. In group C, the measured LIC value was significantly greater than MIC (p=0.003). CONCLUSION: LIC could be successfully measured using the LT. By using the LT, it was feasible to conveniently perform LIC measurements, suggesting that it could be a useful device for performing respiratory therapy in ALS patients.