Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Food Chem ; 240: 1243-1253, 2018 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28946249

RESUMO

Clean extracts are essential in LC-MS/MS, since the matrix effect can interfere in the analysis. Alternative materials which can be used as sorbents, such as chitosan in the clean-up step, are cheap and green options. In this study, chitosan from shrimp shell waste was evaluated as a sorbent in the QuEChERS method in order to determine multi-residues of veterinary drugs in different types of milk, i. e., fatty matrices. After optimization, the method showed correlation coefficients above 0.99, LOQs ranged between 1 and 50µgkg-1 and recoveries ranged between 62 and 125%, with RSD<20% for all veterinary drugs in all types of milk under study. The clean-up step which employed chitosan proved to be effective, since it reduced both the matrix effect (from values between -40 and -10% to values from -10 to +10%) and the extract turbidity (up to 95%). When the proposed method was applied to different milk samples, residues of albendazole (49µgkg-1), sulfamethazine (

Assuntos
Decápodes/química , Animais , Quitosana , Cromatografia Líquida , Leite , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem , Drogas Veterinárias
2.
Food Chem ; 242: 475-480, 2018 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29037717

RESUMO

Booster biocides have been widely applied to ships and other submerged structures. These compounds can be released into the marine environment as the result of vessel hull leaching and may remain in different environmental compartments. This study aimed at introducing an environmentally friendly procedure for the extraction of irgarol and diuron from fish samples by vortex-assisted matrix solid phase dispersion (VA-MSPD) with detection by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Different types of solid supports and solvents were evaluated. The best results were found when 0.5g mussel shell, 0.5g sodium sulfate and 5mL ethanol were used. Analytical recoveries ranged from 81 to 110%, with RSD below 10%, whereas the matrix effect was between -17 and 1% (for all samples under study). LOQ values of irgarol and diuron were 5 and 50ngg-1, respectively. The method under investigation proved to be a promising alternative to controlling contamination of fish by booster biocides, with low consumption of biodegradable reagents.


Assuntos
Desinfetantes/análise , Desinfetantes/isolamento & purificação , Alimentos Marinhos/análise , Extração em Fase Sólida/métodos , Animais , Bivalves/química , Cromatografia Líquida , Peixes , Contaminação de Alimentos/análise , Extração em Fase Sólida/instrumentação , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem
3.
Talanta ; 146: 676-88, 2016 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26695317

RESUMO

A rapid and efficient sample pretreatment using solvent-based de-emulsification dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (SD-DLLME) coupled with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was studied for the extraction of 58 pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) and pesticides from water samples. Type and volume of extraction and disperser solvents, pH, salt addition, amount of salt and type of demulsification solvent were evaluated. Limits of quantification (LOQ) in the range from 0.0125 to 1.25 µg L(-1) were reached, and linearity was in the range from the LOQ of each compound to 25 µg L(-1). Recoveries ranged from 60% to 120% for 84% of the compounds, with relative standard deviations lower than 29%. The proposed method demonstrated, for the first time, that sample preparation by SD-DLLME with determination by LC-MS/MS can be successfully used for the simultaneous extraction of 32 pesticides and 26 PPCPs from water samples. The entire procedure, including the extraction of 58 organic compounds from the aqueous sample solution and the breaking up of the emulsion after extraction with water, rather than with an organic solvent, was environmentally friendly. In addition, this technique was less expensive and faster than traditional techniques. Finally, the analytical method under study was successfully applied to the analysis of all 58 pesticides and PPCPs in surface water samples.


Assuntos
Cromatografia Líquida/métodos , Cosméticos/análise , Microextração em Fase Líquida/métodos , Praguicidas/análise , Preparações Farmacêuticas/análise , Solventes/química , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem/métodos , Cosméticos/isolamento & purificação , Emulsões , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Praguicidas/isolamento & purificação , Preparações Farmacêuticas/isolamento & purificação , Sais/química , Água/química , Poluentes Químicos da Água/análise , Poluentes Químicos da Água/isolamento & purificação
4.
J Chromatogr A ; 1360: 66-75, 2014 Sep 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25115454

RESUMO

The clean-up step is essential to reduce interferences, improve quantification and help to maintain the integrity of the chromatographic system when working with complex matrices. In this study, alternative materials were evaluated as sorbents in the dispersive solid-phase extraction (D-SPE) for the determination and extraction of seventeen pesticides from rice paddy soil samples by the quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe (QuEChERS) method coupled with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Chitin, chitosan, diatomaceous earth and PSA were compared in terms of extraction efficiency and matrix effect. The best results were achieved when chitosan was used. Quantification limits ranged from 0.1 to 100µgkg(-1). Calibration curves showed correlation coefficient values higher than 0.98. Results of accuracy and precision in the spiked soil samples between 60% and 120%, with a relative standard deviation lower than 20%, were reached for 15 out of 17 pesticides. The matrix effect was evaluated and only one compound was influenced by the matrix components, showing medium effect. Results showed that alternative materials are more effective and less expensive than traditional sorbents which have been usually employed, i.e., they may be used in the D-SPE step during the extraction of pesticides from rice paddy soils.


Assuntos
Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão/métodos , Oryza , Praguicidas/análise , Solo/química , Extração em Fase Sólida/métodos , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem/métodos , Calibragem , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão/economia , Extração em Fase Sólida/economia , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem/economia , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA