Overcoming barriers to oral contraception in Italy an expert opinion to empower women.

Oral contraceptives are among the most commonly used contraceptive methods. However, Italian women underused reliable hormonal contraceptives as compared with other European women. There is a need to streamline access to oral contraception, with expected benefits on emotional well-being of women and potential savings for health system in Italy. Indeed, women can only access to oral contraceptives through mandatory medical prescription. This is one of the most important barrier experienced by women. We hereby provide an expert opinion on the potential reclassification, extending pharmacy services to include responsible and appropriate use of POP, as an opportunity also in Italy to increase the use of safe and effective contraceptive methods.

Attitudes of women and pharmacists on the opportunity to obtain a progestogen-only pill over the counter - Italian outcomes.

PURPOSE: Scrutinizing, among potential providers and users, the perceived claim and interest for over the counter (OTC) accessibility of a progestogen-only pill (POP). METHODS: Cross-sectional, descriptive study based on an online survey of 1000 women and 100 pharmacists in Italy, part of a larger sample including Germany and Spain. RESULTS: Hormonal contraceptive methods are used by 35%; 5% of women reported currently not using contraception, 40% using a barrier method, and 20% a method considered less effective than male condoms (including 16% withdrawal and 4% natural methods and fertility/contraceptive applications). Almost 80% of women felt knowledgeable about the different contraceptive method, but about 1/3 had experienced difficulty accessing their oral contraceptive (OC) in the past two years. Women reacted positively to the proposition of an OTC-POP and 85% agreed that they would discuss the decision to buy it with their doctor; 75% reported they would continue to see their doctor for other reproductive health issues, including screening. The most frequent barrier is cost (reported by 25-33% of women) followed by long waiting times for doctor appointments and lack of personal time to schedule an appointment.Pharmacists (66%) would be likely/fairly likely to recommend the POP after appropriate training, agreeing that the benefits of an OTC-POP included improved access for women, saving them time and giving them more independence. CONCLUSIONS: Potential users of contraception in Italy have a positive attitude toward OTC-POP, with doctors continuing to have a relevant role. Following training, pharmacists are also positive.

The views of women and pharmacists on the desirability of a progestogen-only pill over the counter. Results of a survey in Germany, Italy and Spain.

PURPOSE: To explore the perceived need and enthusiasm for over the counter (OTC) progestogen-only pills (POP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web-based survey of 1000 sexually active women (16-45) and 100 pharmacists in Germany, Italy and Spain. RESULTS: Despite not wanting to conceive, 5-6% of women in each country were not using contraception and 8-20% were using methods less effective than condoms. At least 74% of respondents felt knowledgeable about the different contraceptives available but at least 1/3 had experienced difficulty accessing oral contraceptive (OCs) in the past two years. The cost of contraceptives, the need to see a doctor and long waits for appointments were cited as barriers for not using OCs. The majority agreed they would discuss with their doctor the decision to buy the POP, consult about side effects and other reproductive health issues. Over 2/3 of pharmacists in each country would be very, or fairly, likely to recommend the POP, agreeing that the benefits included improved access for women, and offered them more independence. CONCLUSIONS: Asked directly, women in Germany, Spain and Italy currently using contraception are positive about a POP OTC. Pharmacists are also positive, with the overwhelming majority in favour of providing POPs.

Multicenter phase 2 study of combined gemcitabine and epirubicin as second-line treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this phase 2 trial was to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of combined gemcitabine (G) and epirubicin (E) as second-line treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS: Treatment with G 1000 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8) and E 60 mg/m2 (day 1) every 3 weeks for 3 or, in the absence of progression, 6 courses. RESULTS: Fifty patients with advanced ovarian cancer (31 serous, 2 endometrioid, 10 unclassified adenocarcinoma, and 7 other) and a median age of 60 years (range, 38-74 years) were enrolled after giving their informed consent. Performance status according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group was 0 in 29 patients (58%), 1 in 17 patients (34%), and 2 in 4 patients (8%), and the initial stages according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics were I to II in 4 patients (8%), III in 31 patients (62%), and IV in 15 patients (30%). They had previously received a median of 1.5 lines of treatment (range, 1-4). The median platinum-free interval was 5 months (range, 0-12 months): 32 patients had relapse within 6 months and 18 patients had relapse after 6 months. The response rate was 42% (2% complete response and 40% partial response), with a median duration of 7.2 months: the corresponding figures were 37.5% and 5.2 months in the platinum-resistant patients and 50% and 8.8 months in the platinum-sensitive patients. The main grade 3 to 4 hematological toxicity was neutropenia (56% of cases). After a median follow-up of 13.5 months, median progression-free survival was 5 months, and median overall survival was 23.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: This E + G combination seems to be active and safe in platinum-resistant/refractory patients.

A phase II study of liposomal doxorubicin in recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of liposomal formulation of doxorubicin in recurrent ovarian carcinoma patients. METHODS: Thirty patients were included in the study after having obtained an informed consent. Their main characteristics were: median age, 64 years (range, 45-80), ECOG performance status 0 in 17 patients (56%), 1 in 11 patients (36%) and 2 in 2 patients (6.6%). Eighteen patients had metastatic disease and 12 locally advanced disease. All patients were pretreated with a platinum-based chemotherapy: 3 were considered refractory to platinum (progression or stable disease), 2 were platinum resistant (relapse < 12 months), and 7 were platinum sensitive (relapse > or = 12 months). Treatment consisted of liposomal doxorubicin, 50 mg/m2 every 4 weeks. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 26.6%, with 2 complete responses and 6 partial responses lasting 3.5 months. The incidence of grade 3-4 toxicity was 23.3% for neutropenia, 10% for mucositis and 10% for plantar-palmar erythrodysesthesia. Median survival was 12+ months (range, 2-26+). CONCLUSIONS: Liposomal doxorubicin appears to be a moderately active drug in pretreated patients, and its activity seems to be similar to that reported for other active regimens in terms of response rate. The toxicological profile of liposomal doxorubicin suggests that it may be combined with other drugs in the treatment of patients with ovarian cancer.