Post-marketing surveillance (PMS) of all patients treated with irinotecan in Japan: clinical experience and ADR profile of 13,935 patients.

OBJECTIVE: The actual condition of drug utilization and the adverse drug reactions profile of irinotecan hydrochloride hydrate (irinotecan), an antitumor drug, were examined on the basis of all the case survey results from April 1995 to January 2000. METHODS: Drug utilization and the adverse drug reactions profile of irinotecan were figured out by checking of the patient conditions at the start of therapy and monitoring during on-therapy period in this survey. RESULTS: Among the 13 935 patients investigated, 32% had non-small cell lung cancer, 16% had colorectal cancer, 15% had ovarian cancer and 14% had small cell lung cancer, all principal cancers in which irinotecan was domestically approved for use. Most frequent regimens of each cancer were concomitant use with cisplatin for non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer (38 and 46%, respectively), concomitant use with cisplatin or mitomycin for ovarian cancer (each 30%) and irinotecan alone for colorectal cancer (51%). The major (grade 3 or more) adverse drug reactions were myelosuppressions such as leukopenia (23.8 and 38.3% for lone and concomitant use, respectively) thrombocytopenia (6.5 and 14.3%) and gastrointestinal tract disorders such as diarrhea (10.2 and 10.0%). CONCLUSIONS: It was reconfirmed that the incidences of serious leukopenia, thrombocytopenia and diarrhea were high among the patients with contraindication or careful administration of its use prescribed in the drug package insert. Therefore, for proper use of irinotecan, it is important to discriminate the patient on the basis of risk status.

A multi-institution phase I/II trial of triweekly regimen with S-1 plus cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: To determine the dose-limiting toxicity and recommended dose (RD) of cisplatin (CDDP) combined with S-1 (tegafur, 5-chloro-2, 4-dihydroxypyridine, and potassium oxonate) for patients with non-small cell lung cancer and to evaluate efficacy and toxicity of this regimen at RD. METHODS: Patients with stages III and IV non-small cell lung cancer received 3-week cycles of treatment, each consisting of oral administration of S-1 at 80 mg/m in 2 divided doses per day for 14 consecutive days, intravenous administration of CDDP (60 mg/m, 70 mg/m, or 80 mg/m) on the first day, and no medication during the subsequent 7 days. The primary objective of phase I study was to estimate the maximum tolerable dose and the RD, and the primary end point of phase II study was response. RESULTS: RD of CDDP in the analysis of 18 eligible patients was 60 mg/m. Evaluation of efficacy and toxicity at RD in 55 eligible patients showed that partial response was observed in 18 patients (32.7%, 95% confidence interval: 20.7-46.7%). The median survival time was 18.1 months, and the time to disease progression was 3.8 months. Grade 3 or severer adverse events were observed in 27 patients (49.1%). CONCLUSIONS: CDDP combined with S-1 showed a satisfactory overall survival time and acceptable toxicity profile. However, the response as the primary end point did not reach the predetermined threshold level.

Phase I study of YM155, a novel survivin suppressant, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: YM155, a novel molecular targeted agent, suppresses survivin, a member of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein family that is overexpressed in many tumor types. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of YM155 in patients with advanced refractory solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with advanced refractory solid tumors were treated with escalating doses of YM155 administered by continuous i.v. infusion for 168 hours in 21-day cycles. RESULTS: Of the 34 patients enrolled, 33 (median age, 59 years) received at least 1 dose of YM155 (range, 1-19 cycles). The dose levels studied were 1.8, 3.6, 4.8, 6.0, 8.0, and 10.6 mg/m(2)/d. The MTD was determined to be 8.0 mg/m(2)/d, based on a dose-limiting toxicity of increased blood creatinine observed in 2 patients receiving 10.6 mg/m(2)/d. The most common adverse reactions judged to be related to YM155 were urine microalbumin present; fever; injection-site phlebitis; fatigue; and decreased hemoglobin/anemia, blood albumin, and lymphocyte count. The pharmacokinetic profile was almost linear over the dosing range and was similar between cycles 1 and 2. Urinary excretion of YM155 showed no definite difference among doses. Stable disease was achieved in nine patients. CONCLUSIONS: YM155 was safely administered to patients with advanced refractory solid tumors by 168-hour continuous i.v. infusion in 21-day cycles. The MTD was determined to be 8.0 mg/m(2)/d. The safety profile, plasma concentrations achieved, and antitumor activity observed merit further studies with this survivin suppressant, alone and in combination regimens.

Randomized phase II trial of three intrapleural therapy regimens for the management of malignant pleural effusion in previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer: JCOG 9515.

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of three intrapleural therapy regimens consisting of bleomycin (BLM), OK-432 (a pulverized product of heat-killed Streptococcus pyogenes) or cisplatin plus etoposide (PE) for the management of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) in previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer. Eligible patients were randomized to the BLM arm: BLM 1mg/kg (maximum 60mg/body), the OK-432 arm: OK-432 0.2 Klinische Einheit units (KE)/kg (maximum 10KE/body), or the PE arm: cisplatin (80mg/m(2)) and etoposide (80mg/m(2)). Pleural response was evaluated every 4 weeks according to the study-specific criteria. All responders received systemic chemotherapy consisting of PE every 3-4 weeks for two or more courses. Pleural progression-free survival (PPFS) was defined as the time from randomization to the first observation of pleural progression or death due to any cause. The primary endpoint was the 4-week PPFS rate. Of 105 patients enrolled, 102 were assessed for response. The 4-week PPFS rate for the BLM arm was 68.6%, 75.8% for the OK-432 arm, and 70.6% for PE arm. Median survival time (MST) for the BLM arm was 32.1 weeks, 48.1 weeks for the OK-432 arm, and 45.7 weeks for the PE arm. However, the outcomes did not differ significantly between groups. Toxicity was tolerable in all arms except for one treatment-related death due to interstitial pneumonia induced by BLM. We will select intrapleural treatment using OK-432 in the management of MPE in NSCLC for further investigation because it had the highest 4-week PPFS rate.

Phase I/II trial of sequential chemoradiotherapy using a novel hypoxic cell radiosensitizer, doranidazole (PR-350), in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung Cancer (WJTOG-0002).

PURPOSE: This Phase I/II trial was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of PR-350, a novel hypoxic cell radiosensitizer, when administered with thoracic radiation therapy (RT) after induction chemotherapy (CT) for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two cycles of cisplatin (80 mg/m(2)) and paclitaxel (180 mg/m(2)), or carboplatin (AUC = 6) and paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) were given before RT of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. In the Phase I portion, the starting dosage of PR-350 was 10 daily administrations (2000 mg/m(2)) in combination with RT, and this number was increased in increments of 10 for successive groups to 30 doses. RESULTS: In total, 37 patients were enrolled. In Phase I (n = 20), PR-350 could be administered 30 times with concurrent thoracic RT. Thus, in Phase II (n = 17), PR-350 was administered 30 times. The major toxicity was radiation pneumonitis, with Grade 3 or more pneumonitis noted in 6 patients (16%) including 2 with treatment-related deaths. However, no Grade 3 or more esophageal toxicity was noted, and only Grade 1 peripheral neuropathy was noted in 9 patients (24%). For all 37 patients, the median survival time (MST) and the 2-year survival rate were 15.9 months and 24%, respectively. For 18 patients receiving 21 to 30 doses of PR-350, the MST and 2-year survival rate were 20.9 months and 33%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic RT combined with 30 daily administrations of PR-350 after induction CT was well tolerated and promising for locally advanced NSCLC.

Phase II study of amrubicin in previously untreated patients with extensive-disease small cell lung cancer: West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group (WJTOG) study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of amrubicin, (+)-(7S, 9S)-9-acetyl-9-amino-7-[(2-deoxy-beta-D-erythro-pentopyranosyl )oxy]-7,8,9,10-tetrahydro-6,11-dihydroxy-5,12-naphthacenedione hydrochloride, in previously untreated patients with extensive-disease small cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 35 previously untreated patients with extensive-disease SCLC were entered into the study. Amrubicin was given by daily intravenous infusion at 45 mg/m(2)/day for 3 consecutive days, every 3 weeks. Unless there was tumor regression of 25% or greater after the first cycle, or 50% or greater after the second cycle, treatment was switched to salvage chemotherapy in combination with etoposide (100 mg/m(2), days 1, 2, and 3) and cisplatin (80 mg/m(2), day 1). RESULTS: Of the 35 patients entered, 33 were eligible and assessable for efficacy and toxicity. Of the 33 patients, 3 (9.1%) had a complete response (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-24.3%) and 22 had a partial response, for an overall response rate of 75.8% (95% CI, 57.7-88.9%). Median survival time was 11.7 months (95% CI, 9.9-15.3 months), and 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 48.5% and 20.2%, respectively. The most common toxicity was hematologic. Non-hematologic toxicity of grade 3 or 4 was only seen in 3 patients with anorexia (9.1%) and 1 patient with alopecia (3.0%). Salvage chemotherapy was administered to only 6 patients. CONCLUSION: Amrubicin was active for extensive-disease SCLC with acceptable toxicity. Further studies in combination with other agents for SCLC are warranted.

Predictive factors for interstitial lung disease, antitumor response, and survival in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib.

PURPOSE: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a serious adverse effect of gefitinib, but its prevalence and risk factors remain largely unknown. We examined the prevalence of and risk factors for gefitinib-induced ILD associated with practical use of the drug in Japanese with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical information was retrospectively assembled for NSCLC patients who started gefitinib treatment at affiliated institutions of the West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group between August 31 and December 31, 2002. Medical records of patients who developed pulmonary infiltrates were reviewed by a central committee of extramural experts for identification of patients with gefitinib-induced ILD. Multivariate logistic or Cox regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictive factors for ILD, antitumor response, and survival. RESULTS: Seventy cases of and 31 deaths from gefitinib-induced ILD were identified among 1,976 consecutively treated patients at 84 institutions, corresponding to a prevalence of 3.5% and mortality of 1.6%. Gefitinib-induced ILD was significantly associated with male sex, a history of smoking, and coincidence of interstitial pneumonia (odds ratios = 3.10, 4.79, and 2.89, respectively). Predictive factors for response were female sex, no history of smoking, adenocarcinoma histology, metastatic disease, and good performance status (PS), whereas predictive factors for survival were female sex, no history of smoking, adenocarcinoma histology, nonmetastatic disease, good PS, and previous chest surgery. CONCLUSION: ILD is a serious adverse effect of gefitinib in the clinical setting that cannot be ignored. However, patient selection based on sex and smoking history can minimize ILD risk and maximize the clinical benefit of gefitinib.

Multicenter phase II study of amrubicin, 9-amino-anthracycline, in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (Study 1): West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group (WJTOG) trial.

PURPOSE: Amrubicin is a novel 9-aminoanthracycline. This multicenter phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of amrubicin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-one previously untreated patients with stage III or IV NSCLC were entered this study. The patients were required to have cytologically or histologically proven measurable NSCLC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2, and adequate organ function. Amrubicin was administered by daily intravenous injection at 45 mg/m2/day for 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks. At least 3 cycles of treatment were administered to each patient. RESULTS: All 61 patients registered in this trial were eligible and assessable for efficacy and toxicity. Of them, 17 patients achieved objective responses, consisting of one complete response and 16 partial responses, and the overall response rate was 27.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.1% to 40.8%). The median survival time was 9.8 months (95% CI, 7.7 months to 14.9 months). The major toxicity was myelosuppression. The incidences of grade 3 or 4 toxicity were 72.1% for neutropenia, 52.5% for leukopenia, 23.0% for anemia, and 14.8% for thrombocytopenia. As noticeable toxic events, grade 3 hypotention and alkaline phosphatase elevation were transiently observed in one patient each. In addition, three patients who had had asymptomatic interstitial pneumonitis, identified by diagnostic imaging before treatment, aggravated after amrubicin treatment; two of them died. Other non-hematologic toxicities were relatively mild. CONCLUSION: Amrubicin was an active, well-tolerated agent in the treatment of NSCLC.

Phase I/II study of amrubicin, a novel 9-aminoanthracycline, in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Amrubicin is a novel, totally synthetic 9-aminoanthracycline. The present phase I/II study was performed to define its maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), efficacy and toxicity in the treatment of previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemonaive patients were required to have cytologically or histologically proven measurable NSCLC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 to 2, and adequate organ functions. Amrubicin was administered by daily intravenous injection for 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks. RESULTS: In a phase I study, four patients were enrolled at dose level 1 (40 mg/m(2)/day) and four at dose level 2 (45 mg/m(2)/day). No dose limiting toxicity (DLT), which was defined as toxicity consisting of grade 4 neutropenia and leukopenia lasting four days or more, and grade 3 or 4 toxicity other than neutropenia, leukopenia, anorexia, nausea/vomiting, and alopecia, was observed at these dose levels. Subsequently, at dose level 3 (50 mg/m(2)/day), 3 of 5 patients experienced DLTs (leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, or gastrointestinal complications). The MTD and recommended dose (RD) were determined to be 50 mg/m(2)/day and 45 mg/m(2)/day, respectively. Three partial responses (PRs) were achieved in 13 patients (response rate, 23.1%) in a phase I study. In a phase II study, 15 patients were assessable for efficacy and toxicity at the RD, and four PRs were obtained (response rate, 26.7%). The major toxicities were leukopenia and neutropenia, while non-hematologic toxicities were mild. The overall response rate in the combined patient population of the phase I/II study was 25.0% (7 PRs in 28 patients), with a 95% confidence interval of 10.7% to 44.9%. CONCLUSION: Amrubicin exerted promising antitumor activity on NSCLC with acceptable toxicity.

[An early phase II clinical study of YM 294 (rhlL-11) in patients with solid tumors and malignant lymphoma].

An early phase II study was conducted to examine the efficacy and safety of YM 294 on chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with solid tumors and malignant lymphoma. The response rates which were judged as having good or excellent efficacy by the investigators were 66.7% in all groups with 25 microg/kg or more, and the increase in nadir platelet counts and decrease in platelet transfusions were observed. Adverse reactions were fever, edema, abnormal electrocardiogram and weight gain. All adverse reactions as well as abnormal changes in laboratory values for which the casual relationship with the study drug could not be excluded were resolved and proved to be not serious. The results of this study suggest the efficacy of YM 294 at 25 microg/kg or more for chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with solid tumors and malignant lymphoma. It was considered that a study should be performed to assess the efficacy and safety of YM 294 using a dose of 25 microg/kg or more in the future.

Combination chemotherapy of gemcitabine and vinorelbine for patients in stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of the West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group (WJTOG) 9908.

OBJECTIVES: Vinorelbine (V) and gemcitabine (G) are two active single agents used in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A multicenter clinical trial (West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group (WJTOG) 9908) was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of V and G in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: no previous chemotherapy; performance status (PS) 0 or 1; age <75 years old. V, 25mg/m2, was given as a 2-3 min IV infusion, followed by a 30 min IV infusion of G, 1000 mg/m2, on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle. RESULTS: From April 2000 to September 2000, 52 pts were enrolled in the study. Two pts were ineligible. Baseline characteristics: median age 60, males 30 (60%), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS 0/1=21/29 (58%), stage IIIB/IV=12/38 (76%), adenocarcinoma=35 (70%). The median number of cycles administered was 2. Fifty pts were evaluable for response. The response rate was 18% by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) (no complete response (CR), 9 partial response (PR), 25 stable disease, 12 progressive disease, 4 not evaluable). Grade III/IV toxicities were as follows: neutropenia grade III/IV=66%, anemia grade III/IV=16%, thrombocytopenia grade III/IV=2%, nausea grade III/IV=10%, vomiting grade III/IV=0%, documented infection grade III/IV=10%, skin rash grade III/IV=2%, and hepatic grade III/IV=8%. There were no treatment-related deaths. The median time to progression was 4.1 months. The overall median survival time (MST) was 13.9 months (range, 2.4 to >16.2 months) with a median follow-up time of 13.9 months. The MST for stage IIIB and stage IV was >14.5 and 12.7 months, respectively. The overall estimated 1-year survival rate was 55.4%. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen has modest activity and is very well tolerated, with an encouraging 1-year survival rate.

[Clinical practice guideline on radiation therapy for lung cancer].

Clinical practice guidelines for radiation therapy in the treatment of lung cancer were prepared by an expert multidisciplinary Panel. This project was supported by a Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan, with the primary objective to develop efficient practice guidelines for the treatment of lung cancer by systematic review of currently available evidence. We reviewed pertinent evidence from the published literature with a computerized search on MEDLINE, and filled in abstract forms for the most relevant. All abstract forms were reviewed by other experts in the panel. The extracted problems were as follows: the basics for radiotherapy including machines, planning equipments and quality assurance, definitive radiotherapy for medically inoperable or unresectable non-small cell lung cancer, chemoradiotherapy for non-small or small cell lung cancer, prophylactic cranial irradiation, and palliative irradiation for bone and brain metastases. Values for levels of evidence and grades of recommendation for each problem were discussed and approved by the panel. Essentially, the guidelines propose the minimum requirements for clinical practice. These guidelines, therefore, are expected to be useful for individualized treatments for lung cancer patients.