BODIPY-cholesterol can be reliably used to monitor cholesterol efflux from capacitating mammalian spermatozoa.

Capacitation is the final maturation step spermatozoa undergo prior to fertilisation. The efflux of cholesterol from the sperm membrane to the extracellular environment is a crucial step during capacitation but current methods to quantify this process are suboptimal. In this study, we validate the use of a BODIPY-cholesterol assay to quantify cholesterol efflux from spermatozoa during in vitro capacitation, using the boar as a model species. The novel flow cytometric BODIPY-cholesterol assay was validated with endogenous cholesterol loss as measured by mass spectrometry and compared to filipin labelling. Following exposure to a range of conditions, the BODIPY-cholesterol assay was able to detect and quantify cholesterol efflux akin to that measured with mass spectrometry. The ability to counterstain for viability is a unique feature of this assay that allowed us to highlight the importance of isolating viable cells only for a reliable measure of cholesterol efflux. Finally, the BODIPY-cholesterol assay proved to be the superior method to quantify cholesterol efflux relative to filipin labelling, though filipin remains useful for assessing cholesterol redistribution. Taken together, the BODIPY-cholesterol assay is a simple, inexpensive and reliable flow cytometric method for the measurement of cholesterol efflux from spermatozoa during in vitro capacitation.

Extracellular vesicles in synovial fluid from juvenile horses: No age-related changes in the quantitative profile.

Extracellular vesicle (EV) concentration, characteristics and function in equine synovial fluid (SF) during normal growth and development has not previously been studied. Isolation of EVs was performed in SF from three healthy foals and two adult horses by differential ultracentrifugation (10,000g and 200,000g); EVs were purified by sucrose density gradient floatation and analysed by high-resolution flow cytometry (FCM), buoyant density and western blotting. Additionally, repeated biomarker analysis of sulphated glycosaminoglycans (GAG), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP), C-terminal crosslinked telopeptide type II collagen (CTX-II), collagenase cleaved neopeptide type II collagen (C2C) was performed in SF from 10 foals and six adult horses. In contrast with the quantitative EV profile, the biomarker profile in SF from juvenile joints was substantially different from that in SF from adult animals. However, there were qualitative differences in the high-resolution FCM scatter plots. Future in-depth functional analyses may reveal differences between juvenile and mature EVs in SF.

Flow cytometric analysis of extracellular vesicle subsets in plasma: impact of swarm by particles of non-interest.

Essentials Extracellular vesicles (EVs) in biological fluids are promising biomarkers for disease. Fluorescence-based flow cytometric analysis is suitable to detect low abundant EV subsets. Particles of non-interest can induce false-positive light scatter and fluorescent signals. Interference of particles of non-interest can be monitored by analyzing serial dilutions. SUMMARY: Background Extracellular vesicles (EVs) in plasma are increasingly being recognized as potential biomarkers. EV analysis for diagnostic purposes should be robust and should allow analysis of EV subsets with a wide range of abundance and in a large number of patient samples. Flow cytometry offers possibilities to meet these criteria, as it allows multiparameter analysis of individual EVs. However, analysis of plasma EVs is challenging, because of their size and heterogeneity, and the presence of other submicrometer-sized particles in plasma that could interfere with EV analysis. Objectives To explore whether fluorescence-based flow cytometric analysis of EV subsets is suitable when the EVs of interest are present in low abundance in a background of non-labeled or differently labeled EVs and particles. Methods Fluorescently labeled EVs of interest were spiked at different ratios in full plasma, purified plasma components, or (non-)fluorescent polystyrene beads, and subsequently analyzed by flow cytometry with fluorescence threshold triggering. Results We found that light scatter detection of low-abundance or rare EV subsets during fluorescence threshold triggering was severely affected by particles of non-interest, owing to coincidence and swarming. Importantly, we show that interfering particles labeled with different fluorophores induced false-positive fluorescent signals on the particles of interest. These unwanted effects could only be discerned and controlled by performing serial dilutions and analyzing light scatter and fluorescence parameters. Conclusions We demonstrate how particles of non-interest in plasma can impact on the light scatter and fluorescence detection of low-abundance EVs of interest during fluorescence-based flow cytometric analysis, and provide a means to prevent erroneous data interpretation.

Comparative chromosome painting between the domestic pig (Sus scrofa) and two species of peccary, the collared peccary (Tayassu tajacu) and the white-lipped peccary (T. pecari): a phylogenetic perspective.

The Suidae and the Dicotylidae (or Tayassuidae) are related mammalian families, both belonging to the artiodactyl suborder Suiformes, which diverged more than 37 million years ago. Cross-species chromosome painting was performed between the domestic pig (Sus scrofa; 2n = 38), a representative of the Suidae, and two species of the Dicotylidae: the collared peccary (Tayassu tajacu; 2n = 30) and the white-lipped peccary (T. pecari; 2n = 26). G-banded metaphase chromosomes of the two peccaries were hybridized with whole chromosome painting probes derived from domestic pig chromosomes 1-18 and X. For both peccary species, a total of 31 autosomal segments that are conserved between pig and peccary could be identified. The painting results confirm conclusions inferred from G-band analyses that the karyotypes of the collared peccary and the white-lipped peccary are largely different. The karyotypic heterogeneity of the Dicotylidae contrasts with the relative homogeneity among the karyotypes of the Suidae. For this difference between the Dicotylidae and the Suidae, a number of explanations are being postulated: 1) the extant peccaries are phylogenetically less closely related than is usually assumed; 2) the peccary genome is less stable than the genome of the pigs; and 3) special (e.g. biogeographical or biosocial) circumstances have facilitated the fixation of chromosome rearrangements in ancestral dicotylid populations.