Immune-related adverse events with immune checkpoint blockade: a comprehensive review.

Cancer immunotherapy is coming of age; it has prompted a paradigm shift in oncology, in which therapeutic agents are used to target immune cells rather than cancer cells. The first generation of new immunotherapies corresponds to antagonistic antibodies that block specific immune checkpoint molecules cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1. Targeting these checkpoints in patients living with cancer had led to long-lasting tumour responses. By unbalancing the immune system, these new immunotherapies also generate dysimmune toxicities, called immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) that mainly involve the gut, skin, endocrine glands, liver, and lung but can potentially affect any tissue. In view of their undisputed clinical efficacy, anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies are entering in the routine oncological practice, and the number of patients exposed to these drugs will increase dramatically in the near future. Although steroids can be used to treat these IRAEs, the associated immunosuppression may compromise the antitumour response. Oncologists must be ready to detect and manage these new types of adverse events. This review focuses on the mechanisms of IRAE generation, putative relationship between dysimmune toxicity and antitumour efficacy, as a basis for management guidelines.

Phase I dose-escalating study of ES-285 given as a three-hour intravenous infusion every three weeks in patients with advanced malignant solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: ES-285 (spisulosine) is a novel compound derived from the marine mollusk Spisula polynoma with evidence of preclinical antitumor activity. This phase I clinical trial was designed to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose for phase II trials (RD), as well as to evaluate the safety profile, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy data of ES-285 in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients at two medical institutions were treated with a 3-h ES-285 intravenous infusion every 3 weeks. Nine dose levels were evaluated. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed during dose escalation from 4 to 128 mg/m(2). Six patients had seven DLTs at the three highest dose levels tested: 256 mg/m(2) (n = 2), 200 mg/m(2) (n = 3) and 160 mg/m(2) (n = 1). Grade 3/4 transaminase increases (n = 3), grade 3/4 central nervous system disorders [confusion (n = 2) and ataxia (n = 1)], and grade 3 pyrexia (n = 1) were the dose-limiting toxicities found with this ES-285 administration schedule. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed ES-285 dose linearity, wide distribution and a long half-life. One non-confirmed partial response was observed in a patient with metastatic melanoma treated with ES-285 128 mg/m(2), and 18 patients showed stable disease at different dose levels, lasting longer than 3 months in six patients. CONCLUSION: Dose level VIII (200 mg/m(2)) was considered the MTD, and dose level IX (160 mg/m(2)) was defined as the RD. Limited antitumor activity was observed.

Phase I safety, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic trial of BMS-599626 (AC480), an oral pan-HER receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: We studied the safety, tolerability, and recommended dose of BMS-599626, an orally bioavailable inhibitor of the human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) family of receptor tyrosine kinases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors that expressed epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and/or HER-2 were recruited and enrolled in a phase I, open-label, dose escalation trial of oral BMS-599626 starting at 100 mg/day given once daily for at least 28 days. RESULTS: Forty-five patients received BMS-599626 (100-660 mg/day). Dose-limiting toxic effects were reported at 660 mg/day (grade 3 elevation of hepatic transaminases [two patients] and QTc interval prolongation [one patient]), therefore the recommended maximum tolerated dose was 600 mg/day. The most frequent drug-related toxic effects were diarrhea (30% of patients), anorexia (13%), asthenia (30%), and cutaneous toxic effects, including skin rash (30%). Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated C(max) and exposure to BMS-599626 in patients increased with dose. Eleven patients had stable disease and received BMS-599626 for ≥ 4 months. Serial skin and tumor biopsies taken before and after treatment revealed expected changes in pharmacodynamic biomarkers, indicating that the EGFR and HER-2 pathways were affected. Positron emission tomography imaging showed a metabolic response in 2 of 10 patients evaluated. CONCLUSION: BMS-599626 was generally well tolerated, with disease stabilization across a range of tumor types and doses.

Sequential research-related biopsies in phase I trials: acceptance, feasibility and safety.

BACKGROUND: Sequential tumour biopsies are of potential interest for the rational development of molecular targeted therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 2004 to July 2009, 186 patients participated in 14 phase I clinical trials in which sequential tumour biopsies (13 trials) and/or sequential normal skin biopsies (6 trials) were optional. All patients had to sign an independent informed consent for the biopsies. RESULTS: Tumour biopsies were proposed to 155 patients and 130 (84%) signed the consent while normal skin biopsies were proposed to 70 patients and 57 (81%) signed the consent. Tumour biopsies could not be carried out in 41 (31%) of the 130 consenting patients. Tumour biopsies were collected at baseline in 33 patients, at baseline and under treatment in 56 patients. Tumour biopsies were obtained using an 18-gauge needle, under ultrasound or computed tomography guidance. Only nine minor complications were recorded. Most tumour biopsy samples collected were intended for ancillary molecular studies including protein or gene expression analysis, comparative genomic hybridization array or DNA sequencing. According to the results available, 70% of the biopsy samples met the quality criteria of each study and were suitable for ancillary studies. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, the majority of the patients accepted skin biopsies as well as tumour biopsies. Sequential tumour and skin biopsies are feasible and safe during early-phase clinical trials, even when patients are exposed to anti-angiogenic agents. The real scientific value of such biopsies for dose selection in phase I trials has yet to be established.

A phase I, dose-finding study of sunitinib in combination with irinotecan in patients with advanced solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: Sunitinib is a multitargeted, oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor with antitumour and antiangiogenic activity. We investigated the safety and pharmacokinetics of sunitinib in combination with irinotecan in patients with advanced, refractory solid tumours. METHODS: Sunitinib was initially administered once daily at 37.5 mg per day on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle, in which irinotecan 250 mg m(-2) was given on day 1. In a second cohort, the sunitinib dose was reduced to 25 mg per day. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic studies. RESULTS: In the sunitinib 37.5 mg per day cohort, 3 out of 10 evaluable patients had objective responses, but dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of neutropenia, pneumococcal sepsis, and fatigue were observed. There were no DLTs in the sunitinib 25 mg per day cohort. Paired observations of pharmacokinetic parameter values of sunitinib and irinotecan alone vs the combination did not reveal significant drug-drug interactions. The maximum tolerated dose was defined as sunitinib 25 mg per day (days 1-14) with irinotecan 250 mg m(-2) (day 1), but no activity was observed at this dose. CONCLUSION: Although a higher sunitinib dose of 37.5 mg per day (days 1-14) with irinotecan showed preliminary evidence of antitumour activity, this dose was poorly tolerated. Therefore, this particular combination will not be pursued for further studies.

Phase 1 dose-escalation study of oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor masitinib in advanced and/or metastatic solid cancers.

BACKGROUND: Masitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with a pre-clinical profile suggesting greater affinity and selectivity in vitro for the wild-type c-Kit receptor and its juxtamembrane mutation than imatinib. METHODS: This dose-escalation study was conducted in patients with advanced and/or metastatic cancer to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for orally administered masitinib over a 12-week period. Secondary objectives were a clinical assessment of masitinib's activity in cancer patients and establishment of a pharmacokinetic profile. RESULTS: Forty patients with various solid tumours (predominantly GIST, 19 patients) were treated with masitinib at doses ranging between 0.7 and 17.2mg/kg/day. Although the MTD was not formally reached, an acceptable dose for chronic use was identified at 12 mg/kg/day. Treatment-related AEs were frequent (38/40 patients), however, the majority were grade 1 or 2 and demonstrated dose dependency at higher concentrations. Pharmacokinetic results showed a linear, dose-dependent increase of C(max) and AUC. One of two GIST patients with imatinib intolerance had a partial response at 11.1mg/kg/day. About 29% of the imatinib-resistant GIST population and 38% of the overall population had stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: The safety profile of masitinib at 12 mg/kg/day b.i.d. for the treatment of solid cancers appears favourable and compatible with a long-term regimen. Tumour control rate in imatinib-resistant patients was encouraging, hence, the activity of masitinib in c-Kit expressing tumours, such as GIST, warrants further exploration as first-line anticancer therapy as well as for imatinib-resistant patients.

Treatment outcome and survival in participants of phase I oncology trials carried out from 2003 to 2006 at Institut Gustave Roussy.

BACKGROUND: The oncology community usually perceives phase I oncology trials as associated with poor or limited benefits and substantial risks. There is scarce data concerning outcome and survival of patients enrolled in current phase I oncology trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed all phase I oncology trials conducted by investigators from the Adult Phase I Unit at Institut Gustave Roussy from 2003 to 2006. We report data concerning patient demographics, treatment outcome, toxicity, survival and type of care after trial exit. RESULTS: We analyzed 10 trials involving 180 participants. The overall response rate was 7.2%. Disease control (objective response plus stable disease) was achieved in 48.2% of patients. The rate of toxic death was 0.5%. In all, 38% of patients had at least one episode of grade 3 or 4 toxic events. The median progression-free survival and the median overall survival (OS) were 2.3 and 8.7 months, respectively. On multivariate analysis, a time between diagnosis of disease and inclusion in the phase I trial > or =24 months and evidence of disease control were statistically significant predictors of improved OS. CONCLUSION: Current phase I oncology trials are safe and are associated with clinical benefit in a substantial proportion of patients.

[Targeting angiogenesis in oncology]. / Le ciblage de l'angiogenèse en oncologie.

Advances in biology have lead to the characterization of the molecular mechanisms underlying angiogenesis, a crucial process of tumor growth. Tumor cells secrete various growth factors, including VEGF, which activate endothelial cells to form new blood vessels. Numerous drugs, at present in clinical development, interfere with the molecular mediators of angiogenesis. The death of neovessels achieved by some of such compounds allows reduction in tumor size. This review describes many angiogenesic inhibitors which mechanisms of action are quite diverse.

Procarbazine in haematology: an old drug with a new life?

Procarbazine (PCB) was developed in the 1960s and was rapidly recognised as an active agent in lymphoid malignancies. PCB was one of the four drugs combined in mechlorethamine, vincristine, PCB, prednisolone (MOPP), one of the first combination chemotherapy regimens to show that advanced-stage disease could be cured in humans. During the last few decades, comprehensive studies have clarified cellular pathways involved in the modes of action of PCB and its drug resistance mechanisms. However, late toxicities, especially secondary leukaemias and sterility, led to its withdrawal from combination regimens used to treat Hodgkin's lymphomas (HLs). PCB was recently reintroduced in dose-intensified regimens and yielded impressive results. These new regimens (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, vincristine, PCB, and prednisone (BEACOPP) or escalated BEACOPP) are now being investigated versus the classic ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) or ABVD-like combination chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of HLs.

Dose-dense regimen of temozolomide given every other week in patients with primary central nervous system tumors.

BACKGROUND: Temozolomide has shown activity and limited toxicity in patients with primary brain tumors at doses of 150-200 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-5 every 4 weeks. In this study, a new alternative dose-dense regimen of temozolomide was explored in patients with recurrent brain tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, we evaluated the safety, dose-limiting toxicity, maximum tolerated dose, recommended dose and activity of temozolomide given on days 1-3 and 14-16 every 28 days (one cycle). The starting daily dose was 200 mg/m(2) in a group of at least six patients, with subsequent increments of 50 mg/m(2) in groups of at least 12 patients until unacceptable toxicity was reached. Oral ondansetron (8 mg) was given 1 h prior to temozolomide administration. McDonald's criteria were used to evaluate antitumor activity. RESULTS: Seventy patients with brain tumors entered this study. The median number of prior chemotherapy treatments was two (range 1-3). Patients were assigned to one of four groups to receive temozolomide at daily doses of 200 (seven patients), 250 (13 patients), 300 (38 patients) and 350 mg/m(2)/day (12 patients). The absence of dose-limiting toxicity at cycle 1 led us to establish dose recommendations based on toxicity after repeated cycles. A total of 23, 72, 192 and 83 cycles were given at daily doses of 200, 250, 300 and 350 mg/m(2), respectively. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was observed in 0/7, 1/13, 5/38 and 4/12 patients treated at doses of 200, 250, 300 and 350 mg/m(2)/day, respectively. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 1/7, 0/13, 3/38 and 4/12 patients treated with 200, 250, 300 and 350 mg/m(2)/day temozolomide, respectively. At a dose of 350 mg/m(2), sustained grade 2-3 thrombocytopenia did not allow treatment to be resumed at day 14 in >40% of patients, and this dose was considered to be the maximum tolerated dose. Thus, a dose of 300 mg/m(2)/day that was associated with <20% treatment delay due to sustained hematological toxicity was considered as the recommended dose. Objective responses were reported in 13 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Temozolomide can be given safely using a dose-dense regimen of 300 mg/m(2)/day for 3 consecutive days every 2 weeks in patients with recurrent brain tumors.

Nasopharyngeal carcinomas: an update.

Among the group of head and neck cancers, nasopharyngeal carcinomas (NPC) represent a distinct entity in terms of their epidemiology, clinical presentation, biological markers, carcinogenic risk factors, prognostic factors, treatment and outcome. Undifferentiated NPC (UCNT), the most frequent histological type, is endemic in certain regions, especially in South East Asia. The disease has also been associated with the presence of the Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV). Although NPC is a radiosensitive and chemosensitive tumour, a substantial number of patients develop local recurrence or distant metastases. For patients with locoregional advanced disease, it is well known that conventional radiotherapy is insufficient in terms of both the local control rates and distant metastases. New techniques of radiation and new combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy modalities have been evaluated in numerous clinical trials in recent years. The purpose of this article is to review the current knowledge in terms of the epidemiology, biology, prognosis, management and outcome of patients with NPC.

Multicentre phase II study and pharmacokinetic analysis of irinotecan in chemotherapy-naïve patients with glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: To assess the antitumour activity and safety profile of irinotecan and its pharmacokinetic interactions with anticonvulsants in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicentre phase II and pharmacokinetic study investigated the effects of irinotecan 350 mg/m(2) given as a 90-min infusion every 3 weeks either prior to (group A) or after relapse following radiotherapy (group B) in chemotherapy-naïve patients with glioblastoma. Preferred concomitant medication for seizure prevention was valproic acid. Pharmacokinetic analysis of irinotecan and its main metabolites (SN-38, SN-38-G, APC and NPC) was performed during cycle 1. An independent panel of experts reviewed the activity data. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (25 patients in group A and 27 patients in group B) received a total of 191 cycles of irinotecan. Forty-six patients (22 patients in group A and 24 patients in group B) were evaluable and externally reviewed for activity. According to external review, one partial response (group B), seven minor responses (three in group A and four in group B), 12 disease stabilisations (seven in group A and five in group B) were observed. This resulted in an overall response rate of only 2.2% (95% confidence interval 0.2% to 6.5%). The median time to tumour progression was 9 weeks in group A and 14.4 weeks in group B. Six-month progression-free survival rates were 26% in group A and 43% in group B. Grade 3-4 toxicities (percentage of patients in groups A and B) consisted of neutropenia (12.5% and 25.9%), diarrhoea (8.3% and 7.4%), asthenia (12.5% and 7.4%) and vomiting (0% and 7.4%). The clearance of irinotecan was 12.4 and 14.4 l/h/m(2) in two patients who received no anticonvulsant. In patients receiving valproic acid, the clearance of irinotecan was 17.2 +/- 4.4 l/h/m(2). CONCLUSIONS: Irinotecan given at the dose of 350 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks has limited clinical activity as a single agent in patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma after radiotherapy. The toxicity profile and plasma disposition of irinotecan and SN-38 were not strongly influenced by anticonvulsant valproic acid therapy. Although the response rate of irinotecan as a single agent was limited, it remains an attractive drug for combination studies in patients with glioblastoma.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the new vinca alkaloid vinflunine administered as a 10-min infusion every 3 weeks in patients with advanced solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: Vinflunine is a novel vinca alkaloid obtained by semi-synthesis using super-acidic chemistry to selectively introduce two fluorine atoms at the 20' position of vinorelbine. In human tumour xenografts, vinflunine showed definite antitumour activity in seven out of 11 tumours tested compared with three out of 11 for vinorelbine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase I study, vinflunine was administered to 31 patients with advanced malignancies as a 10-min i.v. infusion every 3 weeks according to an escalating schedule of doses between 30 and 400 mg/m(2). RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic parameters and toxicities were assessed and, at 400 mg/m(2), three out of five patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity. At the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), i.e. 400 mg/m(2), the toxicity profile of vinflunine consisted mainly of mucositis, constipation and neutropenia of short duration. Vinflunine area under the curve increased as a proportion of the administered dose whereas no saturation of elimination was observed. CONCLUSION: The MTD of vinflunine was achieved at 400 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. According to protocol rules, the recommended dose was established at 350 mg/m(2). A preliminary assessment of first patients included in early phase II trials led to reduction of the recommended dose to 320 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for further development of vinflunine. Three partial responses (two in breast carcinoma, one in renal cell carcinoma) suggest that activity is likely to be seen in less heavily pretreated patient populations.