Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 31(11): 1124-7, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22668807

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prospective studies using bacterial eradication as the endpoint have demonstrated that once-daily amoxicillin is as effective as twice-daily amoxicillin for treatment of group A ß-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) pharyngitis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine, in a retrospective study, whether treatment of symptomatic GABHS pharyngitis with once-daily amoxicillin was as effective in preventing clinical recurrences as twice-daily amoxicillin or cephalexin in pediatric office practice, using patient-initiated return visits for streptococcal pharyngitis as a pragmatic, clinical endpoint. METHODS: The charts of consecutive patients 2 years of age and older with laboratory-proven GABHS pharyngitis for a period of 2 years were reviewed to identify index cases of streptococcal pharyngitis and subsequent episodes. Age, weight, antibiotic treatment and time from index to subsequent episodes of GABHS pharyngitis were recorded. RESULTS: In 1402 index episodes, patients received amoxicillin once-daily (231), amoxicillin twice-daily (846) or cephalexin (325). The risk of symptomatic streptococcal pharyngitis in the 4 months after treatment of the index episode was not statistically different among the 3 treatment groups: amoxicillin once-daily (15.1%), amoxicillin twice-daily (19.6%) and cephalexin (19.1%). There was a trend toward reduction in the risk of recurrences in the 6 weeks after completion of antibiotics in the cephalexin (9%) group compared with the combined amoxicillin (13%) groups. CONCLUSIONS: Amoxicillin once-daily or twice-daily was equally effective in terms of frequency of recurrence of symptomatic GABHS pharyngitis.


Assuntos
Amoxicilina/uso terapêutico , Cefalexina/uso terapêutico , Faringite/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Estreptocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Streptococcus pyogenes , Amoxicilina/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cefalexina/administração & dosagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Faringite/microbiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estreptocócicas/microbiologia
3.
Pediatrics ; 113(4): 924-6, 2004 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15060248

RESUMO

In the office laboratory of our private practice, the sensitivity of a single rapid antigen detection (RAD) test for group A streptococci (compared with backup throat culture) was examined over 3 winter periods. When cultures were held only 24 hours, the sensitivity was 92%; in the second period, when cultures were held to 48 hours, the sensitivity declined significantly to 86%; when the cultures were read without knowledge of the RAD test result, the sensitivity was 85%. As the Red Book Committee has suggested, physician office laboratories should validate the sensitivity of their RAD test against culture onto blood agar before abandoning the backup throat culture.


Assuntos
Antígenos de Bactérias/análise , Faringite/microbiologia , Infecções Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Streptococcus pyogenes/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Imunoensaio , Pediatria , Faringe/microbiologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Streptococcus pyogenes/imunologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...