Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Mem Stud ; 16(1): 100-112, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36789022

RESUMO

Oral history collections both rely on and preserve community memories, and are of importance for understanding marginalized communities, particularly when they privilege minority voices. This article draws from original, video-based oral histories conducted for the United Kingdom's national LGBTQ+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning, and others) museum, Queer Britain, focusing on an ongoing collection of oral histories organized around experiences related to the COVID pandemic. In order to protect the health of those interviewed and the interviewers, the researchers used virtual meeting software to record video interviews and utilized qualitative software to expand and support interview analysis. Specific oral history methodologies and concepts are explored, and museum studies content is briefly discussed, specifically as it relates to museums of marginalized people. Themes explored include isolation and timelessness, the impact of the pandemic on diverse LGBTQ+ communities, and HIV/AIDS.

2.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 21(3): 847-848.e2, 2023 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34998994

RESUMO

Evacuation disorders are common among chronically constipated (CC) patients who fail to respond to laxatives and are typically diagnosed by anorectal manometry (ARM) and/or balloon expulsion testing (BET).1,2 Recently, there has been emerging interest in the use of defecation posture-modifying devices (DPMDs) to improve constipation symptoms, presumably by replicating the physiologic benefits of squatting on stool evacuation, such as straightening of the anorectal angle and relaxing the pelvic floor. However, the ability of DPMDs to normalize anorectal function in adult patients with CC has not been studied.


Assuntos
Constipação Intestinal , Defecação , Adulto , Humanos , Defecação/fisiologia , Manometria , Reto , Canal Anal , Postura
3.
Dig Dis Sci ; 68(4): 1403-1410, 2023 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36173584

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The effect of age and gender differences on anorectal function, symptoms severity, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with chronic constipation (CC) is not well studied. This study examines the impact of age and gender on anorectal function testing (AFT) characteristics, symptoms burden, and QoL in patients with CC. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 2550 adults with CC who completed AFT. Collected data include demographics, sphincter response to simulated defecation during anorectal manometry (ARM), balloon expulsion testing (BET), and validated surveys assessing constipation symptoms and QoL. DD was defined as both the inability to relax the anal sphincter during simulated defecation and an abnormal BET. RESULTS: 2550 subjects were included in the analysis (mean age = 48.6 years). Most patients were female (81.6%) and Caucasian (82%). 73% were < 60 years old (mean = 41) vs. 27% ≥ 60 years old (mean = 69). The prevalence of impaired anal sphincter relaxation on ARM, abnormal BET, and DD in patients with CC was 48%, 42.1%, and 22.9%, respectively. Patients who were older and male were significantly more frequently diagnosed with DD and more frequently had impaired anal sphincter relaxation on ARM, compared to patients who were younger and female (p < 0.05). Conversely, CC patients who were younger and female reported greater constipation symptoms severity and more impaired QoL (p ≤ 0.004). CONCLUSION: Among patients with CC referred for anorectal function testing, men and those older than 60 are more likely to have dyssynergic defecation, but women and patients younger than 60 experience worse constipation symptoms and QoL.


Assuntos
Defecação , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Defecação/fisiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Manometria , Constipação Intestinal/diagnóstico , Constipação Intestinal/epidemiologia , Canal Anal , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reto
4.
Dis Esophagus ; 35(4)2022 Apr 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34607359

RESUMO

Acid exposure time (AET) <4% on ambulatory reflux monitoring definitively rules out pathologic gastroesophageal acid reflux, while AET >6% indicates pathologic reflux per the Lyon Consensus, leaving AET of 4-6% as borderline. We aimed to elucidate the borderline AET population and identify metrics that could help differentiate this group. A total of 50 subjects in each group, AET <4, 4-6, and >6% on pH-impedance monitoring between 2015 and 2019, were retrospectively reviewed. In addition to demographic and clinical information, the extracted data included mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) on reflux study and high-resolution manometry (HRM) parameters and diagnosis. After excluding patients with prior foregut surgery, major esophageal motility disorder, or unreliable impedance testing, a total of 89 subjects were included in the analysis (25 with normal AET < 4%, 38 with borderline 4-6%, 26 with abnormal >6%). MNBI in borderline AET patients was significantly lower compared to normal AET (1607.7 vs. 2524.0 ohms, P < 0.01), and higher than abnormal AET (951.5 ohms, P < 0.01). Borderline subjects had a greater frequency of ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) diagnosis per Chicago classification v3.0 (42.1 vs. 8.0%, P = 0.01), but did not demonstrate any differences compared to abnormal subjects (34.6%, P = 0.56). Patients with borderline AET had an average MNBI that was in between normal AET and abnormal AET. Borderline AET patients also commonly demonstrate IEM on HRM, similar to those with abnormal AET. Our findings can be potentially useful in assigning higher clinical significance for patients found to have borderline AET with concomitant low MNBI and IEM on manometry.


Assuntos
Transtornos da Motilidade Esofágica , Refluxo Gastroesofágico , Humanos , Impedância Elétrica , Transtornos da Motilidade Esofágica/complicações , Transtornos da Motilidade Esofágica/diagnóstico , Monitoramento do pH Esofágico , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/complicações , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Manometria , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 116(4): 780-787, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33982948

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The North American Consensus guidelines for glucose breath testing (GBT) for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) incorporated changes in glucose dosing and diagnostic cutoffs. We compared GBT positivity based on hydrogen and methane excretion and quantified symptoms during performance of the North American vs older modified Rome Consensus protocols. METHODS: GBT was performed using the North American protocol (75 g glucose, cutoffs >20 parts per million [ppm] hydrogen increase after glucose and >10 ppm methane anytime) in 3,102 patients vs modified Rome protocol (50 g glucose, >12 ppm hydrogen and methane increases after glucose) in 3,193 patients with suspected SIBO. RESULTS: Positive GBT were more common with the North American vs modified Rome protocol (39.5% vs 29.7%, P < 0.001). Overall percentages with GBT positivity using methane criteria were greater and hydrogen criteria lower with the North American protocol (P < 0.001). Peak methane levels were higher for the North American protocol (P < 0.001). Times to peak hydrogen and methane production were not different between protocols. With the North American protocol, gastrointestinal and extraintestinal symptoms were more prevalent after glucose with both positive and negative GBT (P < 0.04) and greater numbers of symptoms (P < 0.001) were reported. DISCUSSION: GBT performed using the North American Consensus protocol was more often positive for SIBO vs the modified Rome protocol because of more prevalent positive methane excretion. Symptoms during testing were greater with the North American protocol. Implications of these observations on determining breath test positivity and antibiotic decisions for SIBO await future prospective testing.


Assuntos
Infecções Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Testes Respiratórios/métodos , Consenso , Glucose/farmacologia , Enteropatias/diagnóstico , Intestino Delgado/microbiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/metabolismo , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Hidrogênio/análise , Enteropatias/metabolismo , Enteropatias/microbiologia , Masculino , Metano/análise , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 114(11): 1772-1777, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31592781

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The impact of opioids on anorectal function is poorly understood but potentially relevant to the pathogenesis of opioid-induced constipation (OIC). To evaluate anorectal function testing (AFT) characteristics, symptom burden, and quality of life in chronically constipated patients prescribed an opioid (OIC) in comparison with constipated patients who are not on an opioid (NOIC). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 3,452 (OIC = 588 and NOIC = 2,864) chronically constipated patients (Rome 3) who completed AFT. AFT variables included anal sphincter pressure and response during simulated defecation, balloon expulsion test (BET), and rectal sensation. Dyssynergic defecation (DD) was defined as an inability to relax the anal sphincter during simulated defecation and an abnormal BET. Patients completed Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) and Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) questionnaires. RESULTS: The mean age of the study cohort was 49 years. Most patients were women (82%) and whites (83%). Patients with OIC were older than NOIC patients (50.7 vs 48.3, P = 0.001). OIC patients were significantly more likely to have DD (28.6% vs 21.4%, P < 0.001), an abnormal simulated defecation response on anorectal manometry (59% vs 43.8%, P < 0.001), and an abnormal BET (48% vs 42.5%, P = 0.02) than NOIC patients. OIC patients reported more severe constipation symptoms (P < 0.02) and worse quality of life (P < 0.05) than NOIC patients. DISCUSSION: Chronically constipated patients who use opioids are more likely to have DD and more severe constipation symptoms than NOIC.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Ataxia , Doenças Funcionais do Colo , Constipação Intestinal , Qualidade de Vida , Doenças Retais , Ataxia/induzido quimicamente , Ataxia/diagnóstico , Ataxia/fisiopatologia , Doença Crônica , Doenças Funcionais do Colo/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Funcionais do Colo/diagnóstico , Doenças Funcionais do Colo/fisiopatologia , Constipação Intestinal/diagnóstico , Constipação Intestinal/etiologia , Constipação Intestinal/fisiopatologia , Constipação Intestinal/psicologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Defecação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Manometria/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças Retais/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Retais/diagnóstico , Doenças Retais/fisiopatologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...