RESUMO
The registration of herbicides in the European Union requires an assessment of risks to nontarget terrestrial plants (NTTPs). Regulatory plant studies are performed to determine risk-assessment-relevant endpoints (50% effect rate) for quantitative parameters, mostly biomass and survival. Recently, the European Food Safety Authority stated that endpoints for qualitatively assessed plant visual injuries (PVIs) such as necrosis, chlorosis, and so forth should be considered for the risk assessment as equal to endpoints derived from quantitatively determined parameters. However, the lack of guidance in the NTTP test guidelines on how to assess PVI and how to derive a statistically meaningful endpoint for PVI makes their use in risk assessments challenging. To evaluate and improve the reliability, reproducibility, and regulatory relevance of PVI assessments in NTTP studies, the PVI Working Group was formed in 2022 within the SETAC Plant Interest Group. In a first exercise, research needs, guidance gaps, and shortcomings in current methodologies were identified and are presented together with recommendations for a future, validated, and harmonized method for the assessment of PVI. Survey results revealed a high variability in how PVI are currently assessed, and that the reliability of these data is unclear. Under current conditions, the PVI data can rather be seen as supportive information instead of using the data for the statistically sound determination of a regulatory endpoint. Consequently, standardization and harmonization of procedures for the assessment of PVI are needed. An improved scoring methodology should be developed that allows for a precise, statistically sound endpoint determination. Regarding the regulatory relevance of PVI, further research is required to assess the biological meaning of PVI data and how this is connected to the regulatory requirements and protection goals. Last but not least, guidance is required on how to evaluate the historically available PVI data that are based on various assessment methodologies. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2023;00:1-9. © 2023 The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
RESUMO
We evaluated the recovery of photosynthesis and growth rate in green (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata), blue-green (Anabaena flos-aquae), and diatom (Navicula pelliculosa) algae after pulsed exposure to atrazine. Subsequent to a grow-up period of 24 to 72 h to establish requisite cell density for adequate signal strength to measure photosystem II (PSII) quantum yield, algae were exposed to a pulse of atrazine for 48 h followed by a 48-h recovery period in control media. Photosynthesis was measured at 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h of the exposure and recovery phases using pulse amplitude modulation fluorometry; growth rate and cell density were also concomitantly measured at these time points. Exposure to atrazine resulted in immediate, but temporary, inhibition of photosynthesis and growth; however, these effects were transient and fully reversible in the tested species of algae. For all three algal species, no statistically significant reductions (p ≤ 0.05) in growth rate or PSII quantum yield were detected at any of the treatment concentrations 48 h after atrazine was removed from the test system. Effects at test levels up to the highest tested exposure levels were consequently determined to be algistatic (reversible). Both biochemically and physiologically, recovery of photosynthesis and growth rate occur immediately, reaching control levels within hours following exposure. Therefore, pulsed exposure profiles of atrazine typically measured in Midwestern U.S. streams are unlikely to result in biologically meaningful changes in primary production given that the effects of atrazine are temporary and fully reversible in species representative of native populations.
