Unilateral Snapping Biceps Femoris Tendon with an Anomalous Insertion Treated with Anatomic Repositioning and Lengthening with a Single Suture Anchor: A Report of Two Cases.

CASE: A snapping biceps femoris tendon, a rare etiology for symptomatic pain in the lateral aspect of the knee, has been reported infrequently. We report 2 cases of an acutely symptomatic unilateral snapping biceps femoris tendon with an intraoperatively intact anomalous insertion onto the tibia, which were treated with anatomic repositioning and "pie-crust" lengthening via a single suture anchor. CONCLUSION: Anatomic repositioning and lengthening is a novel technique that successfully resolved the painful snapping and allowed full return to competitive sports by 6 months postoperatively, with maintenance of improvement at ≥14 months postoperatively.

Short Stem Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Periprosthetic Type A Fracture.

Alterations have been made over the years to the standard reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) prosthetic components in an effort to decrease adverse events; this has led to the advent of a short humeral stem prosthesis. To the authors' knowledge, there are no reports describing the complication of a traumatic periprosthetic Wright and Cofield classification type A fracture with use of a short metaphyseal humeral stem component for RTSA. The authors describe a 49-year-old woman with this pathology who was treated with open reduction and internal fixation using a proximal humerus locking plate, unicortical and bicortical screw fixation, and a cerclage wire construct without the need to violate the shoulder joint or revise components. Three months postoperatively, she was instructed to begin active range of motion in physical therapy. At 13 months postoperatively, the patient rated her pain level at an average 5 of 10 in severity, with active assisted scaption to 125°, external rotation to 15°, and internal rotation to L5. Radiographs at this time revealed a well-healed fracture. This not only indicates the previously unreported occurrence of such a complication pattern, which was thought rare with the advent of the short humeral RTSA stem, but also provides a viable intraoperative strategy for open reduction and internal fixation with a proximal humerus locking plate, unicortical and bicortical screw fixation, and a cerclage wire construct without the need to violate the shoulder joint. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(4):e721-e724.].

Dial Test: Unrecognized Predictor of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury on tibial external rotation as measured by the dial test. METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients scheduled to undergo a primary ACL reconstruction were prospectively evaluated. Physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging findings were analyzed to exclude multiligamentous injury. The dial test was performed with the patient under anesthesia with a goniometer on both the affected and unaffected knees at 30° and 90°. Intraoperatively, the arthroscopic posterolateral corner gaps before reconstruction and after reconstruction were documented. Postoperatively, the dial test was again performed on both knees at 30° and 90°. RESULTS: At 30°, there was a significantly larger dial test result in the affected knee before ACL reconstruction compared with after ACL reconstruction (27.6° vs 21.0°, P < .0001) and compared with the unaffected knee (27.6° vs 20.5°, P < .0001), but this difference was eliminated after reconstruction (21.0° vs 20.5°, P = .5089). At 90°, there was a significantly larger dial test result in the affected knee before ACL reconstruction compared with after ACL reconstruction (27.6° vs 21.1°, P < .0001) and compared with the unaffected knee (27.6° vs 20.9°, P < .0001), with this difference was eliminated after reconstruction (21.1° vs 20.9°, P = .7831). CONCLUSIONS: Incompetence of the ACL accounts for nearly 7° of tibial external rotation found by the dial test. During examination of an injured knee, if the dial test is positive, an isolated ACL injury should not be excluded. Findings of the dial test should thus be interpreted with caution in the setting of ACL injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative study.

Arthroscopic Repair of Isolated Subscapularis Tears: A Systematic Review of Technique-Specific Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To systematically review the literature to identify all studies reporting outcomes of arthroscopically repaired isolated subscapularis tears, to (1) report outcomes across all repair techniques, (2) compare outcomes by arthroscopic technique, and (3) highlight the frequency and management of associated long head of biceps pathology, and the influence of these concomitant procedures on outcomes following arthroscopic subscapularis repair. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted using the MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases with the following term: ("isolated repair" AND "arthroscopic subscapularis tear"). Only studies evaluating the techniques and outcomes of isolated subscapularis repair were included. Data were extracted, including patient characteristics, surgical technique, and outcomes. Descriptive analysis was provided for the available literature. RESULTS: Eight studies were included in this review. Uniformly, improvements in patient-reported outcome scores were substantial after arthroscopic subscapularis repair. Constant Total scores improved in each individual study from preoperative to postoperative (range, Δ18.8-Δ49.8 points), as did Strength (range, Δ1.3-Δ13.7 points), Pain (range, Δ7.6-Δ8.9 points), Range of Motion (range, Δ7.3-Δ13.3 points), and Activities of Daily Living (range, Δ8.7-Δ10.2 points) subscores. Significant improvements were seen in most individual studies for belly-press (Δ21.6 N or Δ1.9 out of 5) and lift-off strength (Δ24.3 N or Δ1.7-Δ1.9 out of 5), range of motion in forward flexion (29.1°-37.0°), external rotation (10.3°-16.0°), and internal rotation. Complications were relatively infrequent overall, with 5 studies reporting no complications, and the remaining 3 studies with rerupture rates between 4.8% and 11.8%. Studies that used only double-row repair reported fewer complications (0% vs 5%-10%) and better outcome scores than single-row repair, similar to those studies that uniformly performed biceps tenodesis compared with no biceps intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This descriptive study highlights that arthroscopic subscapularis repair appears to be a reasonable option for the treatment of isolated tears of the subscapularis to obtain successful functional and patient-reported clinical outcomes. Its findings also pose the question of whether future prospective, comparative studies will find double-row surgical fixation and concomitant biceps tenodesis surgery to be superior to single-row fixation and leaving the biceps alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level IV studies.

Optimization of Anteromedial Portal Femoral Tunnel Drilling With Flexible and Straight Reamers in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis.

PURPOSE: To use 3-dimensional custom CAD technology to evaluate how knee flexion angle affects femoral tunnel length and distance to the posterior wall when using curved and straight guides for drilling through the anteromedial portal (AMP). METHODS: Six cadaveric knees were placed in an external fixator at various degrees of flexion (90°, 110°, 125°, and maximum 135° to 140°). Computed tomography scans were obtained at all flexion points for 3-dimensional point-cloud models. Using custom CAD software, surgical guides through the AMP were replicated along with virtual tunnels at each flexion angle. Distance from the posterior cortex and tunnel dimensions were collected after 8-mm and 10-mm tunnel creation. RESULTS: At 90° of flexion, the average tunnel length down the posterior aspect of 8-mm tunnel was 25.0 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.2-33.8) and 12.0 mm (95% CI 7.3-16.7) for curved and straight guides, respectively; 31.0 mm (95% CI 26.8-35.2) and 28.6 mm (95% CI 24.8-32.4) at 110°; 33.8 mm (95% CI 30.1-37.5) and 31.1 mm (95% CI 26.8-35.4) at 125°; and 35.0 mm (95% CI 34.1-35.9) and 35.5 mm (95% CI 34.2-36.8) with maximal flexion. Values between curved and straight guides are significantly different (P < .001), with straight guides breaching the posterior wall at 90° and 110° of flexion in some specimens. The average distance to the posterior wall cortex was 0.9 mm (95% CI -1.5 to 3.3) and -0.6 mm (95% CI -2.3 to 1.1) for curved and straight guides, respectively, at 90° of flexion (P = .014); 2.3 mm (95% CI -0.2 to 4.8) and -0.1 mm (95% CI -2.4 to 2.2) at 110° (P = .001); 4.4 mm (95% CI 2.8-6.0) and 3.9 mm (95% CI 1.9-5.9) at 125° (P = .299); and 6.7 mm (95% CI 6.2-7.2) and 8.3 mm (95% CI 6.1-10.5) at maximal flexion (P = .184). Posterior wall blowout was noted when using 10-mm straight guides at both 90° (2 specimens) and 110° (3 specimens). Using 10-mm curved guides posterior blowout was noted in 1 specimen at 90°. Maximum footprint coverage occurred at 110° for straight guides and 90° for curved guides. CONCLUSIONS: When using the AMP, flexible guides and reamers result in a greater distance of the tunnel to the femoral cortex while preserving adequate tunnel length at lower knee flexion angles. To create long femoral tunnels without breaching the posterior cortex, the knee should be flexed to at least 110° for curved reamers and 125° for straight. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Femoral tunnel drilling through the AMP using curved and straight reamers requires different degrees of knee flexion to achieve optimal tunnel dimensions.

Publication rates of podium presentations at the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons annual open versus closed meetings 2008 to 2012.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to analyze the publication rate for abstracts presented at podium presentations from the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) annual open and closed meetings from 2008 to 2012. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Abstracts accepted as podium presentations for the open and closed meetings from 2008 through 2012 were followed. A search was performed using Google Scholar and PubMed for all published manuscripts. This analysis looks at abstracts categorized based on annual meeting (open versus closed) and by meeting year (2008-2012). Data including publication journal, publication date, and level of evidence were recorded. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, and odds ratios were performed with p < 0.05 significance. RESULTS: A total of 365 abstracts were accepted to the open and closed annual meetings from 2008 to 2012, with 49% and 51% presented in open and closed forums. A total of 222 (61%) were published within 3-years in peer-reviewed journals. No difference existed in 3-year publication rate between open and closed podium presentation meetings (112/178, 63% open; 110/187, 59% closed; p = 0.4229); however, presentations at closed meetings were more likely to be published after 3-years compared to open meetings (2/178, 2% open; 15/187, 12% closed; p = 0.002). Most common journal of publication was the Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (JSES) (50%). CONCLUSIONS: Podium abstracts presented at the open and closed annual meetings have publication rates of 63% and 59% with overall combined publication rates of 61% from 2008 to 2012. The high publication rate and high impact of publications speak to the exemplary educational value of ASES annual meetings.

Publication Rates of Podium Versus Poster Presentations at the Arthroscopy Association of North America Meetings 2008-2012.

PURPOSE: To analyze the publication rate of poster and podium presentations at Arthroscopy Association of North America (AANA) annual meetings from 2008 to 2012. METHODS: An online search using PubMed and Google Scholar for all published manuscripts associated with abstracts presented from 2008 to 2012 AANA annual meetings was performed. Abstracts were classified by presentation type (poster vs podium), and the journal and publication date were recorded for all published abstracts. Descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and Fisher's exact tests were performed, with P < .05 considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 1,508 abstracts were submitted to AANA annual meetings from 2008 to 2012, with 976 abstracts accepted for presentation (65% overall acceptance rate). There were 328 podium (22% acceptance rate) and 648 poster (43% acceptance rate) presentations. Of the 976 accepted abstracts, 479 (49%) were published within 3 years in peer-reviewed journals. The overall publication rates for podium and poster presentations were 59% (n = 193) and 44% (n = 286), respectively. Podium presentations were significantly more likely to be published within 3 years compared with poster presentations (P < .0001; odds ratio 1.8095, confidence interval 1.3826-2.3682). There were no differences in time to publication between podium and poster presentations (1.3 ± 1.2 vs 1.1 ± 1.3 years, P = .0633). Over the 5-year study period, the overall abstract acceptance rate (P < .0001) and the rate of abstracts accepted for poster presentation (P < .0001) increased significantly over time, whereas there was no increase in the rate of abstracts accepted for podium presentation (P = .5638). The most common journals of publication were Arthroscopy (n = 157, 32.7%) followed by American Journal of Sports Medicine (n = 93, 19.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The overall publication rate of abstracts presented at AANA annual meetings is 49%, with podium presentations 1.8 times more likely to be published than poster presentations. The overall abstract acceptance rate and the rate of abstracts accepted for poster presentation increased significantly over time, whereas there was no significant increase in the rate of abstracts accepted for podium presentation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The publication rates of abstracts presented at the AANA annual meetings demonstrate the meetings' impact and importance to the advancement of the scientific literature.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Quadriceps Versus Achilles Tendon Bone Block Allograft.

BACKGROUND: Long-term studies of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction suggest that normal stability is not restored in the majority of patients. The Achilles tendon allograft is frequently utilized, although recently, the quadriceps tendon has been introduced as an alternative option due to its size and high patellar bone density. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical strength of PCL reconstructions using a quadriceps versus an Achilles allograft. The hypothesis was that quadriceps bone block allograft has comparable mechanical properties to those of Achilles bone block allograft. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Twenty-nine fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were assigned to 1 of 3 groups: (1) intact PCL, (2) PCL reconstruction with Achilles tendon allograft, or (3) PCL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon allograft. After reconstruction, all supporting capsular and ligamentous tissues were removed. Posterior tibial translation was measured at neutral and 20° external rotation. Each specimen underwent a preload, 2 cyclic loading protocols of 500 cycles, then load to failure. RESULTS: Construct creep deformation was significantly lower in the intact group compared with both Achilles and quadriceps allograft (P = .008). The intact specimens reached the greatest ultimate load compared with both reconstructions (1974 ± 752 N, P = .0001). The difference in ultimate load for quadriceps versus Achilles allograft was significant (P = .048), with the quadriceps group having greater maximum force during failure testing. No significant differences were noted between quadriceps versus Achilles allograft for differences in crosshead excursion during cyclic testing (peak-valley [P-V] extension stretch), creep deformation, or stiffness. Construct stiffness measured during the failure test was greatest in the intact group (117 ± 9 N/mm, P = .0001) compared with the Achilles (43 ± 11 N/mm) and quadriceps (43 ± 7 N/mm) groups. CONCLUSION: While the quadriceps trended to be a stronger construct with a greater maximum load and stiffness required during load to failure, only maximum force in comparison with the Achilles reached statistical significance. Quadriceps and Achilles tendon allografts had similar other biomechanical characteristics when used for a PCL reconstruction, but both were inferior to the native PCL. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The quadriceps tendon is a viable graft option in PCL reconstruction as it exhibits a greater maximum force and is otherwise comparable to the Achilles allograft. These findings expand allograft availability in PCL reconstruction.

Growth Abnormalities Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the Skeletally Immature Patient: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To identify all reported cases of growth disturbances after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in patients with open growth plates and analyze trends with respect to different surgical techniques, graft choices, and methods of fixation. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases with the following term: "((anterior cruciate ligament OR ACL) AND ((((immature) OR growth plates) OR physes) OR pediatric))." Only studies that evaluated ACL reconstruction in patients with open growth plates and reported angular malformations or limb length discrepancy were included. Data were extracted, including patient characteristics, surgical technique, and postoperative growth disturbance. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies containing 39 patients with growth abnormalities were included in the review. Mean chronological age was 13 years, and 89% of patients were male. Overall, there were 16 cases of angular malformations and 29 cases of limb length discrepancy. The most common angular malformation was genu valgum (81%, n = 13; mean of 6.5°). The most common surgical technique on the tibia and femur was transphyseal (54%, and 77% respectively), and the most common graft used was hamstring autograft (58%). Among patients with limb length discrepancy, overgrowth was most common (62%, n = 18; mean of 13 mm). Interestingly, we observed that 50% of patients with overgrowth underwent a physeal-sparing technique, whereas 64% of patients with shortening underwent a transphyseal technique. CONCLUSIONS: At present, there are 21 studies reporting 39 patients with growth abnormalities in the current literature, of which 29 cases were of limb length discrepancy and 16 of angular malformation. Of the 29 cases of limb length discrepancy, limb overgrowth accounted for 62% of cases. Perhaps most interestingly, physeal-sparing techniques were performed in 25% of the cases of angular malformation and 47% cases of limb length discrepancy, despite the commonly held belief that this technique mitigates the risks of ACL reconstruction by not violating the growth plate. According to this study, it is clear that growth abnormalities after ACL reconstruction in the skeletally immature patient are underreported, and our current understanding of the etiology of these abnormalities is limited. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level II to IV studies.