Pretreatment plasma testosterone and estradiol levels in patients with locally advanced or metastasized prostatic cancer. FINNPROSTATE Group.

BACKGROUND: Studies concerning pretreatment plasma hormonal environment in relation to stage of prostatic cancer have given conflicting results. The aim of the present study was to compare the pretreatment plasma testosterone (T), free T (fT), estradiol (E2), and free E2 (fE2) levels in patients with locally advanced (T3-4 M0) and metastatic (T1-4 M1) prostatic cancer, and to further examine the effect of the patients' general condition on these levels. METHODS: The present series consisted of 238 patients (Finnprostate 6 study). The variables analyzed were E2, fE2, T, fT, age, body mass index (BMI), sex hormone binding globulin capacity (SHBG), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), hemoglobin concentration (Hb), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and performance status (PS). RESULTS: The E2 and fE2 levels were significantly higher in M0 patients than in M1 patients, with no significant differences in T and fT levels. In multivariate analyses, a decline in performance status (PS), an increase in ESR, or a decrease in Hb, were related to a decrease in T, fT, E2, or fE2 levels. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment plasma estradiol was significantly lower in M1 patients than in M0 patients, but there were no significant differences in T levels, although the poor general condition was related to a decrease in the pretreatment levels of both testosterone and estradiol.

Parenteral polyoestradiol phosphate vs orchidectomy in the treatment of advanced prostatic cancer. Efficacy and cardiovascular complications: a 2-year follow-up report of a national, prospective prostatic cancer study. Finnprostate Group.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and cardiovascular complications of orchidectomy or polyoestradiol phosphate (PEP) in the treatment of advanced prostatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a prospective, randomized study 444 patients (mean age 73 years, range 45-91) with T3-4 M0 or T1-4 M1 prostatic cancer were treated either by orchidectomy (group 1, n = 217) or parenteral PEP (group 2, n = 227; 240 mg/month). The patients were examined at 3 and 6 months after start of the therapy and thereafter every 6 months; they were also assessed whenever they had symptoms indicating progression. Possible cardiovascular complications included myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis. RESULTS: After a follow-up of 2 years there was no statistically significant difference between the groups in progression-free time; 65 of 217 (30%) patients in group 1 showed evidence of progression, including seven (3%) who died from prostate cancer. In group 2, 64 of 227 (28%) patients showed progression and eight (3.5%) died from prostatic cancer. There were 10 (5%) cardiovascular complications in patients in group 1, including five (2%) cardiovascular deaths; in group 2 there were 24 (11%) and 14 (6%), respectively. During the first year of treatment there were three (1.4%) cardiovascular complications in group 1 and 14 (6%) in group 2 (P < 0.05), and during the second year, seven (4%) and 10 (6%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Parenteral PEP (240 mg/month) seems to be as efficient as orchidectomy in inhibiting disease in patients with advanced prostatic cancer (T3-4 M0 and T1-4 M1). There were more cardiovascular complications in patients treated with PEP than after orchidectomy; the difference was statistically significant during the first year of treatment.

High dose polyoestradiol phosphate with and without acetosalicylic acid versus orchiectomy in the treatment of prostatic cancer. Finnprostate Group.

The clinical efficacy of high dose (160 mg) polyoestradiol phosphate (PEP) was compared with that of orchiectomy in a prospective randomised multicentre study including 200 prostatic cancer patients. The effect of daily low dose (75 mg) acetosalicylic acid (ASA) on possible cardiovascular complications during the first 6 months of therapy was also evaluated. Oestrogen-treated patients had more progressions, but follow-up was too short to draw any definite conclusions on the efficacy of treatment. There was no cardiovascular mortality and there were no thromboembolic complications in any treatment group. It was concluded that parenteral high dose PEP is not associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular complications and there is no need for daily low dose ASA.