Is reassessment of Computed Tomography Reports Worthwhile in Acute Diverticulitis?

INTRODUCTION: Since the assessment of the disease severity in acute diverticulitis (AD) is of utmost importance to determine the optimal treatment and the need for follow-up investigations, we wanted to investigate whether the first CT report is compatible with daytime reassessment report and whether the value of initial report changes according to the experience of the radiologist. METHODS: Consecutive patients from tertiary referral centre with AD were included. CT images done in the emergency department were initially analysed by either resident radiologists or consultant radiologists and then later reanalysed by consultant abdominal radiologists. Discrepancies between reports were noted. RESULTS: Of total of 562 patients with AD, CT images were reanalysed in 439 cases. In 22 reports (5.0%) the final report was significantly different from the initial report and management changed in 20 cases. In reports of uncomplicated acute diverticulitis, reanalysis changed initial assessment in 4.0% of the cases and in complicated acute diverticulitis (CAD) in 9.1%. When consultant and resident radiologists were compared, there was no significant difference. CONCLUSION: Although no statistical difference could be noted between residents and consultants, the final report was significantly different in overall 5% of the cases when reanalysed at normal working hours by an experienced consultant abdominal radiologist. Therefore, we conclude that reassessment of CT reports is worthwhile in AD.

P-suPAR may reflect the inflammatory response after pancreatic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Several different scoring systems have been developed to predict post-pancreatectomy complications. Currently used inflammatory markers are of only limited value in predicting complications after pancreatic surgery. Plasma soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (P-suPAR) is a prognostic biomarker associated with different inflammatory conditions. The aim of this study was to investigate P-suPAR levels before and after pancreatic surgery. METHODS: One hundred and seventy-six patients evaluated for pancreatic surgery due to suspected malignant or premalignant lesion were recruited for this study at Tampere University Hospital between 2016 and 2021. P-suPAR was analyzed before the planned operation and on postoperative days (PODs) one and three. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-three patients [median age 67 (range 33-84) years, 50 % male] underwent a pancreatic surgery procedure. Compared to preoperative values [median 3.7 (IQR 3.1-4.7) ng/mL], P-suPAR was significantly lower on PODs 1 [3.2 (2.5-3.9) ng/mL; p < 0.001] and 3 [3.2 (2.7-4.1) ng/mL; p < 0.001]. P-suPAR on POD 1 was significantly lower in patients with postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) [2.6 (2.1-3.4) ng/mL] than in patients with no POPF [3.2 (2.6-3.8) ng/mL; p = 0.007]. Similar decreases in P-suPAR values were seen in patients with postoperative acute pancreatitis (POAP) and surgical site infection (SSI). CONCLUSIONS: After pancreatic surgery, P-suPAR level on POD 1 is significantly lower in patients with POPF, POAP or SSI. P-suPAR is decreased after pancreatic resection in all patients. This type of postoperative P-suPAR profile has not previously been described, and may reflect the compensatory anti-inflammatory reaction following the initial systemic inflammatory reaction caused by surgical trauma.

Plasma soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (P-suPAR) in the diagnostics between malignant and non-malignant pancreatic lesions.

BACKGROUND: Soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a biomarker elevated in several inflammatory conditions and cancers. It has recently been shown to be elevated in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Plasma suPAR (P-suPAR) predicts the severity of the disease in first acute alcohol-induced pancreatitis (AAP) and ten-year mortality after recovery from first AAP. According to our previous results, P-suPAR is not elevated in chronic pancreatitis (CP) and could possibly be used in distinguishing pancreatic cancer (PC) from CP. When imaging creates a suspicion of a pancreatic lesion, the distinction between malignant and non-malignant disease is crucial. Additional tools are needed, and we still lack a sufficiently sensitive and specific biomarker. Our aim was to further investigate whether preoperatively measured P-suPAR is beneficial in distinguishing between malignant and non-malignant pancreatic lesions. METHODS: One hundred and seventy-six patients evaluated in Tampere University Hospital for pancreatic surgery for suspected malignant pancreatic lesion were recruited for the study. The final study group consisted of 113 patients. P-suPAR and other covariates were measured before the planned operation. RESULTS: P-suPAR was significantly higher in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) [median 4.1 (IQR 3.3-5.1) ng/mL] than in patients with non-malignant [3.3 (2.9-4.4) ng/mL; p = 0.012] histology. ROC curve analysis resulted in an AUC of 0.65 (95% CI 0.55-0.76); p = 0.007 and a cutoff value of 3.2 ng/mL. Crosstabulation yielded sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 43%. A combination of positive P-suPAR and elevated plasma carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (P-CA19-9) tests did not improve sensitivity but elevated specificity up to 86-88%. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative P-suPAR is elevated in patients with PC compared to patients with a non-malignant pancreatic lesion. Combining P-suPAR with P-CA19-9 may improve diagnostic accuracy.

Plasma suPAR may help to distinguish between chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.

OBJECTIVES: SuPAR (soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor) is a biomarker reflecting the inflammatory state of the human body. Earlier studies suggest that urinary suPAR/creatinine ratio levels are elevated in chronic pancreatitis (CP), and that plasma suPAR (P-suPAR) level is elevated in pancreatic cancer (PC). Our aim was to study the levels of P-suPAR in CP in a long-term prospective follow-up setting to explore the possibility of distinguishing between PC and CP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two patient groups were compared. The first group included 83 patients who were prospectively followed up after their first acute alcohol-induced pancreatitis (AAP) for median 7.0 (range 0.3-9.8) years. Twelve patients in this group developed CP during follow-up, and two patients were further excluded from the CP cohort. The second group consisted of 25 patients operated on for suspicion of pancreatic malignancy and final pathological diagnosis of PC. P-suPAR levels were measured and compared within and between these groups. RESULTS: P-suPAR levels remained low during follow-up despite the development of CP. P-suPAR was significantly higher in PC patients [median 3.7 (IQR 3.1-4.4) ng/mL] than in CP patients [2.6 (1.8-3.6) ng/mL]; p = .014. A cutoff value of 2.8 ng/mL resulted from a ROC curve with area under curve (AUC) of 0.79 (95% CI 0.61-0.97), p = .009 in differentiation between PC and CP with a sensitivity and a specificity of 88% and 70% respectively. CONCLUSION: P-suPAR is higher in patients with PC than in patients with CP, and it could thus be used in differentiating between PC and CP.

Plasma level of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) predicts long-term mortality after first acute alcohol-induced pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a biomarker associated with inflammatory and certain malignancies. Earlier we have shown that plasma suPAR (P-suPAR) predicts severity of acute alcohol-induced pancreatitis (AAP) on admission. Our aim was to investigate whether P-suPAR levels predict AAP recurrences or mortality during long-term follow-up after first AAP. METHODS: Eighty-three patients (median age 47.5, range 25-71 years) suffering their first AAP during 2001-2005 were recruited and followed prospectively for 9 years with a median follow-up time of 7.0 (range 0.3-9.8) years. P-suPAR was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) from the samples taken at follow-up visits. Survival was registered in November 2014. RESULTS: P-suPAR level on admission or after recovery of the first AAP did not predict the recurrence of AAP. However, higher P-suPAR measured after recovery of first AAP (3.6 vs. 2.9 ng/mL) predicted mortality during follow-up period (hazard ratio 1.48, p = .008). Cut-off value for P-suPAR indicating a higher risk for 10-year mortality resulted a value of ≥3.4 ng/mL. When adjusted for other covariates, P-suPAR above cut-off level retained its statistical significance as an independent factor. CONCLUSIONS: P-suPAR level on admission or after recovery of the first AAP does not predict the recurrence of AAP during long-term follow-up. However, P-suPAR ≥3.4 mg/mL measured after recovery from first AAP is associated with an increased risk of 10-year mortality as an independent factor. This can be used to detect patients with highest risk after AAP, in order to focus the preventive healthcare actions.