Prevalence and temporal trends of anemia in patients with heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Anemia is an important comorbidity in heart failure (HF), and it is associated with increased adverse disease experience and mortality. Previous reports have focused mainly on HF presenting in healthcare settings. We, therefore, set out to establish the nationwide prevalence and temporal trends of anemia in community-based patients with HF in the US. AIM: To establish the nationwide prevalence and temporal trends of anemia in community-based patients with HF in the US. DESIGN: The NHANES dataset, conducted by the CDC National Center for Health Statistics was used to collect nationally representative data on the health and nutritional status of the non-institutionalized US population. METHODS: We utilized the National Health and Nutrition Examination data collected over five survey cycles (2007-16). Included were participants aged 20-80 years with self-reported diagnosis of HF. Anemia was defined using 2 sex specific cut offs of 13 and 12 g/dl (cutoff 1), and 12 and 11 g/dl (cutoff 2), for men and women, respectively. The Chi square test was used to compare prevalence across different categories and survey cycles. Data analysis was done using STATA 16 with P-values < 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The median hemoglobin in all HF patients was 13.5 g/dl (IQR 12.4-14.5). The prevalence of anemia among community-based patients with HF in the US was 21.34% (cutoff 1) and 9.03% (cutoff 2) and has been stable from 2007 to 2016. The burden of anemia was disproportionately higher in NH Blacks (34.48%, 95% CI 27.12-42.67) and those with BMI < 25 Kg/m2 (17.4%, 95% CI 10.9-26.64). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of anemia in patients with HF in the US is at least 9% and has remained stable over the past decade. This high persistent burden with limited proven interventions should spur further efforts aimed at identifying impactful ways of addressing anemia in patients with HF.

Peripheral arterial disease and abdominal aortic aneurysm in elderly people.

Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are at increased risk for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and mortality from coronary artery disease. Smoking should be stopped and hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and hypothyroidism treated. Statins decrease the incidence of intermittent claudication and improve exercise duration until the onset of intermittent claudication in patients with PAD and hypercholesterolemia. The serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol should be reduced to <70 mg/dL. Antiplatelet drugs such as aspirin or clopidogrel, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and statins should be given to patients with PAD. Beta blockers should be given if coronary artery disease is present. Cilostazol improves exercise time until intermittent claudication. Exercise rehabilitation programs should be used. Revascularization should be performed if indicated. Patients with an infrarenal or juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) measuring 5.5 cm or larger should undergo repair to eliminate the risk of rupture. Patients with an infrarenal or juxtarenal AAA measuring 4.0 to 5.4 cm in diameter should be monitored by ultrasound or computed tomographic scans every 6 to 12 months to detect expansion. Patients with an AAA should undergo intensive risk factor modification, be treated with ACE inhibitors, statins, and beta blockers, and undergo surgery if indicated.

Management of ventricular arrhythmias.

Underlying causes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or complex ventricular arrhythmias (VA) should be treated if possible. Anti-arrhythmic drugs should not be used to treat asymptomatic patients with complex VA and no heart disease. Beta blockers are the only antiarrhythmic drugs that have been documented to reduce mortality in patients with VT or complex VA. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of VT has been beneficial in treating selected patients with arrhythmogenic foci of monomorphic VT. The automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (AICD) is the most effective treatment for patients with life-threatening VT or ventricular fibrillation. The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association class I indications for an AICD are discussed. Other indications for an AICD are discussed. Patients with AICDs should be treated with biventricular pacing, not with dual-chamber rate-responsive pacing at a rate of 70/minute. Patients with AICDs should be treated with beta blockers, statins, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin blockers.

Warfarin use and the risk of valvular calcification.

BACKGROUND: Warfarin affects the synthesis and function of the matrix Gla-protein, a vitamin K-dependent protein, which is a potent inhibitor of tissue calcification. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the incidence of mitral valve calcium (MVC), mitral annular calcium (MAC) and aortic valve calcium (AVC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with warfarin vs. no warfarin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 1155 patients, mean age 74 years, with AF, 725 (63%) were treated with warfarin and 430 (37%) without warfarin. The incidence of MVC, MAC and AVC was investigated in these 1155 patients with two-dimensional echocardiograms. Unadjusted logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the association between the use of warfarin and the incidence of MVC, MAC or AVC. Logistic regression analyses were also conducted to investigate whether the relationship stands after adjustment for confounding risk factors such as age, sex, race, ejection fraction, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease (CAD), glomerular filtration rate, calcium, phosphorus, calcium-phosphorus product, alkaline phosphatase, use of aspirin, beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, and statins. RESULTS: There was a significant association between the use of warfarin and the risk of calcification [unadjusted odds ratio = 1.71, 95% CI = (1.34-2.18)]. The association still stands after adjustment for confounding risk factors. MVC, MAC or AVC was present in 473 of 725 patients (65%) on warfarin vs. 225 of 430 patients (52%) not on warfarin (P < 0.0001). Whether this is a causal relationship remains unknown. CONCLUSIONS: Use of warfarin in patients with AF is associated with an increased prevalence of MVC, MAC or AVC.

Management of atrial fibrillation in the elderly.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with a higher incidence of mortality, stroke, and coronary events than is sinus rhythm. AF with a rapid ventricular rate may cause a tachycardia-related cardiomyopathy. Immediate direct-current (DC) cardioversion should be performed in patients with AF and acute myocardial infarction, chest pain due to myocardial ischemia, hypotension, severe heart failure, or syncope. Intravenous beta blockers, diltiazem, or verapamil may be administered to slow immediately a very rapid ventricular rate in AF. An oral beta blocker, verapamil, or diltiazem should be used in persons with AF if a fast ventricular rate occurs at rest or during exercise despite digoxin. Amiodarone may be used in selected patients with symptomatic life-threatening AF refractory to other drugs. Digoxin should not be used to treat patients with paroxysmal AF. Nondrug therapies should be performed in patients with symptomatic AF in whom a rapid ventricular rate cannot be slowed by drugs. Paroxysmal AF associated with the tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome should be treated with a permanent pacemaker in combination with drugs. A permanent pacemaker should be implanted in patients with AF and symptoms such as dizziness or syncope associated with ventricular pauses greater than 3 seconds which are not drug-induced. Elective DC cardioversion has a higher success rate and a lower incidence of cardiac adverse effects than does medical cardioversion in converting AF to sinus rhythm. Unless transesophageal echocardiography has shown no thrombus in the left atrial appendage before cardioversion, oral warfarin should be given for 3 weeks before elective DC or drug cardioversion of AF and continued for at least 4 weeks after maintenance of sinus rhythm. Many cardiologists prefer, especially in older patients, ventricular rate control plus warfarin rather than maintaining sinus rhythm with antiar-rhythmic drugs. Patients with chronic or paroxysmal AF at high risk for stroke should be treated with long-term warfarin to achieve an International Normalized Ratio of 2.0 to 3.0. Patients with AF at low risk for stroke or with contraindications to warfarin should be treated with aspirin 325 mg daily.

Guidelines and the use of inferior vena cava filters: a review of an institutional experience.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Based on the American College of Chest Physicians 2004 antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma 2002 guidelines, placement of an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter is indicated in patients who either have, or are at high risk for, VTE, but have a contraindication or failure of anticoagulation. Our aim is to compare clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving IVC filters within-guidelines (WG) and outside-of-guidelines (OOG). METHODS: The 558 patients who received an IVC filter were divided into two groups called WG or OOG. The WG group met the criteria described above and the OOG group did not have a contraindication to or a failure of anticoagulation. RESULTS: The WG group had 362 patients and the OOG group had 196 patients. The OOG group had one (0.5%) patient with post-filter pulmonary embolism (PE), two (1%) with IVC thrombosis, and seven (3.6%) with deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The WG group had five (1.4%) patients with post-filter PE, 13 (3.6%) with IVC thrombosis, and 34 (9.4%) with DVT. All patients who developed post-filter PE had a DVT before filter placement, and patients who did not have a prior VTE event were at a significantly lower risk of developing post-filter IVC thrombosis and PE. CONCLUSION: Our data do not support the use of an IVC filter outside of guidelines in patients without prior VTE who can tolerate anticoagulation because of the low risk of developing PE.

Pharmacologic therapy of lipid disorders in the elderly.

Older men and women with coronary artery disease, prior stroke, peripheral arterial disease, and extracranial carotid arterial disease with a serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol > 125 mg/dL despite diet should be treated with lipid-lowering drug therapy, preferably with statins, to reduce the serum LDL cholesterol to < 100 mg/dL. If statin drug therapy does not lower the serum LDL cholesterol to < 100 mg/dL in older persons with coronary artery disease, a bile acid binding resin, such as cholestyramine, should be added, since this drug does not increase the incidence of myositis in persons taking statins. The physician should use statins to treat older persons without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with a serum LDL cholesterol > or = 160 mg/dL plus one major risk factor, or a serum LDL cholesterol greater than or equal to 130 mg/dL plus a serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol < 50 mg/dL. Gemfibrozil may be useful in reducing the incidence of coronary events in persons with coronary artery disease whose primary lipid abnormality is a low serum HDL cholesterol level. There are no good data supporting treatment of hypertriglyceridemia unassociated with increased LDL cholesterol or decreased HDL cholesterol for prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Commentary on treatment of hypertension in the elderly.

The goal of treatment of hypertension in older persons is to lower the blood pressure to <140/90 mm Hg. Older persons with diastolic hypertension should have their diastolic blood pressure lowered to 80 to 85 mm Hg. The blood pressure should be lowered to 130/85 mm Hg in persons with diabetes mellitus or renal insufficiency and to 125/75 mm Hg in persons with proteinuria of 1 gram per 24 hours. Diuretics or beta blockers should be used as initial drugs in the treatment of hypertension. The choice of antihypertensive drug in older persons with associated medical conditions depends on the associated medical conditions.

Cholesterol 2001. Rationale for lipid-lowering in older patients with or without CAD.

Statin treatment of men and women age > or = 50 with coronary artery disease (CAD) and hypercholesterolemia reduces the risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, coronary events, coronary revascularization, stroke, and intermittent claudication. The target serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level is < 100 mg/dL in older patients with CAD, prior stroke, peripheral arterial disease, or extracranial carotid arterial disease and serum LDL cholesterol > 125 mg/dL despite diet therapy. Statins are also effective in reducing cardiovascular events in older persons with hypercholesterolemia but without cardiovascular disease. Consider using statins in patients age 50 to 80 without cardiovascular disease, serum LDL cholesterol > 130 mg/dL, and serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol < 50 mg/dL.

Treatment of the elderly post-myocardial infarction patient.

Coronary risk factors should be modified in older persons after myocardial infarction (MI). Aspirin 160-325 mg daily and beta blockers should be administered indefinitely. Anticoagulants should be administered post-MI to patients unable to tolerate daily aspirin, to those with persistent atrial fibrillation, and to those with left ventricular thrombus. Nitrates, along with beta blockers, should be used to treat angina pectoris. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors should be administered after MI to patients who have congestive heart failure, an anterior MI, or a left ventricular ejection fraction of at or below 40%. There are no class I indications for the use of calcium channel blockers after MI. Complex ventricular arrhythmias should be treated with beta blockers. Persons with life-threatening ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation or who are at very high risk for sudden cardiac death after MI should receive an automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. There are no class I indications for the use of hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women after MI. Indications for coronary revascularization after MI in older individuals are prolongation of life and relief of unacceptable symptoms despite optimal medical management.

Exercise therapy for older persons with cardiovascular disease.

Cardiac rehabilitation with exercise training after myocardial infarction in persons younger than 70 years has been found to cause a significant decrease in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and fatal reinfarction, but no significant difference in nonfatal reinfarction. After myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization in older individuals, such programs significantly improve physical work capacity, body mass index, percent body fat, serum lipids, behavioral characteristics, and quality of life. Exercise modalities should include aerobic, resistance, and flexibility exercises. Less intense exercise of longer duration should be performed by older persons with coronary artery disease. Exercise training programs in patients with congestive heart failure produce significant improvement in peak oxygen consumption, exercise duration, and power output. The benefits of exercise training in patients with congestive heart failure may be due to an increase in cardiac output, an improvement in skeletal muscle metabolism, and an increase in peak blood flow to the exercising limb caused by a reduction in vascular resistance.