Empiric use of cefepime in the treatment of serious urinary tract infections in children.

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common in childhood. They represent a significant proportion (10%) of hospital-acquired infections in children. Bacteria causing UTIs in children vary, depending on the setting (community-acquired vs. nosocomial), underlying anatomic anomalies and concurrent medical conditions. OBJECTIVE: To review published and unpublished clinical studies that have used cefepime for the treatment of UTIs in children. METHODS AND RESULTS: In two recent multicenter, randomized trials, cefepime (50 mg/kg/dose every 8 h and every 12 h) was compared with ceftazidime (50 mg/kg/dose every 8 h) for the treatment of serious urinary tract infections including pyelonephritis in children less than 12 years of age. In these studies a favorable clinical and microbiologic response was observed in >95% of cefepime-treated and ceftazidime-treated children assessed at the end of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that cefepime represents an important therapeutic option for the treatment of serious UTIs in children.

Convalescent phase outpatient parenteral antiinfective therapy for children with complicated appendicitis.

BACKGROUND: Children with a perforated or gangrenous appendix become clinically stable after medical and/or surgical therapy but often remain in the hospital solely to complete parenteral antibiotic therapy. This prospective study investigates the outcomes when children who meet specified criteria are discharged to complete parenteral antibiotic therapy at home. METHODS: Children age 1 to 17 years with appendicitis complicated by generalized peritonitis or intraabdominal abscess were eligible to participate. Subjects whose fever was decreasing, who were able to tolerate oral liquids and for whom further parenteral antibiotic therapy was deemed necessary were discharged from the hospital to receive outpatient parenteral antiinfective therapy (OPAT) with meropenem. Therapy was administered by a family member and supervised by home care nurses. Study personnel visited the home daily to collect data on adverse events, compliance and resource utilization. Pa tients served as their own controls in models of reduced hospitalization and net cost savings. RESULTS: Discharged on average on the fourth postoperative day, 87 children received 4.5 +/- 2.1 days of OPAT. Six (7%) children were subsequently readmitted for complications including bowel obstruction (4 children), intraabdominal abscess (1 child) and pleural effusion (1 child). Another child developed a viral syndrome during OPAT. All other patients recovered uneventfully. Six (7%) children discontinued meropenem prematurely because of rash (4 patients) or diarrhea (2 patients). According to models in which each day of OPAT replaced a day of inpatient care, discharge to OPAT reduced hospitalization by 42 +/- 15% and saved a median of $2908 (10th to 90th percentile range, $1,077 to $4,707) per patient. CONCLUSION: Convalescent phase OPAT is a cost-effective alternative to continued hospitalization for children with complicated appendicitis who are clinically stable yet require further parenteral antibiotic therapy.

Of bugs and drugs. A guide through the labyrinth of antimicrobial therapy for respiratory tract infections.

Choosing appropriate antimicrobial therapy is no longer a simple process. Even for the common problems of respiratory tract disease in children and adults, selection is complicated by both increasing microbial resistance and the daunting number of extended-spectrum antibiotics now on the market. In this article, Drs Singh and Arrieta look at the problem from all aspects and give their specific recommendations.

Vitamin A levels in children with measles in Long Beach, California.

Studies from Africa suggest that vitamin A supplementation may reduce morbidity and mortality rates associated with measles among poorly nourished children. We studied 20 children with measles in Long Beach, Calif., and found that 50% (95% confidence interval; 28% to 72%) were vitamin A deficient. This frequency among presumably well nourished American children supports evaluation of vitamin A status as a part of acute management of measles in the United States.

In vitro activity of teicoplanin compared with vancomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus derived from cystic fibrosis sputum.

We evaluated the in vitro activity of teicoplanin compared with vancomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) derived from cystic fibrosis (CF) sputum. Teicoplanin had a slightly lower median minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for these strains (0.25 micrograms/ml) than did vancomycin (0.5 micrograms/ml). Inoculum size increased the MICs similarly for both drugs, and pH variations did not significantly affect their activity. The presence of serum and sputum in the growth media decreased the activity of both drugs, although this was more pronounced for teicoplanin which is highly protein bound. We conclude that teicoplanin has activity against this pathogen and might be evaluated in clinical protocols designed to address this emerging clinical problem.

In-vitro activity of cefprozil (BMY 28100) and loracarbef (LY 163892) against pathogens obtained from middle ear fluid.

We compared the in-vitro activities of cefprozil, a novel oral cephalosporin, and of loracarbef, a new oral carbacephem, with other agents against middle ear fluid isolates obtained from children with acute otitis media. These included Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Branhamella catarrhalis. Cefprozil activity (MIC50 and MIC90) against S. pneumoniae was 0.25 and 0.50 mg/l; against H. influenzae 8 and 16 mg/l; against B. catarrhalis 2 and 2 mg/l. Loracarbef activity (MIC50 and MIC90) against S. pneumoniae was 1 and 2 mg/l; against H. influenzae 8 and 16 mg/l; against B. catarrhalis 1 and 8 mg/l. Cefprozil was four-fold more active against S. pneumoniae than loracarbef but similar to amoxycillin, amoxycillin/clavulanate, cefaclor, cefixime, cefuroxime and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX). Against H. influenzae, cefprozil was similar to loracarbef and other agents through less active than TMP/SMX and cefixime. Against B. catarrhalis, cefprozil was four-fold more active than loracarbef, cefaclor and cefixime but similar to the comparative antibiotics. Cefprozil and loracarbef activities were unaffected at pH 6 and 8 or in the presence of human serum, but there was a major diminution of activity for both agents at pH 5 and at inoculum sizes greater than or equal to 10(7) cfu/ml. Cefoprozil and loracarbef have consistent activity against middle ear pathogens and further pharmacokinetic and clinical studies appear warranted.