RESUMO
IntroductionFew data exist regarding the immunogenicity of third dose of BNT162b2 relative to second dose in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on different immunosuppressive therapies. We investigated the immunogenicity of BNT162b2 vaccine booster dose in patients with IBD on infliximab combination therapy. MethodsThis is prospective single center observational study conducted between January 1st, 2022 until February 28th, 2022. Patients were recruited at the time of attendance at the infusion center. Eligibility criteria included patients with confirmed diagnosis of IBD who are receiving infliximab with azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine and have received two or three-dose of BNT162b2 vaccine. Patients were excluded if they were infected or had symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 previously since the start of the pandemic or received other vaccines than the BNT162b2. Our primary outcome was the concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies Immunoglobulin G (IgG) and neutralizing antibodies 40-45 weeks from the first dose of BNT162b2 in patients with IBD receiving infliximab combination therapy. Medians with interquartile range (IQR) were calculated. Results162 patients with IBD and receiving infliximab combination therapy were recruited and the number of patients in each group was 81. Median (IQR) SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels were significantly lower after the second dose [125 BAU/mL (43, 192)] compared to patients who received the third booster dose [207 BAU/mL (181, 234)] (p = 0.003). Neutralizing antibody levels were also lower after the second dose [80 BAU/mL (21, 95)] compared to patients who received the third booster dose [96 BAU/mL (93, 99)] (p = <0.001). The percentage of patients who achieved positive SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels in the third (booster) dose group was higher (96.3%) than those in second dose group (90%)(p = 0.026). Percentage of patients who received third (booster) dose and achieved positive SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibody level was 100%, whereas it was lower (88.9%) in patients who received second dose only (p=0.009). ConclusionMost patients with IBD on infliximab combination therapy had positive SARS-CoV-2 IgG and neutralizing antibody concentrations 40-45 weeks post BNT162b2 vaccination. However, SARS-CoV-2 IgG and neutralizing antibody concentrations were lower in patients who received 2 doses only compared to patients who received a third dose.
RESUMO
IntroductionSARS-CoV-2 vaccination has been effective in protecting against severe COVID-19 infections and related mortality. It is recommended for all individuals including patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, safety data is lacking in this group of patients. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the short- and long-term vaccine related adverse events (AEs) in patients with IBD. MethodThis is a prospective, observational cohort study investigating short- and long-term AEs related to BNT162b2 vaccine in patients with IBD (study group) after first and second dose compared to healthy participants (study group). Patients were recruited at the time of attendance to clinic or infusion rooms. Short term (<3 weeks) localized and systemic AEs were assessed via questionnaire. Follow-up phone-based survey was made to collect data on long term (up to 24 weeks) AEs. ResultsA total of 408 patients answered the questionnaires, 204 patients in each group, the study and control group. No serious adverse events were reported in either the study nor the control group after the first or the second dose. Participants in the control group reported more frequent pain at the injection site than those in the study group after the first dose (58 (57%) vs 38 (37%) respectively, P-value= 0.005). After the second dose, tiredness was reported more frequently in the control group [49 (48%)] compared to the study group [25 (24%), (P-value<0.001)]. At 20-24 weeks post vaccination, 386 out of 408 (94.6%) patients were willing to participate in the follow-up phone based questionnaire (196 (96.1%) in the study group vs 190 (93.1%) in the control group). In both groups, none of the patients reported local, systemic or severe adverse events (0 out of 386) at week 20-244 post second dose. ConclusionThe BNT162b2 vaccine is safe in patients with IBD. No severe or long-term adverse events were reported in our study. The frequency of local and systemic adverse events after the second dose was generally higher among healthy participants compared to patients with IBD. Further studies including a larger cohort with longer follow-up duration are needed to assess for possible rare adverse events.
RESUMO
IntroductionImmunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on biologics are not well studied. The goal of this study is to measure serological response to BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines in patients with IBD receiving different biologic therapies. MethodWe performed a multi-center prospective study between August 1st, 2021, and September 15th, 2021. We measured seropositivity of SARS-CoV2 antibodies, SARS-CoV-2 IgG and neutralizing antibody concentrations, in patients with IBD receiving biologic therapies between 4-10 weeks after second dose or 3-6 weeks after first dose of vaccination with BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines. ResultsThere were 126 patients enrolled (mean age, 31 years; 60% male; 71% Crohns disease, 29% ulcerative colitis). 92 patients were vaccinated with BNT162b2 vaccine (73%) and 34 patients with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (27%). The proportion of patients who achieved positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels after receiving 2 doses of the vaccine in patients treated with infliximab and adalimumab were 44 out of 59 patients (74.5%) and 13 out of 16 patients (81.2%), respectively. Whereas the proportion of patients who achieved positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels after receiving two doses of the vaccine in patients treated with ustekinumab and vedolizumab were 100% and 92.8%, respectively. In patients receiving infliximab and adalimumab, the proportion of patients who had positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody levels after two-dose vaccination was 40 out of 59 patients (67.7%) and 14 out 16 patients (87.5%), respectively. Whereas the proportions of patients who had positive anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody levels were 12 out of 13 patients (92.3%) and 13 out of 14 patients (92.8%) in patients receiving ustekinumab and vedolizumab. ConclusionThe majority of patients with IBD on infliximab, adalimumab, and vedolizumab seroconverted after two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. All patients on ustekinumab seroconverted after two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 SARS-CoV-2 are both likely to be effective after two doses in patients with IBD on biologics. A follow up larger studies are needed to evaluate if decay of antibodies occurs over time.
RESUMO
COVID-19 is challenging healthcare preparedness, world economies, and livelihoods. The infection and death rates associated with this pandemic are strikingly variable in different countries. To elucidate this discrepancy, we analyzed 2431 early spread SARS-CoV-2 sequences from GISAID. We estimated continental-wise admixture proportions, assessed haplotype block estimation, and tested for the presence or absence of strains recombination. Herein, we identified 1010 unique missense mutations and seven different SARS-CoV-2 clusters. In samples from Asia, a small haplotype block was identified; whereas, samples from Europe and North America harbored large and different haplotype blocks with nonsynonymous variants. Variant frequency and linkage disequilibrium varied among continents, especially in North America. Recombination between different strains was only observed in North American and European sequences. Additionally, we structurally modeled the two most common mutations D614G and P314L which suggested that these linked mutations may enhance viral entry and stability. Overall, we propose that COVID-19 virulence may be more severe in Europe and North America due to coinfection with different SARS-CoV-2 strains leading to genomic recombination which might be challenging for current treatment regimens and vaccine development. Furthermore, our study provides a possible explanation for the more severe second wave of COVID-19 that many countries are currently experiencing presented as higher rates of infection and death.
RESUMO
The severity of the new COVID-19 pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus is strikingly variable in different global populations. SARS-CoV-2 uses ACE2 as a cell receptor, TMPRSS2 protease, and FURIN peptidase to invade human cells. Here, we investigated 1,378 whole-exome sequences of individuals from the Middle Eastern populations (Kuwait, Qatar, and Iran) to explore natural variations in the ACE2, TMPRSS2, and FURIN genes. We identified two activating variants (K26R and N720D) in the ACE2 gene that are more common in Europeans than in the Middle Eastern, East Asian, and African populations. We postulate that K26R can activate ACE2 and facilitate binding to S-protein RBD while N720D enhances TMPRSS2 cutting and, ultimately, viral entry. We also detected deleterious variants in FURIN that are frequent in the Middle Eastern but not in the European populations. This study highlights specific genetic variations in the ACE2 and FURIN genes that may explain SARS-CoV-2 clinical disparity. We showed structural evidence of the functionality of these activating variants that increase the SARS-CoV-2 aggressiveness. Finally, our data illustrate a significant correlation between ACE2 variants identified in people from Middle Eastern origins that can be further explored to explain the variation in COVID-19 infection and mortality rates globally.
