Relationships of the frailty index and geriatric trauma outcome score with mortality in geriatric trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the relationships of the trauma-specific frailty index (TSFI) and the geriatric trauma out-come score (GTOS) with 30-day mortality among geriatric trauma patients aged 65 and older. METHODS: This prospective observational study included 382 patients aged 65 years and older who were admitted to a training and research hospital due to blunt trauma. Informed consent was obtained from them and/or their relatives. In addition to patients' vital signs, information about chronic diseases and drug use was obtained on admission to the emergency service and the results of labo-ratory examinations, radiological imaging, blood replacements, length of stay in the emergency room and hospital, and mortality were recorded in case forms. Glasgow coma scale, injury severity score, GTOS, TSFI, and body mass index (BMI) values were calculated by the researchers. Outcome information was obtained from the patient and/or relatives by phone 30 days later. RESULTS: When the patients who died and those who survived were compared at the 30th day after trauma, no significant difference was found in terms of BMI or TSFI (p>0.05). It was determined that patients with a GTOS of ≥95 at admission would have higher 30-day mortality (the sensitivity was 76%, and the specificity was 72.27% (p<0.001)). When correlations were evaluated according to mortality, a correlation was found between the presence of two or more comorbid diseases and mortality (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: We think that a more reliable frailty score can be obtained using these parameters as we have determined that the TSFI as calculated at admission to the emergency department is not sufficient on its own, while the lactate, GTOS, and the length of hospital stay are also effective in mortality. We suggest that it would be appropriate to use the GTOS in long-term follow-up as well as for predictive power for mortality within 24 h.

COVID-19 outbreak impact on emergency trauma visits and trauma surgery in a level 3 trauma center.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare emergency trauma visits' severity, emergency surgical needs, and characteristics between the pandemic and pre-pandemic periods. METHODS: This retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary training and research hospital between 1 and 30 April 2020 (pandemic group) and compared with the previous year's same dates (pre-pandemic group). Trauma patients aged 18 and over were included in the study. Emergency Severity Index (ESI) levels, trauma surgery needs, and injury characteristics were compared. RESULTS: A total of 2097 patients (592 pandemic and 1505 pre-pandemic) were included. There was an approximately 60% reduction in total and daily visits. ESI levels 1 (0.2% vs. 1.4%) and 2 (0.8% vs. 1.9%) patients increased during pandemic period. Trauma surgery needs (1.6% vs. 2.2%), intensive care unit (ICU) admission (0.4% vs. 0.2%), and ward admission (6.3% vs. 7.9%) did not change during pandemic period. CONCLUSION: Despite the decrease in the visit frequency of adult trauma patients during the pandemic period, the needs for trauma surgery, ICU, and ward admission did not change. Trauma teams should continue their duties during the pandemic period.