Postpartum suppression of ovarian activity with a Deslorelin implant enhanced uterine involution in lactating dairy cows.

Holstein cows received, subcutaneously a non-degradable implant containing 5mg of the GnRH agonist Deslorelin (DESL) or no implant (CON) at 2+/-1 days postpartum (dpp). All cows were injected with PGF(2alpha) at 9 dpp. Previous pregnant (PPH) and non-pregnant uterine horns (PNPH) were determined by palpation per rectum. In Experiment 1, cows [DESL implant (n=10) and CON (n=9)] were examined by ultrasonography to record ovarian structures (23, 30 and 37 dpp) and uterine horn and cervical diameters (16, 23, 30 and 37 dpp). Uterine tone was scored before ultrasonography. Vaginoscopy was conducted just after ultrasonography examination to assess cervical discharge and color of the external cervical os. Blood samples were collected on a weekly basis for hormonal analyses. In Experiment 2, cows [DESL implant (n=77) and CON (n=70)] were palpated per rectum and vaginoscopy at 30 dpp for scoring of uterine tone, uterine horns, cervical diameter, and discharge. Blood samples were collected only at 9 dpp. In Experiment 1, DESL-implant-treated cows had more Class 1 follicles (P<0.01), less Class 2 (P<0.01) and Class 3 follicles (P<0.01) and no corpus luteum (CL) formation (P<0.01). In CON cows, six of nine animals had visible CL at 25+/-7 dpp. At 9 dpp plasma concentration of E(2), P(4) (P<0.01) and PGFM (P<0.05) were less in the DESL-implant treatment group. Diameter of PPH (P<0.01), PNPH (P<0.01) and cervix (P=0.08) were less in the DESL-implant treatment associated with greater uterine tone (P=0.07). The DESL-implant cows had a greater frequency of clear cervical discharge (P=0.09) and pink cervical os (P=0.06). In Experiment 2, plasma concentrations of PGFM were less at 9 dpp in DESL-implant treatment (P<0.01). Diameters of the PPH (P<0.01) and PNPH (P<0.01) were less and more uterine tone (P<0.01) in the DESL-implant treatment. Diameter of cervix and frequency of a cervical discharge score did not differ between treatments. Treatment with non-degradable Deslorelin (5mg) implant during postpartum: (1) suppressed ovarian follicular development, (2) enhanced physical involution of the uterus and cervix, (3) increased tone of the uterine wall, (4) decreased frequency of purulent cervical discharges, and (5) reduced inflammatory processes of the reproductive tract.

Reproductive responses following postpartum suppression of ovarian follicular development with a deslorelin implant during summer heat stress in lactating dairy cows.

The objective was to evaluate pregnancy rate to a timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocol in the autumn for cows treated with a non-degradable GnRH agonist implant (Deslorelin [DESL], 5mg) during the summer heat stress period compared with non-treated controls (CON). Cows were randomly assigned to receive or not a DESL implant within 1-4 days postpartum (dpp) twice weekly, from 25 June through 8 August 2001. All cows in DESL implant and CON treatments were injected with PGF(2alpha) 7 days after enrollment. Ultrasonography (US) monitored numbers of ovarian follicles and corpus luteum (CL) at approximately 10, 30, 35/36, 45/44, 56/55 and 66/63dpp, while DESL implants were in situ and concurrently CON, respectively. DESL implants were removed at two specific days, 28 August and 4 September. Cows had DESL implant in situ for a range of 28-67 days, depending on date of enrollment and implant removal. Within 61-100dpp, 31 days after implant removal, DESL implant and CON cows were initiated in a Presynch-Ovsynch and TAI protocol. Pregnancy was evaluated by US and palpation per rectum at 28 and 46 days after TAI, respectively. Plasma concentrations of progesterone were analyzed for sets of blood samples collected during the Presynch-Ovsynch and at TAI day followed 8 days later. Cows in the DESL-implant treatment had more (P<0.01) Class 1 (3-5mm) follicles, less (P<0.01) Class 2 (6-9mm), Class 3 (> or =10mm) follicles and CL compared with CON cows. Proportion of cows having initiated estrous cycles after calving was less (P<0.01) in the DESL-implant treatment (52.2%, 58/111) compared with CON (93.7%, 104/111) at the beginning of Ovsynch. Pregnancy rate to TAI was less (P<0.01) in the DESL implant (27.5%, 33/120) compared with CON (53.9%, 69/128). Pregnancy rate to TAI was less (P<0.01) in DESL-implanted cows that had initiated estrous cycles after calving (30.6%, 19/62) compared with CON (53.7%, 65/121) cows having initiated estrous cycles after calving. Furthermore, pregnancy rate was less (P<0.01) for cows having ovulations that had initiated estrous cycles after TAI in the DESL implant (39.1%, 18/46) compared with CON (62.1%, 54/87) treatments. Pregnancy losses from day 28 to day 46 of pregnancy did not differ between DESL implant (15.1%, 5/33) and CON (13.0%, 9/69) treatments. The DESL implant induced a delay in initiation of a new wave of follicular development during the postpartum-heat stressed period. The lesser pregnancy rate in the DESL-implant treatment group may be due to a pool of heat stress damaged follicles that were depleted in the control group with re-occurring follicle waves.

The use of a deslorelin implant (GnRH agonist) during the late embryonic period to reduce pregnancy loss.

Embryonic and fetal mortality reduce reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows. The objectives of this study were to reduce pregnancy loss by administering a deslorelin implant (GnRH agonist) during the late embryonic period, to reduce follicular growth, induce accessory corpora lutea, and increase plasma progesterone concentrations. Lactating dairy cows received an implant containing 2.1 mg of deslorelin (Deslorelin group; n = 89) or no treatment (Control group; n = 92) on Day 27 of pregnancy. Pregnancy, ovarian structures and plasma progesterone concentrations were determined on Days 27 and 45, and pregnancy was re-confirmed on Day 90. On Day 45, mean +/- S.E.M. numbers of class 2 (6-9 mm; 0.72+/-0.19) and class 3 (> or = 10 mm; 0.86 +/- 0.12) follicles for cows in the Deslorelin group were lower (P < 0.01) than the numbers of class 2 (1.90 +/- 0.18) and class 3 (1.92 +/- 0.12) follicles for cows in the Control group. On Day 45, the number of accessory corpora lutea for cows in the Deslorelin group (1.80 +/- 0.07) were greater (P < 0.01) than for cows in the Control group (1.31 +/- 0.07). On Day 45, plasma progesterone concentration was increased (P < 0.01) for cows in the Deslorelin group (8.03 +/- 0.33 ng/mL) compared to cows in the Control group (6.40 +/- 0.31 ng/mL). Pregnancy losses did not differ between Days 27 and 45 and Days 45 and 90 for cows in the Control (15.2 and 11.0%, respectively) and Deslorelin groups (20.2 and 10.5%, respectively). However, in the Deslorelin group, pregnancy loss between Days 45 and 90 was lower (P < 0.05) for cows that formed an accessory CL (0%) compared to cows that did not form an accessory CL (16.1%).

Resynchronization of ovulation and timed insemination in lactating dairy cows I: use of the Ovsynch and Heatsynch protocols after non-pregnancy diagnosis by ultrasonography.

The objective was to compare pregnancy rates and pregnancy losses in lactating dairy cows that were diagnosed not pregnant and re-inseminated following either the Ovsynch or Heatsynch protocols. Also evaluated were the effects of stages of the estrous cycle, ovarian cysts and anestrus on pregnancy rates for both treatments. Non-pregnant cows (n = 332) as determined by ultrasonography on day 27 post-AI (study day 0) were divided into two groups. Cows in the Ovsynch group (n = 166) received GnRH on day 0, PGF2alpha on day 7, GnRH on day 9, and timed AI (TAI) 16 h later (day 10). Cows in the Heatsynch group (n = 166) received GnRH on day 0, PGF2alpha on day 7, estradiol cypionate (ECP) on day 8, and TAI 48 h later (day 10). Cows detected in estrus on days 8 and 9 were inseminated and included in the study. On day 0, cows were classified according to different stages of the estrous cycle, or presence of ovarian cysts or anestrus. Pregnancy rates were evaluated 27, 45 and 90 days after resynchronized AI. Overall, there was no difference in pregnancy rates on days 27, 45 and 90 between cows in the Ovsynch (25.2, 17.5, and 13.9%) and Heatsynch (25.8, 19.9, and 16.1%) groups. There was no difference in pregnancy losses from days 27 to 45 and days 45 to 90 for cows in the Ovsynch (25.0 and 17.9%) and Heatsynch (14.7 and 10.3%) groups. However, pregnancy rates were increased when cows in metestrus were subjected to the Heatsynch protocol and cows with ovarian cysts were subjected to the Ovsynch protocol.

Resynchronization of ovulation and timed insemination in lactating dairy cows, II: assigning protocols according to stages of the estrous cycle, or presence of ovarian cysts or anestrus.

Pregnancy rates were compared in lactating dairy cows (n = 1083) assigned to protocols for resynchronization of ovulation based on stages of the estrous cycle, or presence of ovarian cysts or anestrus. Cows were detected not pregnant by ultrasonography 30 d after a previous AI (study day 0) and classified as diestrus, metestrus, proestrus, with ovarian cysts or anestrus. Cows in diestrus (January-May) were assigned to either Ovsynch (GnRH day 0, PGF2alpha day 7, GnRH day 9, and timed-AI [TAI] 16 h later; n = 96), or Quicksynch (PGF2alpha day 0, estradiol cypionate [ECP] day 1, AI at detected estrus [AIDE] on day 2, or TAI on day 3; n = 96). Cows in diestrus (June-December) were assigned to either Ovsynch (n = 156) or Modified Quicksynch (PGF2alpha day 0, ECP day 1, AIDE days 2 and 3, and to Ovsynch on day 4 if not detected in estrus; n = 142). Cows in metestrus were assigned either to Ovsynch (n = 68), Heatsynch (GnRH day 0, PGF2alpha day 7, ECP day 8, AIDE day 9, or TAI day 10; n = 62), or GnRH + Ovsynch (GnRH on day 0, followed by Ovsynch on day 8; n = 64). Cows in proestrus, with ovarian cysts, or anestrus were assigned to either Ovsynch (proestrus n = 89, ovarian cysts n = 97, anestrus n = 8) or GnRH + Ovsynch (proestrus n = 87, ovarian cysts n = 109, anestrus n = 9). Pregnancy rate was evaluated 30, 55 and 90 d after resynchronized AI. For cows in diestrus (January-May), pregnancy rates were higher for Ovsynch (35.9, 29.2 and 26.0%) than for Quicksynch (21.7, 16.7 and 15.6%). For cows in diestrus (June-December), pregnancy rates were similar for Ovsynch (34.4, 24.0 and 23.6%) and Modified Quicksynch (27.1, 26.2 and 21.6%). For cows in metestrus, pregnancy rates were higher for GnRH + Ovsynch (33.3, 24.5 and 20.3%) than for Heatsynch (20.3, 12.9 and 9.8%). For cows with ovarian cysts, pregnancy rates were higher for GnRH + Ovsynch (30.3, 26.6 and 22.9%) than for Ovsynch (20.2, 18.5 and 14.7%). Assignment to resynchronization protocols based on the stages of the estrous cycle, or presence of ovarian cysts improved pregnancy rates.

Strategic use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) to increase pregnancy rate and reduce pregnancy loss in lactating dairy cows subjected to synchronization of ovulation and timed insemination.

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of GnRH (100 microg i.m.) treatment 5 and 15 days after timed insemination (TAI) on pregnancy rate and pregnancy loss in lactating dairy cows subjected to synchronization of ovulation. The study included 831 lactating dairy cows subjected to a Presynch-Ovsynch protocol for first service. On the day of TAI (Day 0), cows were randomly assigned to one of four experimental groups. Cows in Group 1 (n = 214) were treated with GnRH on Day 5; cows in Group 2 (n = 209) were treated with GnRH on Day 15; cows in Group 3 (n = 212) were treated with GnRH on both Day 5 and Day 15; cows in Group 4 (n = 196) were not treated. Pregnancy rate was evaluated at Day 27 and Day 45 after TAI. The interestrus interval and the proportion of cows diagnosed not pregnant based on expression of estrus and insemination before pregnancy diagnosis on Day 27 were determined. The results of this study are: (1) GnRH treatment on Day 5 or Day 15 did not increase pregnancy rate, or reduce pregnancy loss between Day 27 and Day 55 after TAI; (2) cows treated with GnRH on both Day 5 and Day 15 had a lower (P < 0.01) proportion of cows diagnosed not pregnant based on expression of estrus before ultrasonography on Day 27 (26.5%) compared to control cows (52.9%), and these cows had an extended (P = 0.05) interestrus interval (23.4 days vs. 21.5 days); and (3) GnRH treatment on both Day 5 and Day 15 after TAI reduced pregnancy rate on Day 27 (36.8% vs. 44.4% for control cows; P < 0.03) and Day 55 (28.3% vs. 36.2% for control cows; P < 0.01). Therefore, strategies to stimulate CL function using multiple doses of GnRH during the luteal phase need to consider potential negative effects.

Induction of ovulation in nonlactating dairy cows and heifers using different doses of a deslorelin implant.

The objective of this study was to evaluate ovarian function after inducing ovulation with a deslorelin implant in nonlactating dairy cows and heifers. Cattle received GnRH on Day -9, and PGF2alpha on Day -2. On Day 0, in Experiment 1, cows received either 100 microg GnRH (Control), a 750 microg (DESLORELIN 750) or 1000 microg (DESLORELIN 1000) deslorelin implant. On Day 0, in Experiment 2, cows received 100 microg of GnRH or a 450 microg (DESLORELIN 450) deslorelin implant. In Experiments 1 and 2, cows received PGF2alpha on Day 16. Ultrasonography and blood sampling for plasma progesterone (P4) were used to monitor ovarian activity. On Day 0, in Experiment 3, heifers received either 100 microg of GnRH or 750 microg (DESLORELIN 750) deslorelin implant. On Day 16, all heifers received PGF2alpha. Blood samples were collected on Days 7, 13 and 16. In Experiments 1-3, deslorelin implants did not elevate plasma concentrations of P4 in a systematic manner during the late luteal phase. In Experiments 1 and 2, deslorelin implants decreased the size of the largest follicle and the number of Class II and III follicles. In Experiments 1 and 2, deslorelin-treated cows failed to ovulate by Day 28. In conclusion, deslorelin implants induced ovulation, stimulated development of a normal CL, and delayed follicular growth during the subsequent diestrus period. For future applications, the dose of the deslorelin implant will have to be adjusted, and if used for timed-inseminations, nonpregnant cows will have to be resynchronized to minimize delayed returns to estrus and ovulation.