RESUMO
There has been a growing consensus in recent years that development is a multidimensional concept that embodies the enhancement of several aspects of human life and, as a result, it is too complex to be captured by single indices. Composite Indicators have increasingly been recognised as useful tools in the measurement of this concept. In the absence of rigorous and comprehensive empirical studies in Greece on this topic, the paper assesses and reveals the developmental transformations of the regional economies at NUTS 2 and 3 levels in the period 1991-2011. In this way, this study provides a more comprehensive and integrative perspective of regional development in Greece presenting empirical evidence not only from a country with large and persistent regional inequalities but also from a cohesion country of the European Union for which regional policy has been of critical importance in the last decades. Moreover, the study adds to the literature shedding light on an under-researched topic; the importance of spatial heterogeneity in the construction of Composite Indicators. The results reveal a heterogeneous regional pattern of development for the Greek case. The findings can be used by policymakers as a way to better understand and improve the regional development process.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The opioid epidemic is an escalating health crisis. We evaluated the impact of opioid prescription rates and socioeconomic determinants on opioid mortality rates, and identified potential differences in prescription patterns by categories of practitioners. METHODS: We combined the 2013 and 2014 Medicare Part D data and quantified the opioid prescription rate in a county level cross-sectional study with data from 2710 counties, 468,614 unique prescribers and 46,665,037 beneficiaries. We used the CDC WONDER database to obtain opioid-related mortality data. Socioeconomic characteristics for each county were acquired from the US Census Bureau. RESULTS: The average national opioid prescription rate was 3.86 claims per beneficiary that received a prescription for opioids (95% CI 3.86-3.86). At a county level, overall opioid prescription rates (p < 0.001, Coeff = 0.27) and especially those provided by emergency medicine (p < 0.001, Coeff = 0.21), family medicine physicians (p = 0.11, Coeff = 0.008), internal medicine (p = 0.018, Coeff = 0.1) and physician assistants (p = 0.021, Coeff = 0.08) were associated with opioid-related mortality. Demographic factors, such as proportion of white (p white < 0.001, Coeff = 0.22), black (p black < 0.001, Coeff = - 0.19) and male population (p male < 0.001, Coeff = 0.13) were associated with opioid prescription rates, while poverty (p < 0.001, Coeff = 0.41) and proportion of white population (p white < 0.001, Coeff = 0.27) were risk factors for opioid-related mortality (p model < 0.001, R 2 = 0.35). Notably, the impact of prescribers in the upper quartile was associated with opioid mortality (p < 0.001, Coeff = 0.14) and was twice that of the remaining 75% of prescribers together (p < 0.001, Coeff = 0.07) (p model = 0.03, R 2 = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The prescription opioid rate, and especially that by certain categories of prescribers, correlated with opioid-related mortality. Interventions should prioritize providers that have a disproportionate impact and those that care for populations with socioeconomic factors that place them at higher risk.
