A Randomized Trial Comparing Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession versus Unilateral Recess and Resect for Basic-Type Intermittent Exotropia.

PURPOSE: To compare long-term outcomes after bilateral lateral rectus recession (BLRc) or unilateral lateral rectus recession combined with medial rectus resection in the same eye (R&R) for primary treatment of childhood intermittent exotropia (IXT). DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred ninety-seven children 3 to younger than 11 years of age with basic-type IXT, a largest deviation by prism and alternate cover test at any distance of 15 to 40 prism diopters (PD), and near stereoacuity of at least 400 seconds of arc. METHODS: Random assignment to BLRc or R&R and masked examinations conducted every 6 months after surgery for 3 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of participants meeting suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years, defined as: (1) exotropia of 10 PD or more at distance or near using simultaneous prism and cover test (SPCT); or (2) constant esotropia of 6 PD or more at distance or near using SPCT; (3) loss of 2 octaves or more of stereoacuity from baseline, at any masked examination; or (4) reoperation without meeting any of these criteria. RESULTS: Cumulative probability of suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years was 46% (43/101) in the BLRc group versus 37% (33/96) in the R&R group (treatment group difference of BLRc minus R&R, 9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6% to 23%). Reoperation by 3 years occurred in 9 participants (10%) in the BLRc group (8 of 9 met suboptimal surgical outcome criteria) and in 4 participants (5%) in the R&R group (3 of 4 met suboptimal surgical outcome criteria; treatment group difference of BLRc minus R&R, 5%; 95% CI, -2% to 13%). Among participants completing the 3-year visit, 29% (25 of 86) in the BLRc group and 17% (13 of 77) in the R&R group underwent reoperation or met suboptimal surgical outcome criteria at 3 years (treatment group difference of BLRc minus R&R, 12%; 95% CI, -1% to 25%). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find a statistically significant difference in suboptimal surgical outcome by 3 years between children with IXT treated with BLRc compared with those treated with R&R. Based on these findings, we are unable to recommend one surgical approach over the other for childhood IXT.

Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive on a polyglactin scaffold in strabismus surgery: a laboratory study.

BACKGROUND: The use of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives in strabismus surgery has been variously successful, depending primarily on achieving adequate bond strength and minimizing extraocular muscle slippage. We investigate a novel approach to this problem, involving cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive on a polyglactin 910 scaffold as a means to secure extraocular muscle to the sclera for strabismus surgery. METHODS: In this experimental laboratory study, butyl-cyanoacrylate was used to fix a polyglactin 910 scaffold to the sclera of cadaver eyes. After allowing for polymerization, a force was applied to the mesh until the polyglactin-sclera bond failed. The maximum load (g) required for bond failure was recorded. The effects of surface area of the polyglactin 910 mesh as well as time required for cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive polymerization on bond strength were investigated. RESULTS: All combination of variables tested, except for experiments involving polyglactin 910 mesh that is 30 mm(2) with a polymerization time of 15 seconds or 30 seconds and polyglactin 910 mesh that is 40 mm(2) with a polymerization time of 15 seconds, achieved a bond strength that was significantly greater than those forces seen in a physiologic setting (P > 0.05). Increasing area or time resulted in increasing bond strength. Area and time were found to be independent variables. CONCLUSIONS: The cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive-derived polyglactin-sclera bond achieved a maximum load greater than those seen in a physiologic setting. Our novel approach demonstrates a clinically feasible alternative to traditional means for bonding muscle to sclera in strabismus surgery.

The effect of neutral density filters on testing in patients with strabismic amblyopia.

OBJECTIVE: To confirm if using a neutral density filter (NDF) affects eyes with strabismic amblyopia differently compared to fellow non-amblyopic eyes, and to determine if a similar effect could be observed when using a NDF during peripheral visual field testing. DESIGN: Prospective controlled case series. PARTICIPANTS: 19 subjects with strabismic amblyopia with visual acuities between 20/400 and 20/40 in their affected eyes were recruited to the study. Fellow non-amblyopic eyes served as the control group. METHODS: Visual acuity in both eyes was assessed using a projected Snellen eye chart with two NDFs (0.4 and 3.0 densities). Visual fields were assessed using a Humphrey perimeter using one NDF (0.4 density). Best corrected visual acuity and visual fields were also recorded. RESULTS: When using a 3.0 NDF, visual acuity was reduced in all eyes (p < 0.0001). When using a 0.4 NDF, visual acuity was significantly improved in eyes with strabismic amblyopia compared to unfiltered conditions (p = 0.0011). There was no significant effect by NDFs on visual field testing in eyes with strabismic amblyopia or fellow non-amblyopic eyes. CONCLUSIONS: Neutral density filters affect eyes with strabismic amblyopia differently than they do non-amblyopic eyes. A significant improvement in visual acuity of eyes with strabismic amblyopia was observed when using a 0.4 NDF compared to non-amblyopic eyes. Visual acuity was reduced in amblyopic as well as non-amblyopic eyes when viewing through a 3.0 NDF. No significant change in visual fields was observed when using a 0.4 NDF in amblyopic or non-amblyopic eyes.

The role of Frizzled-4 mutations in familial exudative vitreoretinopathy and Coats disease.

AIM: The aim of this study is to assess the role of Frizzled-4 (FZD4) in familial exudative vitreoretinopathy (FEVR) and Coats disease. METHODS: Tissue samples were collected for DNA extraction and automated DNA sequencing of the two coding exons of FZD4 in both directions. Cases carrying a FZD4 mutation and demonstrating extreme disease severity were selected for direct automated sequencing of all coding exons of LRP5, NDP and TSPAN12. Clinical data were obtained for the purpose of identifying genotype-phenotype correlations. RESULTS: 68 probands were diagnosed as having autosomal dominant or sporadic FEVR. Eleven FZD4 mutations (five missense, three deletions, one insertion, two nonsense) were identified. Six of these mutations are novel, and none were found in 346 control chromosomes. In 16 cases of Coats disease, one polymorphism combination was found in two samples: no mutations were detected. No genotype-phenotype correlation emerged. Three severely affected cases with FZD4 mutations failed to show additional mutations in the three other FEVR genes. CONCLUSION: The authors identified 12 FEVR probands with FZD4 mutations. FZD4 mutation screening can be a useful tool especially in mild or atypical cases of FEVR. Germ-line mutations in FZD4 do not appear to be a common cause of Coats disease.

Relationship between feeding schedules and gastric distress during retinopathy of prematurity screening eye examinations.

PURPOSE: To determine whether a relationship exists between the timing of feeding before retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) eye examinations and gastric side effects or distress associated with this examination. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, single-masked study was conducted involving infants in the neonatal intensive care unit who required an ROP eye examination and who received normal or full enteral feeding over a 1 year period. Infants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 study arms: feeding 1 hour before examination (arm 1) or feeding schedule adjusted to ensure no feeding within 2 hours before examination (arm 2). Physiological data, including blood pressure and pulse rate, before, during and after examination, crying time during the examination, presence of vomiting and gastric aspirates, and gastric aspirates volume 24 hours after the examination, were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 34 infants were enrolled, with 57 separate eye examinations conducted. There was 19% less crying (p = 0.016) in arm 1 versus arm 2. Vomiting was 3-fold less in arm 1 versus arm 2 (4.2% vs 12.5%, p = 0.38). Gastric aspirates was less in arm 1 versus arm 2 (p = 0.18). Diastolic blood pressure was lower and respiratory rate greater during the examination in arm 1 (p < 0.05), whereas pulse rate was greater at the start of the examination in arm 1 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Feeding neonatal intensive care unit infants 1 hour before compared with withholding feeding 2 or more hours before ROP examinations may reduce stress during the examination, as measured by percentage crying during the examination, with no increased incidence of vomiting or gastric aspirates.

Field testing of the plusoptiX S04 photoscreener.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the plusoptiX S04 digital photoscreener in a school screening program. METHODS: Between 2006 and 2007, 1343 information pamphlets/consent forms were sent to all junior kindergarten students in a local school district. Assistants from a local public health unit photographed 307 children. Of these, 271 children received an independent ophthalmic examination by a physician. Photographic results were compared with the those of the ophthalmic examination. Amblyopia risk factors were defined as anisometropia >1 D (sphere or cylinder), astigmatism >1.25 D, myopia >3 D, hyperopia >3.5 D, any manifest strabismus, and any media opacity. RESULTS: Photographic and examination results agreed in 94% of cases. Sensitivity in detecting amblyopia risk factors was 83%; specificity was 95%. The positive and negative predictive values were 73% and 97%, respectively. The untestable/unusable rate was 1%. CONCLUSIONS: These results compare favorably with a previously reported (but no longer available) digital photoscreening camera and are superior to results obtained with other off-axis photoscreening devices that require human interpretation. On the basis of these results, in a real-world screening program, the camera would falsely refer 4% of those screened and would fail to correctly refer 2%. The accuracy of the plusoptiX S04 camera in detecting amblyopia risk factors appears sufficiently high to consider its further deployment in a widespread school screening program.