Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Injury ; 52(7): 1925-1933, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33902868

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Electrical burn injuries are devastating and cause not only loss of life but also severe disabilities in the form of limb loss. Increase in urbanization, industrialization and overcrowding has led to an increase in electric injuries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was prospective in nature evaluating electric burns and studied the pattern of limb loss for a duration of 18 months from October 2016 to March 2018. Parameters recorded were demographic data, clinical data regarding the electrical injuries, complications, and outcomes. RESULTS: Male patients made up 85.3% of cases. Mean TBSA was 24.76 ± 19.18%. Mean age was 27.59 ± 13.73 years. Pediatric patients made up 17%. High voltage burns constituted 68.2 %. Electric contact burn was the most common type making up 49.5% of cases. The most common cause was occupational (38.9%). A fasciotomy was required in 22% of cases with an amputation rate of 38% (209 out of 550). There were 190 major amputations and 106 minor amputations. Overall, the right upper limb amputations were twice as common as the left. The ratio of upper limb: lower limb amputation was 4:1. Fifty patients (23.9%) required revision amputation. The age group 11 to 30 years made up 55.5% of amputations. There was no statistical difference in amputation rates between males (31.31%) and females (41.97%). In patients with TBSA less than 25% amputation rate was 47.77% as compared to patients with more than 25% TBSA, 19.47% (p<0.001). Most amputations occurred due to electric contact burns (74.16%). In the high voltage group, 46.1% underwent amputation vs low voltage group -20.6% (p<0.001). Overall mortality rate was 12.7%. Three hundred patients (55%) had low level of awareness regarding consequences of electric injury. Thirty one percent had medium level of awareness and only 14 % had high level of awareness. There was a significant correlation between education level and awareness in adult patients (p<0.001). Seventy percent of persons with occupational injuries used only footwear and no other protective equipment. CONCLUSION: Increasing public awareness, safety measures at workplaces are measures that will help reducing electrical burns which reduce limb and life loss.


Assuntos
Queimaduras por Corrente Elétrica , Queimaduras , Traumatismos Ocupacionais , Adolescente , Adulto , Amputação Cirúrgica , Queimaduras por Corrente Elétrica/epidemiologia , Queimaduras por Corrente Elétrica/cirurgia , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Traumatismos Ocupacionais/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Burn Care Res ; 42(4): 794-800, 2021 08 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33367625

RESUMO

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought with it many challenges in the field of healthcare around the world. Managing burn patients has its own challenges as they require a long duration of care and are more susceptible to infection. We conducted a retrospective observational study from January 30 to July 15, 2020 at our center to study the epidemiology of burns treated & patients and healthcare workers affected by COVID-19 during this period. The number of burn admissions showed a 42.6% reduction as compared to last year. A total of 17 patients (3.67%) and 29 health care workers (8.68%) tested positive for COVID-19 in the burns department. Our strategy underwent changes based on the changing dynamics of COVID-19 and changes in government and institutional policies. We have described the various challenges we faced in managing burns during this time. We found that effective screening of patients and healthcare workers, proper segregation of negative and positive/ suspect population and a low threshold for COVID-19 testing were essential to mitigate transmission of infection.


Assuntos
Unidades de Queimados/organização & administração , Queimaduras/terapia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Queimaduras/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Humanos , Índia , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
J Burn Care Res ; 42(3): 538-544, 2021 05 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33161435

RESUMO

Fasciotomy is indicated to relieve compartment syndrome caused by electric burns. Many techniques are available to close the fasciotomy wounds including vacuum-assisted closure, skin grafting, and healing by secondary intention. This study assessed the shoelace technique in fasciotomy wound closure in patients with electric burns. The study included 19 fasciotomy wounds that were treated by shoelace technique (Group ST, n = 10 fasciotomy wounds) or by skin grafting/healing by secondary intention (Group C, n = 9 fasciotomy wounds). Data were collected for wound surface area, time to intervention, time to wound closure, rate of decrease in wound surface area after application of shoelace technique and associated complications. The mean time to intervention after fasciotomy was significantly lower in Group ST-7.6 ± 3.8 days as compared to 15.8 ± 5.3 days in Group C (P = .004). The median time to closure was also significantly lower in Group ST-7 days (range 6-10) as compared to Group C-20 days (range 12-48) (P < .001). Primary closure was achieved in 80% cases in the group ST and no complications were recorded. The shoelace technique is an economical, fast, and effective method of fasciotomy wound closure in electric burns, especially in high volume centers and resource-limited areas.


Assuntos
Queimaduras por Corrente Elétrica/cirurgia , Fasciotomia , Técnicas de Fechamento de Ferimentos , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Síndromes Compartimentais/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Transplante de Pele
4.
J Burn Care Res ; 42(3): 473-480, 2021 05 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33095880

RESUMO

The American Burn Association/Shriners Hospitals for Children Burn Outcomes Questionnaire (BOQ) is burn-specific quality of life assessment questionnaire for children. In this study, we modified the questionnaire to suit the Indian population and also translated it to Hindi. Three questions were modified according to its Indian context. One new question was added to the "Transfers and mobility" domain; a new domain "Economic impact" with two questions was added to study the economic impact on families. Twenty-five patients of age 5 to 18 years were included in the study. The Indian adaptation of Burn Outcome Questionnaire-Hindi Version 5 to 18 years (I-BOQ-HV 5-18 years) was found to be feasible in the Indian population. The internal consistency of the modified scale was good with all except one domain with Cronbach's alpha greater than 0.7. Test-retest reliability was done with intraclass correlation which was good, with values of greater than 0.7 for all domains. Pearson's correlation coefficient showed good discriminant validity between the domains. Factor analysis using principle component analysis with orthogonal rotation resulted in 10 of the 12 components with good factor loadings. The I-BOQ-HV 5 to 18 years has been shown to reliably predict quality of life of children with burns in India.


Assuntos
Queimaduras/psicologia , Queimaduras/terapia , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Índia , Masculino , Psicometria , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Traduções
5.
Burns ; 46(5): 1060-1065, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32081382

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Burns are a worldwide problem with majority of them occurring in low and middle-income countries. The hurdles in treatment of burns in the resource restricted setting are unique and challenging. The role of intravenous antibiotics in reducing mortality and morbidity related to infection and sepsis has not been studied extensively in the Indian sub-continent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted at a tertiary burn care center in India over a period of six months with follow up of one month from the day of burn injury. RESULTS: Data from a total of 157 patients were collected and analysed. In Prophylaxis group (n = 77), sepsis was detected in 33 patients and 38 patients expired. In No Prophylaxis group (n = 80), sepsis was detected in 37 patients and 40 patients expired. In Inhalational burns subgroup, patients belonging to Prophylaxis group (n = 30) had 20 patients diagnosed with pneumonia while 22 patients did not survive till 30th post burn day. Patients in No Prophylaxis group who had inhalational burns were 38 in number. Pneumonia was diagnosed in 29 of them while 27 did not survive till 30th post burn day. In Pneumonia subgroup, patients belonging to Prophylaxis group had lower mortality rate as compared to No Prophylaxis group. CONCLUSION: Our study does not support the routine usage of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with burn injuries, but their administration can be considered in certain specific subgroups like patients with inhalational burns and patients developing pneumonia. Pneumonia is an independent risk factor for mortality when no antibiotic prophylaxis is used in burn patients.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Queimaduras por Inalação/terapia , Queimaduras/terapia , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Sepse/prevenção & controle , Administração Intravenosa , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Pneumonia/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/epidemiologia , Sepse/mortalidade , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...