Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Pharm Biomed Anal ; 43(5): 1854-9, 2007 Apr 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17300896

RESUMO

Gastrointestinal stability of venlafaxine was evaluated in vitro in simulated gastric (SGF) and intestinal (SIF) fluids using a stability indicating HPLC method. The method was validated using a 5 microm Ascentis C18 column (150 mm x 4.6 mm) and mobile phase consisting of 30% acetonitrile in 20 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) delivered isocratically at a flow rate of 1 mL/min with UV detection at 228 nm. Venlafaxine in USP simulated gastric and intestinal fluids (0.4 mg/mL) was incubated at 37 degrees C in a shaking water bath. The gastric stability study samples were assayed at 0, 15, 30 and 60 min intervals while sampling for the intestinal stability study was at 0, 1, 2 and 3 h. System suitability determinations gave R.S.D.s of 0.68, 0.5 and 3.9% for retention factor (k'), peak area and tailing factor, respectively. The method was shown to be accurate, precise, specific, and linear over the analytical range. Intra- and inter-day precision was <5.3%. Forced degradation studies of drug substance in basic media at 70 degrees C as well as in H2O2 for 1 h and ultra-violet photostability studies at 255 and 365 nm for 24 h did not produce any detectable degradation products. Forced degradation studies of drug substance in acidic media at 70 degrees C for 1 h produced the dehydro-venlafaxine degradant. Venlafaxine was stable in SGF (pH approximately 1.2) for the 1-h incubation period and in SIF (pH 6.8) up to 3 h with <1.5% relative difference (RD) between the amount of drug added and that found for all time points. This stability experiment in simulated gastric and intestinal fluids suggests that drug loss in the gastrointestinal tract takes place by membrane permeation rather than a degradation process.


Assuntos
Antidepressivos de Segunda Geração/análise , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão/métodos , Cicloexanóis/análise , Trato Gastrointestinal/química , Mucosa Intestinal/química , Animais , Antidepressivos de Segunda Geração/química , Cicloexanóis/química , Estabilidade de Medicamentos , Temperatura Alta , Ácido Clorídrico/química , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Técnicas In Vitro , Estrutura Molecular , Pancreatina/química , Pepsina A/química , Fosfatos/química , Compostos de Potássio/química , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Hidróxido de Sódio/química , Suínos , Fatores de Tempo , Cloridrato de Venlafaxina , Água/química
3.
Mol Pharm ; 1(5): 357-62, 2004.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16026005

RESUMO

The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that rapidly dissolving immediate-release (IR) solid oral products containing a highly soluble and highly permeable drug [biopharmaceutical classification system (BCS) class I] are bioequivalent under fed conditions. Metoprolol and propranolol (BCS class I) as well as hydrochlorothiazide (BCS class III) were selected as model drugs. The relative bioavailability of two FDA approved (Orange Book AB rating) solid oral dosage forms of metoprolol and propranolol/hydrochlorothiazide (combination tablets) was evaluated in human volunteers under fed conditions using a two-way crossover design. Equal numbers of male and female volunteers were recruited, and racial and/or ethnic minorities were not excluded. The plasma concentrations of metoprolol, propranolol, and hydrochlorothiazide were determined using validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods. Eighteen subjects completed the metoprolol study while 17 subjects completed the propranolol/hydrochlorothiazide combination tablet study. In the metoprolol study, the 90% confidence intervals of Cmax and AUC(inf) were 98-118% and 92-115%, respectively. For propranolol, the 90% confidence intervals of Cmax and AUC(inf) were 91-121% and 89-117%, and for hydrochlorothiazide, the 90% confidence intervals for Cmax and AUC(inf) were 96-107% and 97-106%, respectively. These study results appear to support the hypothesis that rapidly dissolving IR solid oral products containing a BCS class I drug are likely to be bioequivalent under fed conditions. In addition, BCS class III drugs may have the potential to be bioequivalent under fed conditions.


Assuntos
Alimentos , Hidroclorotiazida/farmacocinética , Metoprolol/farmacocinética , Propranolol/farmacocinética , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Disponibilidade Biológica , Estudos Cross-Over , Feminino , Humanos , Hidroclorotiazida/administração & dosagem , Hidroclorotiazida/sangue , Masculino , Metoprolol/administração & dosagem , Metoprolol/sangue , Período Pós-Prandial , Propranolol/administração & dosagem , Propranolol/sangue , Valores de Referência , Solubilidade , Comprimidos , Fatores de Tempo
4.
J AOAC Int ; 86(6): 1112-23, 2003.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14979691

RESUMO

Twelve collaborating laboratories assayed 4 products, namely, Panax ginseng, Panax quinquefolius, and 2 ginseng products, for 6 ginsenosides: Rb1, Rb2, Rc, Rd, Re, and Rg1. Collaborators also received a negative control for the recovery study. Pure ginsenosides were provided as reference standards for the liquid chromatography (LC) analysis and the system suitability tests. The LC analyses were performed on the methanol extract using UV detection at 203 nm. For P. ginseng, individual ginsenosides were consistent in their means; repeatability standard deviations (RSDr) ranged from 4.17 to 5.09% and reproducibility standard deviations (RSDR) ranged from 7.27 to 11.3%. For P. quinquefolius, the Rb1 and Rb2 ginsenosides were higher and lower in concentration than P. ginseng, with RSDr values of 3.44 and 6.60% and RSDR values of 5.91 and 12.6% respectively, and other analytes at intermediate precisions. For ginseng commercial products, RSDr values ranged from 3.39 to 8.12%, and RSDR values ranged from 7.65 to 16.5%. A recovery study was also conducted for 3 ginsenosides: Rg1, Re, and Rb1. The average recoveries were 99.9, 96.2, and 92.3%, respectively. The method is not applicable for the determination of Rg1 and Re in ginseng product at levels <300 mg/kg.


Assuntos
Ginsenosídeos/análise , Panax/química , Sequência de Carboidratos , Cromatografia Líquida , Dados de Sequência Molecular , Raízes de Plantas/química , Pós , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Soluções , Espectrofotometria Ultravioleta
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...