Comparative Evaluation of Platelet-rich Fibrin and Treated Dentin Matrix in Regenerative Endodontic Treatment of Nonvital Immature Permanent Teeth: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

AIM: Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the efficacy of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and treated dentin matrix (TDM) in regenerative endodontic treatment and periapical healing of nonvital immature permanent teeth with chronic apical periodontitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four children aged between 7 and 11 years, each presenting with a nonvital immature permanent upper central incisor, were selected. They were randomly allocated into two groups (n = 12), group I (PRF) and group II (TDM). Baseline clinical findings were recorded, and preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was taken. Follow-up was done clinically for 15 months at 3-month intervals (3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 months), and CBCT was taken at the end of the 15-month follow-up. Root length, apical diameter, radiographic root area (RRA), and size of the periapical lesion were quantitively assessed at the end of follow-up period and compared to the preoperative CBCT. RESULTS: Clinical success was 100% in both groups by the end of the follow-up period. Radiographically, after a 15-month follow-up, there was a significant increase in root length and RRA, and there was also a significant reduction in apical diameter and lesion size within each group (p < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding the mean percentage of increase in root length and mean percentage of reduction of apical diameter (p > 0.05). On the other hand, PRF showed more increase in RRA and more reduction in lesion size, with a statistically significant difference between both groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both PRF and TDM were clinically successful. Platelet-rich fibrin showed better radiographic outcomes and periapical healing. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Platelet-rich fibrin is a viable scaffold to aid further root development and resolution of periapical lesions of nonvital immature permanent teeth. Further studies with different forms of TDM are needed to assess the efficacy of TDM in regenerative endodontic treatment of nonvital immature permanent teeth. How to cite this article: Asal MA, Elkalla IH, Awad SM, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Platelet-rich Fibrin and Treated Dentin Matrix in Regenerative Endodontic Treatment of Nonvital Immature Permanent Teeth: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(6):563-574.

Clinical and Microbiological Assessment of Carisolv and Polymer Bur for Selective Caries Removal in Primary Molars.

AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of the new Carisolv system and Polymer bur (SmartbursII®) for selective caries removal in primary molars clinically and microbiologically, compared with the conventional mechanical method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty children with class I active carious lesions were selected. The children were randomly allocated to three groups (n = 20) according to the caries removal method. Under rubber dam isolation, dentin samples were taken before and after caries removal for microbial culture. Time spent in each technique was recorded. The clinical efficacy of caries removal was verified using caries detector dye. Patient satisfaction toward the treatment was evaluated using a facial image scale. RESULTS: The median of caries detector dye scores was significantly lower in the conventional group compared to others (p value < 0.05). The mean time for caries removal was the longest with Carisolv (p value < 0.05). The median of facial image scale scores was significantly higher in the conventional group compared with others (p value < 0.05). The mean total viable bacterial count after caries removal was significantly higher in polymer bur group compared with others (p value < 0.05). While, there was no significant difference between Carisolv and conventional groups (p value > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The clinical efficacy of caries removal was highest with the mechanical method. Carisolv took the longest time for caries removal. Patient satisfaction was higher with Carisolv and polymer bur than the mechanical method. The antimicrobial efficacy of Carisolv and the mechanical method was higher than the polymer bur. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Carisolv is a viable alternative to the mechanical method in the management of dental caries, especially in children. Further studies are needed to assess the efficacy of caries removal by SmartbursII®. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Asal MA, Abdellatif AM, Hammouda HE. Clinical and Microbiological Assessment of Carisolv and Polymer Bur for Selective Caries Removal in Primary Molars. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2021;14(3):357-363.