Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Cardiol ; 82(1): 29-34, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36963659

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Valvular heart disease (VHD) is one of the commonest causes of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide, with acquired VHD especially prevalent in countries with aging populations. The scope and pattern of disease are not well understood, as some patients are asymptomatic and available options for invasive treatment vary by affected valve. We sought to understand the burden of VHD in Japan including the distribution of patients by valve disease type and age, using administrative claims data from acute care hospitals. METHODS: This was a retrospective descriptive study of patients with VHD diagnosis and at least one record of echocardiography in 2019 documented in the Medical Data Vision database. Affected valve(s) and type of valve disease were characterized using ICD-10 codes; patients undergoing invasive treatment for VHD at the same facility and during the same year as their diagnosis were assessed using procedure codes. RESULTS: Of 203,398 patients with VHD diagnosis and a record of echocardiography in 2019, 49.0 % had a mitral valve disorder, 44.9 % aortic valve, 22.9 % tricuspid valve, and 2.2 % pulmonic valve (14.9 % of patients had more than one disordered valve). A total of 7201 patients (<4 % of the total diagnosed population) received invasive treatment for VHD in 2019 at the diagnosing hospital. Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) had the highest mean age, at 79 years. Although mitral regurgitation was the most common VHD among diagnosed patients, AS predominated in the cohort of treated patients. A substantial portion of patients undergoing treatment for AS were age 85 years or older (27.2 %). CONCLUSIONS: The cohort of treated patients in 2019 was a small fraction of the total population with a VHD diagnosis in that year. Wide availability of transcatheter treatment for AS in Japan may be allowing more elderly patients to receive intervention than in other types of VHD.


Assuntos
Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral , Humanos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Japão/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/epidemiologia , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/terapia , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/diagnóstico , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/epidemiologia , Insuficiência da Valva Mitral/terapia , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/epidemiologia , Hospitais
2.
Value Health Reg Issues ; 21: 82-90, 2020 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31670112

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an innovative and effective treatment in high-surgical-risk (HR) and inoperable patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. OBJECTIVES: This cost-effectiveness analysis of transfemoral TAVI (TF-TAVI) compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) conforms with the methodological guidelines for cost-effectiveness evaluation by the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare in Japan. METHODS: The cost-effectiveness of TF-TAVI using SAPIEN XT was evaluated using a lifetime Markov simulation from the national payer perspective. Comparators were SAVR for HR patients and standard of care (SOC) for inoperable patients. A systematic literature review for clinical evidence of TF-TAVI and comparators was conducted. The evidence for TF-TAVI was derived from the SOURCE XT registry and Japanese post marketing surveillance. Because there was no literature directly or indirectly comparing TF-TAVI using SAPIEN XT with comparators, the comparator data were selected from relevant published studies, considering the similarity of study eligibility criteria and patient backgrounds (eg, age and surgical risk scores). Sensitivity analyses were used to validate the robustness of results. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of TF-TAVI versus SAVR for HR patients was ¥1.3 million/quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of TF-TAVI versus SOC for inoperable patients was ¥3.5 million/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: TF-TAVI was cost-effective when compared with SAVR for HR patients and when compared with SOC for inoperable patients, using a threshold of ¥5 million/QALY.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício/métodos , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/economia , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/economia , Assistência ao Convalescente/economia , Assistência ao Convalescente/tendências , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Análise Custo-Benefício/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas/tendências , Humanos , Japão , Masculino , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Avaliação da Tecnologia Biomédica/métodos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/métodos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...