Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Glaucoma ; 30(4): e169-e174, 2021 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33449583

RESUMO

PRECIS: Malposition of the tube through the ciliary sulcus is more frequently observed with the Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) than the Baerveldt drainage implant (BDI) due to the weaker rigidity of the Ahmed tube. PURPOSE: To report intraoperative and early postoperative complications of ciliary sulcus tube insertion of glaucoma drainage implants (GDIs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed retrospective analysis of 104 eyes of 94 patients with GDI tube insertion through the ciliary sulcus were performed. The rigidities of tubes were also examined using a microcompression tester. RESULTS: The mean observation period was 20.0 (range, 6 to 60) months. Thirteen eyes were treated with the BDI and 91 were with the AGV. The mean age of the patients was 69.3 (34 to 90) years. The mean intraocular pressure was 27.9 mm Hg before surgery and 12.9 mm Hg after surgery (P<0.01). Upon tube insertion 42/91 eyes (46%) with the AGV required reinsertion of the tube due to malpositioning, whereas only 1/13 (8%) eyes with BDI did (P<0.01). Transient hyphema (12 eyes) and hypotony (12 eyes) were observed as early postoperative complications with the AGV. Seven eyes with hypotony were treated by proline stenting of the tube. We could not accomplish sulcus insertions in 4 eyes. Microcompression analysis of the tubes showed that the BGI tube was more rigid than that of the AGV. CONCLUSIONS: Ciliary sulcus insertion of the tube is an effective method to control intraocular pressure. The tube of the AGV was more difficult to insert through the sulcus than the BDI due to its weaker rigidity.


Assuntos
Implantes para Drenagem de Glaucoma , Pressão Intraocular , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Seguimentos , Implantes para Drenagem de Glaucoma/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Implantação de Prótese , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Glaucoma ; 29(9): e106-e107, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32657820

RESUMO

To prevent corneal endothelial cell loss, ciliary sulcus tube insertion is preferred for the pseudophakic eye. However, we sometimes encounter technical difficulties when inserting the tube through the sulcus. Even in cases in which we are able to insert a 23-G needle through the sulcus into the space between the iris and intraocular lens, the tube of Ahmed valve may stray into the vitreous cavity or under Elschnig pearls. To remedy such conditions, we developed a new tube insertion method using a 4-0 proline stent as a guide to insert the tube in the appropriate position.


Assuntos
Implantes para Drenagem de Glaucoma , Glaucoma/cirurgia , Prolina , Implantação de Prótese/métodos , Suturas , Perda de Células Endoteliais da Córnea/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Pressão Intraocular , Stents , Técnicas de Sutura
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...