Valoración de resultados tras 112 radioembolizaciones con 90Y-microesferas / Evaluation of results after 112 radioembolizations with 90Y-microspheres

Objetivo Para conocer los resultados de la radioembolización (transarterial radioembolization o TARE), en el tratamiento de tumores hepáticos, se realizó una valoración retrospectiva tras 112 TARE con 90Y-microesferas administradas en 82 pacientes en un único hospital, analizando la eficacia y la seguridad, tras un seguimiento mayor o igual a 1 año post-TARE en todos los pacientes, y evaluando la posible relación entre la respuesta al tratamiento y la supervivencia de los pacientes. Material y métodos Se administraron 57 TARE únicas y 55 TARE múltiples en pacientes con hepatocarcinoma (53), metástasis hepáticas (25) y colangiocarcinoma (4), con evaluación previa multidisciplinar clínica, angiográfica y gammagráfica (planar/SPECT/SPECT-TC con 99mTc-MAA), modelo multicompartimental (ecuaciones MIRD), valoración gammagráfica post-TARE (planar/SPECT/SPECT-TC), seguimiento clínico-radiológico, evaluación de respuesta tumoral (criterios mRECIST) y análisis (Kaplan Meier) de supervivencia libre de progresión (SLP) y supervivencia global (SG). Resultados La intención terapéutica fue paliativa (82%) y como puente a trasplante hepático/resección quirúrgica (17%). Se obtuvo respuesta (R), completa o parcial, en el 65,9% de los casos. Al año post-TARE estaban libres de progresión el 34,7% de los pacientes con R y 19,2% de los no R (p:0,003), con SG del 80% para los R y 37,5% para los no R (p:0,001). Las curvas de supervivencia mostraron mediana de SG de 18 meses (95% IC 15,7-20,3) para los R y 9 meses (95% IC 6,1-11,8) para los no R (p:0,03). Efectos secundarios leves (27,6%) y severos (5,3%) resueltos, sin mayor incidencia tras TARE múltiple. Conclusiones La TARE con 90Y-microesferas en pacientes adecuadamente seleccionados con tumores hepáticos, aporta eficacia terapéutica y bajo índice de toxicidad, con SLP y SG superiores en los pacientes con respuesta a la TARE respecto a los que no respondieron (AU)

Aim To determine the results of radioembolization transarterial (TARE), in the treatment of liver tumors, a retrospective evaluation was performed after 112 TARE with 90Y-microspheres administered in 82 patients in a single hospital, analyzing efficacy and safety, after a follow-up greater than or equal to 1 year post-TARE in all patients, and evaluating the possible relationship between treatment response and patient survival Material and methods We have administered 57 single TARE and 55 multiple TARE in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (53), liver metastases (25) and cholangiocarcinoma (4), with prior multidisciplinary evaluation, clinical, angiographic and gammagraphic (planar/SPECT/SPECT-CT with 99mTc-MAA), multicompartment model (MIRD equations), post-TARE screening (planar/SPECT/SPECT-CT), clinical and radiological follow-up, tumor response evaluation (mRECIST criteria) and Kaplan–Meier analysis to determine progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results Therapeutic intention was palliative (82%) and as bridge to liver transplantation/surgical resection (17%). We obtained response (R), complete or partial, in 65.9% of cases. One year after TARE 34.7% of patients with R and 19.2% of non-R were progression-free (p: 0.003), with OS of 80% for R and 37.5% for non-R (p: 0.001). Survival analysis showed median OS of 18 months (95% CI 15.7–20.3) for R and 9 months (95% CI 6.1–11.8) for non-R (p: 0.03). We found mild (27.6%) and severe (5.3%) side effects, all of them resolved, without higher incidence after multiple TARE. Conclusion TARE with 90Y-microspheres, in appropriately selected patients with liver tumors, provides therapeutic efficacy and low rate of toxicity, with higher PFS and OS in patients with TARE response compared to those who did not respond (AU)

Evaluation of results after 112 radioembolizations with 90Y-microspheres.

AIM: To determine the results of radioembolization transarterial (TARE), in the treatment of liver tumors, a retrospective evaluation was performed after 112 TARE with 90Y-microspheres administered in 82 patients in a single hospital, analyzing efficacy and safety, after a follow-up greater than or equal to 1 year post-TARE in all patients, and evaluating the possible relationship between treatment response and patient survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have administered 57 single TARE and 55 multiple TARE in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (53), liver metastases (25) and cholangiocarcinoma (4), with prior multidisciplinary evaluation, clinical, angiographic and gammagraphic (planar/SPECT/SPECT-CT with 99mTc-MAA), multicompartment model (MIRD equations), post-TARE screening (planar/SPECT/SPECT-CT), clinical and radiological follow-up, tumor response evaluation (mRECIST criteria) and Kaplan-Meier analysis to determine progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Therapeutic intention was palliative (82%) and as bridge to liver transplantation/surgical resection (17%). We obtained response (R), complete or partial, in 65.9% of cases. One year after TARE 34.7% of patients with R and 19.2% of non-R were progression-free (P: .003), with OS of 80% for R and 37.5% for non-R (P: .001). Survival analysis showed median OS of 18 months (95% CI 15.7-20.3) for R and 9 months (95% CI 6.1-11.8) for non-R (P: .03). We found mild (27.6%) and severe (5.3%) side effects, all of them resolved, without higher incidence after multiple TARE. CONCLUSION: TARE with 90Y-microspheres, in appropriately selected patients with liver tumors, provides therapeutic efficacy and low rate of toxicity, with higher PFS and OS in patients with TARE response compared to those who did not respond.

Progreso y utilidad actual de la radiómica dentro del estudio PET/TC en cáncer de mama no metastásico: una revisión sistemática / Progress and current utility of radiomics in PET/CT study of non-metastatic breast cancer: A systematic review

Objetivo Sintetizar la evidencia actual sobre la utilidad de la radiómica en el análisis de la imagen PET/TC en cáncer de mama local o localmente avanzado y evaluar la calidad metodológica de los estudios radiómicos publicados al respecto. Material y métodos Revisión sistemática de artículos en distintas bases de datos hasta 2021 utilizando los términos «PET», «radiomics», «texture», «breast». Se seleccionaron solo artículos con datos humanos y que incluyeran una imagen de PET en su análisis. Se excluyeron estudios con datos de pruebas y menos de 20 pacientes. De cada artículo se extrajo el tamaño muestral, el radiotrazador utilizado, la técnica de imagen y las características de imagen extraídas. Se determinó la calidad metodológica de los estudios mediante el instrumento QUADAS-2. Resultados Se seleccionaron 18 artículos. El diseño retrospectivo fue el más utilizado. La característica radiómica más estudiada fue el SUVmax. Diversos parámetros radiómicos se correlacionaron con la caracterización tumoral, y la heterogeneidad tumoral demostró utilidad para predecir el curso de la enfermedad y la respuesta al tratamiento. La mayoría de los artículos mostraron un alto riesgo de sesgo, derivado principalmente de la selección de pacientes. Conclusiones Se observó una alta probabilidad de sesgo en los artículos publicados. La radiómica es un campo aún en desarrollo y son necesarios más estudios para demostrar su utilidad en la práctica clínica habitual. La herramienta QUADAS-2 permite la valoración crítica de la calidad metodológica de la evidencia disponible. Pese a las limitaciones, la radiómica se muestra como una herramienta que puede ayudar a conseguir un manejo oncológico personalizado en el cáncer de mama (AU)

Aim To synthesize the current evidence of the usefulness of radiomics in PET/CT image analysis in local and locally advanced breast cancer. Also, to evaluate the methodological quality of the radiomic studies published. Methods Systematic review of articles in different databases until 2021 using the terms «PET», «radiomics», «texture», «breast». Only articles with human data and that included a PET image were included. Studies with simulated data and with less than 20 patients were excluded. The sample size, radiotracer used, imaging technique, and radiomics characteristics were extracted from each article. The methodological quality of the studies was determined using the QUADAS-2 tool. Results Eighteen articles were selected. The retrospective design was the most used. The most studied radiomic characteristic was SUVmax. Several radiomic parameters were correlated with tumor characterization, and tumor heterogeneity proved useful for predicting disease course and response to treatment. Most articles showed a high risk of bias, mainly from the patient selection. Conclusions A high probability of bias was observed in most of the published articles. Radiomics is a developing field and more studies are needed to demonstrate its usefulness in routine clinical practice. The QUADAS-2 tool allows critical assessment of the methodological quality of the available evidence. Despite its limitations, radiomics is shown to be an instrument that can help to achieve personalized oncologic management of breast cancer (AU)

Progress and current utility of radiomics in PET/CT study of non-metastatic breast cancer: A systematic review.

AIM: To synthesize the current evidence of the usefulness of radiomics in PET/CT image analysis in local and locally advanced breast cancer. Also, to evaluate the methodological quality of the radiomic studies published. METHODS: Systematic review of articles in different databases until 2021 using the terms "PET", "radiomics", "texture", "breast". Only articles with human data and that included a PET image were included. Studies with simulated data and with less than 20 patients were excluded. Were extracted sample size, radiotracer used, imaging technique, and radiomics characteristics from each article. The methodological quality of the studies was determined using the QUADAS-2 tool. RESULTS: 18 articles were selected. The retrospective design was the most used. The most studied radiomic characteristic was SUVmax. Several radiomic parameters were correlated with tumor characterization, and tumor heterogeneity proved useful for predicting disease course and response to treatment. Most articles showed a high risk of bias, mainly from the patient selection. CONCLUSIONS: A high probability of bias was observed in most of the published articles. Radiomics is a developing field and more studies are needed to demonstrate its usefulness in routine clinical practice. The QUADAS-2 tool allows critical assessment of the methodological quality of the available evidence. Despite its limitations, radiomics is shown to be an instrument that can help to achieve personalized oncologic management of breast cancer.