Clozapine Titration for People in Early Psychosis: A Chart Review and Treatment Guideline.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: The use of clozapine, particularly in young people, is often limited by early treatment-emergent adverse effects including drowsiness and lethargy. Concerns about adverse effects, medication adherence, and the need for blood monitoring often impede the use of clozapine in this population, leading to repeated trials of less effective medications. Current clozapine dosing recommendations are based on people further in the course of their illness and thus reflect different responsiveness and sensitivities to antipsychotic medication. As such, there is a need for evidence-based guidelines for titration and dosing of clozapine among people in early psychosis. METHODS/PROCEDURES: We performed a chart review of 14 people treated with clozapine within our early psychosis team. Data regarding dose titration, response, time to discontinuation, symptom severity, weight gain, and other adverse effects were gathered at clozapine initiation, 3 months, and last available visit on clozapine. FINDINGS/RESULTS: People treated with slow titration within their first year of psychosis onset achieved sustained response at very low maintenance doses (mean dose = 81 mg/d, mean duration of treatment = 200 weeks) compared with slow titration with longer duration of illness (mean dose = 350 mg/d, mean duration of treatment = 68 weeks) or standard dose titration in early psychosis (mean dose = 112 mg/d, mean duration of treatment = 38 weeks). The most common adverse effects in all groups were weight gain and sedation, with the groups requiring higher mean doses reporting a broader range of adverse effects. There was no apparent difference in the clinical global impression for severity or improvement between the slow titration and standard titration groups in people with early psychosis. These observations are synthesized into a proposed treatment guideline for use of clozapine among people in early psychosis. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: We describe development of a slow titration approach to initiating clozapine among people in early psychosis. This approach resulted in clinical response at remarkably low maintenance doses of clozapine among people within their first year of illness, but not in those with longer duration of symptoms. Slow titration also led to good tolerability and acceptance of clozapine treatment for some patients.

Health information in Vietnamese-American print media: results of a content analysis.

PURPOSE: Vietnamese-Americans (VA) constitute a large minority community that is mostly foreign born with limited English proficiency. This article compares the health content of free print media targeting VA with that of free English-language print media. DESIGN: Content analysis. SETTING: All free print media available at the three largest VA-serving supermarkets in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, were reviewed. Comparison English-language periodicals included free and purchased publications. MEASURES: We identified and coded 254 health content-containing articles from 22 issues of six periodicals (four free Vietnamese, one free English language, and one purchased English language) collected over a 4-week period. ANALYSIS: Chi-square and t-tests for independent samples were used to compare free Vietnamese- and free English-language periodicals. Additional analyses included all English-language periodicals as the comparison group. RESULTS: Higher proportions of advertisements and "pseudonews" articles (ads formatted like news stories) were found in free Vietnamese- vs. free English-language publications (overt ads, 61% vs. 28%; pseudonews, 18% vs. 0%). Moreover, Vietnamese-language publications did not contain many articles addressing diseases most commonly found in Asian-Americans. DISCUSSION: The significant proportion made up by profit-motivated health content in VA print media points to an untapped opportunity to provide evidence-based information about health topics of interest to this community. Future studies should examine secular trends, assess multiple communities, and develop community-based participatory approaches to improving access to quality health information among minorities with limited English proficiency.

Efficacy of cholesterol uptake inhibition added to statin therapy among subjects following a low-carbohydrate diet: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Low-carbohydrate diets are frequently used as part of weight-loss programs. These are typically associated with increased fat intake. Therefore, cholesterol absorption inhibition is a logical therapeutic strategy to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in subjects following a low-carbohydrate diet. However, the efficacy of cholesterol absorption inhibition added to statin therapy has not been studied in this common clinical setting. METHODS: We performed a randomized controlled trial to compare the effects of ezetimibe on LDL-C when added to simvastatin among subjects following a low-carbohydrate diet. We enrolled 65 subjects who were overweight or obese (body mass index 25-45 kg/m(2)) and had a moderately elevated LDL-C (130-190 mg/dL). During a 4-week diet run-in, subjects were instructed to restrict carbohydrate intake to <30 g/day. Subjects demonstrating adequate adherence to a low-carbohydrate diet (n = 58) were randomized to simvastatin (20 mg) or simvastatin (20 mg) plus ezetimibe (10 mg) for 8 weeks. RESULTS: Body weight decreased by 3.1% (95% CI 2.1%-4.0%, P < .0001), but the magnitude of weight change did not differ between the groups (P = .92). The LDL-C decreased by 32 mg/dL (95% CI 21-42 mg/dL) in the simvastatin arm and 60 mg/dL (95% CI 45-75 mg/dL) in the combined simvastatin-ezetimibe arm (P = .002). This corresponded to a 20.9% reduction (95% CI 14.5%-27.4%) in LDL-C on simvastatin alone, compared with a 37.4% reduction (95% CI 29.3%-45.6%) on simvastatin-ezetimibe (P = .002). A significant 15.8% reduction in triglycerides was observed among enrolled subjects, which did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among subjects following a low-carbohydrate diet, combined statin and cholesterol absorption inhibitor therapy is more effective than statin monotherapy for LDL-C lowering.

Examining faculty awards for gender equity and evolving values.

BACKGROUND: Awards given to medical school faculty are one important mechanism for recognizing what is valued in academic medicine. There have been concerns expressed about the gender distribution of awards, and there is also a growing appreciation for the evolving accomplishments and talents that define academic excellence in the 21st century and that should be considered worthy of award recognition. OBJECTIVE: Examine faculty awards at our institution for gender equity and evolving values. METHODS: Recipient data were collected on awards from 1996 to 2007 inclusively at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine (SOM). Descriptions of each award also were collected. The female-to-male ratio of award recipients over the time span was reviewed for changes and trends. The title and text of each award announcement were reviewed to determine if the award represented a traditional or a newer concept of excellence in academic medicine. MAIN RESULTS: There were 21 annual awards given to a total of 59 clinical award recipients, 60 research award recipients, and 154 teaching award recipients. Women received 28% of research awards, 29% of teaching awards and 10% of clinical awards. Gender distribution of total awards was similar to that of SOM full-time faculty except in the clinical awards category. Only one award reflected a shift in the culture of individual achievement to one of collaboration and team performance. CONCLUSION: Examining both the recipients and content of awards is important to assure they reflect the current composition of diverse faculty and the evolving ideals of leadership and excellence in academic medicine.