Effect of application rate and irrigation on the movement and dissipation of indaziflam.

Indaziflam is a new preemergence herbicide for the control of annual grass and broadleaf weeds in various cropping systems including pecan orchards. The objectives of this study were to (1) determine the mobility and dissipation of indaziflam and (2) evaluate herbicide efficacy in a flood-irrigated pecan orchard in southern New Mexico, USA. Indaziflam was applied at 0, 36.5, and 73.1g/ha in areas with (impacted) and without (unimpacted) tree injury symptoms. Soil samples were collected at 0-15, 15-30, and 30-46cm depths 26, 63, 90, and 126days after the first herbicide application. Additional soil samples were collected 4, 30, and 56days after the second application. Indaziflam was detected in soil samples collected at each depth, suggesting movement with irrigation water. Indaziflam concentrations decreased with increasing soil depth and time. Indaziflam mass recoveries were greater in the unimpacted area than in the impacted area after the first and second applications. Dissipation half-lives of indaziflam in the soil ranged from 30 to 86days for total indaziflam recovered from the entire soil profile after the first and second applications in both areas. The percent weed control was similar in the impacted and unimpacted areas for both rates of indaziflam on 26 and 63days after application; however, on 90days after the application, percent weed control was lower in the impacted than unimpacted area.

Mobility of indaziflam influenced by soil properties in a semi-arid area.

Indaziflam, a broad-spectrum, pre-emergence herbicide was the focus of a field investigation conducted after the identification of sporadic injury symptoms on the pecan trees a few months after the application. The study was conducted in two pecan orchards located in southern New Mexico, USA, and southeastern Arizona, USA. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the occurrence and distribution of indaziflam in the soil profile of areas where pecan trees were injured (impacted) and areas where no injury symptoms were observed (unimpacted), and to determine the relationship between indaziflam concentrations and soil properties in those locations. Soil samples were collected, one year after applications, from six depth representing 0-7, 7-15, 15-30, 30-60, 60-90 and 90-120 cm depth to determine the concentration of indaziflam in impacted and unimpacted areas of the two orchards. Soil samples were analyzed to determine texture, bulk density, organic matter content, cation exchange capacity, pH, nitrate, chloride and calcium concentrations. The detection frequency of indaziflam was higher in Arizona than in New Mexico, likely due to the differences between the tillage practices and sand contents of the orchards. No significant correlations were observed between indaziflam and soil properties, however indaziflam was mostly detected in areas where pecan trees were unimpacted probably as result of greater organic matter content and soil porosity. More research is needed to understand the causes of injury to pecan trees by indaziflam application.

Bases for interactions between saflufenacil and glyphosate in plants.

Buckwheat (Fagropyrum esculentum Moench.), cabbage (Brassica oleracea L), and conventional and glyphosate-resistant varieties of canola (Brassica napus L.) were used to study the bases of saflufenacil and glyphosate interactions. Compared to the addition of Merge (surfactant), the addition of both Transorb (i.e., commercial product, Transorb formulation with glyphosate) and Merge increased the cuticular absorption of [(14)C] saflufenacil in cabbage plants with thick epicuticular wax layers. However, in all cases, the addition of glyphosate reduced the translocation of [(14)C]saflufenacil in glyphosate-susceptible plants, while translocation was not affected in glyphosate-resistant canola. Moreover, the phytotoxicity of saflufenacil reduced the activity of glyphosate, possibly by reducing its translocation in all plant species studied. Increased absorption of saflufenacil by the addition of Transorb (i.e., Transorb formulation with glyphosate) plus Merge appears to increase its contact activity, thus the interaction of saflufenacil and glyphosate involves two separate processes, absorption and translocation.