How to manage Graves' disease in women of childbearing potential.

The management of Graves' disease (GD) in women of childbearing potential has multiple specific complexities. Many factors are involved, which differ at the various stages from preconception, conception, first trimester, later pregnancy, postpartum and lactation, with both maternal and foetal considerations. The incidence and significance of the risks incurred from antithyroid drugs (ATDs) in pregnancy have been re-evaluated recently and must be balanced against the risks of uncontrolled hyperthyroidism during childbearing years. Contraception is advised until hyperthyroidism is controlled. ATD cessation should be considered in those who are well controlled on low dose therapy before conception and in early pregnancy. Advice on iodine supplementation does not generally differ in those with GD. Radioiodine (RAI) is contraindicated from 6 months preconception until completion of breastfeeding. In all women who have a history of GD, monitoring of TSH receptor antibodies (TRAb) is strongly recommended during pregnancy, and if elevated, foetal monitoring and assessment of thyroid function in the neonate are required. Of note, RAI increases TRAb for up to a year, making this treatment option even less attractive in this patient group. A small amount of ATD is transferred into breast milk but low doses are safe during lactation. Routine periodic thyroid function testing is recommended in remission to detect postpartum GD recurrence. We present our approach to the Clinical Question 'How to manage GD in women of childbearing potential?'

A low serum alkaline phosphatase may signal hypophosphatasia in osteoporosis clinic patients.

Low serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) was found in 9% of patients attending an osteoporosis clinic, 0.6% of hospital patients, and 2/22 with an atypical femoral fracture. Hypophosphatasia was diagnosed in 3% of osteoporosis clinic patients with low ALP. Low ALP is a screening tool for hypophosphatasia, a condition potentially aggravated by antiresorptive therapy. INTRODUCTION: Hypophosphatasia (HPP) is an inherited disorder associated with impaired primary mineralisation of osteoid (osteomalacia). HPP may be misdiagnosed as osteoporosis, a reduction in the volume of normally mineralized bone. Both illnesses may result in fragility fractures, although stress and atypical fractures are more common in HPP. Antiresorptive therapy, first-line treatment for osteoporosis, is relatively contraindicated in HPP. Misdiagnosis and mistreatment can be avoided by recognising a low serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP). Our aim was to determine the prevalence of a low ALP (< 30 IU/L) in patients attending an osteoporosis clinic, in a hospital-wide setting, and in a group of patients with atypical femoral fractures (AFF). METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients attending an osteoporosis clinic at a tertiary hospital during 8 years (2012-2020). Patients were categorised into those with a transiently low ALP, those with low ALP on ≥ 2 occasions but not the majority of measurements, and those with a persistently low ALP. ALP levels were also assessed in hospital-wide records and a group of patients with AFF. RESULTS: Of 1839 patients attending an osteoporosis clinic, 168 (9%) had ≥ 1 low ALP, 50 (2.7%) had low ALP for ≥ 2 months, and seven (0.4%) had persistently low ALP levels. HPP was diagnosed in five patients, four of whom had persistently low ALP levels. The prevalence of HPP was 0.3% in the osteoporosis clinic and 3% in patients with ≥ 1 low ALP. Low ALP occurred in 0.6% of all hospital patients and 2/22 with AFF. CONCLUSION: Persistently low ALP in osteoporosis clinic attendees is easy to identify and signals the possibility of hypophosphatasia, a condition that may be mistaken for osteoporosis and incorrectly treated with antiresorptive therapy.

Perianal sepsis in neutropaenic patients with haematological malignancies: the role of magnetic resonance imaging and surgery.

BACKGROUND: Perianal sepsis occurs in up to 10% of neutropaenic patients with haematological malignancy and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The management of this condition is challenging in neutropaenic patients due to its atypical pathophysiology. The aim of this study is to assess the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgery in neutropaenic patients with perianal sepsis. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on all neutropenic patients with a haematological malignancy who had a diagnosis of perianal sepsis during the inpatient admission between 2008 and 2017. Patient characteristics, symptoms, haematological data, MRI result, surgical intervention, intraoperative findings and outcomes including recurrence and mortality were collected. RESULTS: Nineteen neutropaenic patients with haematological malignancy were treated for perianal sepsis, eight (42%) patients were managed conservatively and 11 (58%) were managed surgically. Nine patients underwent MRI, which identified a collection in 88% of cases despite severe neutropaenia. In patients with a collection identified on MRI prior to surgery, 80% had a drainable collection confirmed intraoperatively. Post-operative complications included two cases of sepsis from a presumed perianal source and one death. A total of 82% of patients experienced symptom resolution after surgery compared to 88% of patients managed conservatively. CONCLUSION: This study has demonstrated that MRI is a useful diagnostic tool in evaluating perianal sepsis in patients with haematological malignancy, even during periods of severe neutropenia. We found that both conservative and surgical management strategies lead to resolution of symptoms.